The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #52 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | #52 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #71 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | #58 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | #66 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #50 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #36 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | #18 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and SabeeApp PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs. Both aim to streamline your property management but do so with different focuses and levels of maturity. Counter, with 54 recent reviews and a 4.73/5 rating, offers a more proven, user-rated solution, whereas SabeeApp, despite its extensive features, currently lacks review data for comparison. Are you prioritizing a widely trusted platform, or are you exploring a newer, comprehensive solution?
Counter is a free, hostels-focused PMS favored by many for its ease of use and support, but SabeeApp’s broader feature set and multi-property capabilities might appeal to hotels with more complex needs. Which approach aligns better with your property size and tech readiness?
Counter primarily serves hostels and small properties, offering a simple yet functional interface that’s been highly rated by users. Its strengths lie in quick onboarding, mobile accessibility, and automation features like POS and night audits. SabeeApp, on the other hand, is geared toward independent hotels and boutique properties, providing a more holistic platform that consolidates reservations, housekeeping, billing, and revenue analytics into one system.
While Counter boasts a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 54 recent reviews, SabeeApp’s lack of review data makes it difficult to assess user satisfaction, though its feature breadth suggests a more complex platform. Do you need a straightforward system with proven support, or a multifunctional tool capable of managing multiple operational facets?
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or small inn with a focus on ease of use and quick deployment, Counter is the better choice. Its high ease-of-use rating (4.6/5), customer support (4.96/5), and a dedicated focus on hostel needs make it ideal for hoteliers seeking a simple, reliable PMS. Conversely, SabeeApp suits properties that need to integrate reservations, housekeeping, billing, and channel management in one platform, especially if they handle multiple sources and require real-time revenue insights.
For small hostels or properties with limited operational complexity, Counter simplifies daily management. Larger, independent hotels wanting an all-in-one cloud system that centralizes multiple workflows should consider SabeeApp, despite the current lack of recent review data.
Counter scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive, clean interface that requires minimal staff training. Users praise its mobile-friendly design and straightforward calendar views, enabling remote management and quick onboarding. SabeeApp, while comprehensive, does not currently have a published ease-of-use rating or recent reviews, making it harder to assess its user-friendliness.
Given the available data, Counter’s UI and onboarding process are clearly more trusted and tested. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 exclusive features, including a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, and multi-currency support. These features directly address hostel-specific needs, providing automation and operational control. SabeeApp’s platform includes reservation management, a drag-and-drop calendar, OTA synchronization, automated housekeeping, and mobile check-in, but lacks the detailed feature count for direct comparison.
Counter’s features are tailored for hostel management, while SabeeApp provides a broader hotel management suite. For properties requiring specialized hostel tools, Counter’s feature set is more targeted. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and helpful staff, notably Evelyn and Max. Users feel confident that their support queries are addressed promptly, although some mention slower assistance in certain time zones. SabeeApp’s support ratings and recent reviews are unavailable, making it difficult to compare support quality directly.
Based on available data, Counter’s support reputation is superior. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, WuBook, SiteMinder, and Goki, mainly focusing on payment and channel management. SabeeApp connects with 17 verified partners, including Tripadvisor, PriceLabs, and VingCard, offering a wider range of integrations covering revenue management, guest access, and distribution.
If extensive integrations matter for your tech stack, SabeeApp’s broader partner network is advantageous. For core channel and payment integrations, Counter meets most hostel needs efficiently. Edge: SabeeApp.
Counter’s user reviews, though limited to hostels, are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.75/5 rating from 52 reviews and a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hotelier feedback highlights its simplicity, support, and automation. SabeeApp currently lacks recent reviews, so a direct rating comparison is impossible.
For properties similar to hostels or small inns, Counter’s high satisfaction scores indicate strong user approval. SabeeApp’s rating data is insufficient to determine its hoteliers’ preferences. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly list specific pricing but is offered as a free, no-implementation-fee PMS, making it particularly attractive for budget-conscious hostels. SabeeApp’s pricing details are also unavailable, which is typical for enterprise systems, but it likely involves subscription fees based on property size and features.
Counter’s free model offers significant ROI for small properties, while SabeeApp’s paid structure may suit larger or more complex hotels needing extensive features.
Not ideal if your property:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Counter by Counter delivers a straightforward, hostels-focused PMS with high user satisfaction and rapid support, making it ideal for small-scale properties. Its 54 recent reviews with a 4.73/5 rating show a proven track record of usability and support, especially for hostel managers.
SabeeApp, despite its broader capabilities and more integrations, currently lacks recent review data, which makes it harder to evaluate its performance in real-world hotel settings. Its extensive feature set and multi-property support are better suited for independent hotels needing a unified management system.
If your hotel is a hostel or small property seeking a reliable, easy-to-use PMS, Counter is the clear choice. For larger independent hotels with more complex operations and a need for extensive integrations, SabeeApp could be more suitable once user feedback confirms its ease of use and support quality.
In conclusion, go with Counter for proven simplicity, support, and hostel specialization. Choose SabeeApp if your property requires a more comprehensive, multi-source management platform and you’re prepared to evaluate its performance once reviews accumulate.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 SabeeApp Property Management System 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SabeeApp Property Management System 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。SabeeApp Property Management System:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,SabeeApp 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问