The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Scidoo |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | #65 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Scidoo |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #76 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | #68 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Scidoo |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #63 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #59 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Scidoo by Scidoo hinges on your property’s specific needs and operational scope. Counter is a full-featured property management system (PMS) with a focus on hostels, offering extensive integrations, automation, and a proven track record backed by more reviews and recent feedback. Scidoo, while less reviewed and with no recent user feedback, emphasizes AI-driven insights for rental property operations. Which product aligns best with your current priorities: robust management features or data-driven guest insights?
Counter’s comprehensive suite of features and large hotel segment coverage make it a dependable choice for hostels and small lodging businesses seeking efficiency. Scidoo’s AI capabilities might appeal to management teams looking for insights and recommendations, but its lack of recent reviews suggests less proven adoption. Are you ready to prioritize established functionality or explore future-oriented automation?
Counter and Scidoo aim to streamline property management but serve different hotel profiles. Counter is designed specifically for hostels, with 54 reviews in the last six months—indicating active use—and a high overall rating of 4.73/5. Its features include channel management, automated payment processing, a booking engine, and housekeeping modules, built for high-volume, fast-paced hostel environments.
Scidoo, however, has no recent reviews or user feedback, making it difficult to gauge its effectiveness. It emphasizes AI-driven insights for rental properties but lacks the broad feature set or proven track record observed in Counter. Do you want a trusted, user-reviewed PMS with proven results, or are you exploring AI tools with less operational history?
Counter offers a full suite of features tailored to your hostel’s daily needs, with 7 verified integrations, including Channel Manager and Stripe, facilitating smooth operations. In contrast, Scidoo’s minimal features and absence of recent reviews suggest it’s in early or limited deployment stages. Will you rely on a platform with demonstrable operational impact, or consider an untested AI-focused alternative?
If your hotel primarily operates hostels or small lodging businesses requiring a reliable, easy-to-use PMS, go with Counter. Its high review count and recent feedback confirm its capabilities, especially for hostels with a high turnover rate and need for automation. Counter is ideal for properties seeking channel management, online support, and integrated POS systems to streamline check-ins, payments, and housekeeping.
If your focus is on rental or apartment-style properties and you want to harness AI insights to improve guest satisfaction and operational efficiency, Scidoo might be tempting. However, its lack of recent reviews and proven features suggest it’s less suitable for day-to-day management—making Counter the safer, more proven choice for most hotels.
For hoteliers who prioritize operational stability, proven integrations, and user satisfaction, Counter is the clear winner. If early AI-driven analytics appeal more and your property is in a growth phase, Scidoo could be worth exploring, but its untested status is a risk.
Counter scores well across usability metrics with a 4.6/5 rating and positive reviews praising its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface. Users highlight its straightforward setup, easy training for staff, and simple calendar views, making daily operations smoother. Support responsiveness is also highly praised, with specific mentions of staff like Evelyn and Max.
Scidoo provides no recent reviews or user feedback, so its ease of use remains unverified. Its AI-driven focus suggests a potentially complex interface that might require onboarding and training, yet no user experience data is available to confirm this.
Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 unique features, including a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features directly address core hostel management needs, enabling automation and operational control. Users value its integrated POS system and centralized role management, which streamline multifaceted operations.
Scidoo offers no distinct features or integrations listed, emphasizing AI analytics for guest feedback and operational insights. While promising, its limited feature set and lack of detailed capabilities mean it cannot match Counter’s breadth.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support scores an impressive 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses from team members like Evelyn and Max. Many hoteliers appreciate the ongoing support and flexibility, especially as Counter is a newer platform still actively improving.
Scidoo provides no recent support or onboarding data, so its support quality is unknown. Without recent user feedback, it's impossible to gauge responsiveness or reliability.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Channel Manager platforms like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Stripe, ensuring your property can connect with major OTAs and payment systems. Its integrations facilitate automation, online booking, and revenue management, supporting diverse operational needs.
Scidoo has 5 verified integrations, including Revolution Plus and MyForecast, but lacks the breadth and depth of Counter’s ecosystem. The broader selection of integrations makes Counter more adaptable to your existing tech stack.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s 54 recent reviews with a 4.73/5 overall rating indicate strong satisfaction, especially among hostel operators, who praise its simplicity and support. The most recent reviews highlight ease of onboarding and effective automation, reinforcing its practical value.
Scidoo has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its user satisfaction unverified. Without recent feedback, it’s challenging to assess how well it meets hotelier needs.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly disclose its pricing but offers a subscription model that includes a freemium option or custom quotes based on your property size and needs. Its transparent feature list suggests a predictable investment.
Scidoo also lacks detailed pricing information, making comparison difficult. Its value proposition remains unclear without known costs.
In absence of specific figures, your best bet is to request quotes directly from both vendors.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter stands out as the more robust, well-reviewed PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, offering a broad feature set, proven integrations, and high user satisfaction. Its active development and positive recent reviews make it the safer, more reliable choice, especially for properties seeking operational stability.
Scidoo, while promising with AI-driven insights, remains unproven with no recent reviews or clear feature details. It’s better suited for property managers exploring AI tools or managing rental portfolios rather than seeking a comprehensive PMS.
If your priority is a tested, feature-rich PMS with a strong support network, counter your options. If you’re experimenting with AI-driven guest insights and have more flexible operational needs, Scidoo may warrant a closer look—but proceed cautiously.
In conclusion, for most hotels and hostels looking for a dependable management solution, Counter is the superior choice given its extensive reviews, recent positive feedback, and proven feature set.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Scidoo 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Scidoo 提供 6 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Scidoo:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Scidoo 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问