The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Online 24/7 support and Automated night audit.
GP Dati Hotel Service 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and On premise.
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 GP Dati Hotel Service 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Your hotel is evaluating two property management systems: Counter by Counter and GP Dati Scrigno by Zucchetti. Counter, launched in 2019 and designed primarily for hostels, offers an intuitive, mobile-friendly interface with a focus on ease of use and automation. GP Dati Scrigno, established in 1978, is a comprehensive hotel management platform emphasizing integration across departments and customer relationship marketing. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Counter is built for small to mid-sized hostels, prioritizing simplicity, automation, and rapid onboarding. GP Dati Scrigno caters to larger hotel operations seeking extensive departmental integration and strategic management tools. Which features matter most for your property?
Counter excels at providing a quick, easy-to-navigate platform for hostels, with high ratings in ease of use (4.6/5) and customer support (4.96/5). Its review count of 54 over recent months indicates active engagement, and the platform’s recent reviews show consistent satisfaction among hostel operators. Conversely, GP Dati Scrigno has no recent reviews, a zero score across ratings, and no user feedback, making it impossible to assess its current performance.
Counter’s strengths include a mobile-friendly interface and automated features such as payment processing and POS integration, ideal for fast-paced hostel environments. GP Dati Scrigno offers a broad, all-in-one suite designed for large hotel chains, with complex features like customer data sharing and departmental integration, but lacks recent user insights to evaluate its usability or support quality.
Are you looking for a proven, well-rated solution with recent reviews? Or do you require a highly integrated system that might lack current user feedback?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, affordable PMS that simplifies daily operations and is easy for staff to adopt, go with Counter. Its focus on hostels and small hotels means you'll benefit from an intuitive interface, automation, and excellent support, especially if your team values quick onboarding and mobile management.
If your hotel requires an enterprise-level system that integrates marketing, sales, finance, and operational data into one platform, GP Dati Scrigno might be more suitable. Its core strength lies in centralized data sharing and customer relationship management, making it ideal for larger hotels or chains with complex departmental needs.
For most small to mid-sized hostels, Counter's track record and recent reviews make it the clear choice. Larger hotels seeking deep integration and strategic management should consider GP Dati Scrigno, despite the lack of recent user feedback.
Counter’s user interface scores a high 4.6/5, praised for its simplicity and mobile compatibility. Reviewers highlight its clean, intuitive design that’s easy to learn and operate, with onboarding rated 4.7/5. Support responsiveness is also a standout, with many users citing quick, helpful assistance from dedicated staff.
In contrast, GP Dati Scrigno has no available recent reviews or ratings, leaving its ease of use and onboarding experience unverified. Its extensive features suggest a steeper learning curve, more suited for users comfortable with complex systems.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 16 shared features plus three unique functionalities: online support 24/7, automated night audit, and multi-currency management. Its automation capabilities and channel manager integrations with platforms like SiteMinder and Stripe are highly regarded.
GP Dati Scrigno’s seven unique features include a Spa & Wellness module, revenue management, integrated CRS, digital registration, native email marketing, and ID/passport scanning. It boasts a broad set of strategic tools but lacks the extensive third-party integrations available in Counter.
While Counter’s features cater to daily operations and automation, GP Dati Scrigno’s strengths lie in departmental coordination and marketing. For core PMS functionalities, Counter has a slight edge in versatility and integration options.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support is praised for its responsiveness and professionalism, with an average rating of 4.96/5. Reviewers frequently mention quick help from staff like Evelyn and Max, though some note slower responses in certain time zones.
GP Dati Scrigno has no recent reviews or ratings to evaluate support quality. Its lack of recent engagement makes it impossible to determine current support standards or responsiveness.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder and Cloudbeds, and payment platforms like Stripe. Its integration ecosystem supports multi-platform booking management and automated payments.
GP Dati Scrigno integrates with only one verified partner—Duetto—focusing on revenue management. Its limited integrations restrict connectivity with third-party tools compared to Counter.
For those valuing a broad ecosystem, Counter provides more options. GP Dati Scrigno’s narrower integration scope suits hotels seeking a centralized, all-in-one management suite.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s overall rating of 4.73/5, based on 54 recent reviews, indicates strong user satisfaction. Hoteliers particularly appreciate its ease of use, automation, and support, especially in hostel segments where it scores 4.75/5.
GP Dati Scrigno lacks recent reviews and ratings, preventing a meaningful comparison. The absence of recent user feedback suggests its performance and satisfaction levels are unverified in the current market.
Given the active review base, Counter is the higher-rated product by a considerable margin.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly disclose pricing but operates on a subscription model with no freemium, flat monthly, or per-room fees. Its transparent pricing structure isn’t available, but users highlight it as affordable for small hostels.
GP Dati Scrigno also provides no explicit pricing details, with both platforms offering no-trial options. Cost may vary based on custom configurations or enterprise agreements, but transparency is limited.
In absence of concrete figures, your best bet is to contact vendors directly for tailored quotes.
Not ideal if...
Not ideal if...
Counter is an accessible, well-rated PMS designed for hostels and small hotels, offering ease of use, automation, and extensive integrations. With over 54 recent reviews and a 4.73/5 rating, it provides a proven solution with responsive support, making it ideal for properties prioritizing simplicity and operational automation.
GP Dati Scrigno is a robust, enterprise-focused management suite aimed at larger hotels seeking departmental integration and strategic tools. However, the lack of recent user feedback limits confidence in its current performance or support.
For most small to mid-sized properties, especially hostels, Counter’s active, positive reputation makes it the better choice. Larger hotels requiring deep departmental connectivity should consider GP Dati Scrigno, provided they can verify its current support and usability.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 GP Dati Scrigno (by Zucchetti) 共享 16 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 自动夜间审计 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 GP Dati Scrigno (by Zucchetti) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GP Dati Scrigno (by Zucchetti) 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。GP Dati Scrigno (by Zucchetti):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,GP Dati Hotel Service 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问