The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Sedna |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Sedna |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Sedna |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
When evaluating property management systems for your hotel, you're often choosing between a solution with extensive user feedback and one that is newer with limited reviews. Counter by Counter stands out with a strong track record, boasting over 54 reviews in the last six months, an impressive 4.73/5 overall rating, and a 91% likelihood to recommend. Sedna PMS by Sedna, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess its real-world performance or customer satisfaction.
Both products claim to solve core hotel management problems like reservations, guest data, and operations, but Counter's established presence and extensive feature set suggest a more reliable choice. Which platform truly delivers on ease of use, support, and features based on actual user experiences?
Counter is designed primarily for hostels, B&Bs, and small hotels, focusing on simplicity, automation, and integration. Its user interface scores 4.6/5, and support is rated 4.96/5, with users praising its intuitive design and quick customer service, especially in recent reviews. Sedna PMS offers no user ratings or reviews to compare, making it impossible to evaluate its usability or support quality.
Counter provides a full suite of features explicitly tailored for small-scale and hostel operations, including channel management, online booking, automated night audit, and guest CRM. Sedna's feature set remains unspecified, and its lack of reviews suggests a need for more transparency regarding its capabilities. Which system has proven value with real hotel teams?
Counter is highly rated for ease of use, with a 4.6/5 score, and its onboarding process is rated 4.7/5. Multiple reviews commend its straightforward, user-friendly interface that reduces staff training time and simplifies daily operations. Feedback highlights how staff quickly adapt to Counter’s clean layout, whether on desktop or mobile, enabling efficient management from anywhere.
Sedna, lacking any recent reviews or ratings, offers no data on usability or onboarding. Without user feedback, it's impossible to judge its interface or learning curve. Given Counter's demonstrated ease, it clearly leads here. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including a built-in channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, housekeeper module, group bookings, multi-currency support, and guest CRM. Its integration with platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, and Goki further enhances operational capabilities.
Sedna provides no detailed feature list or comparison data, leaving its functionality entirely unknown. With Counter's proven feature set and extensive integrations, it clearly offers more tangible tools for your team. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with recent reviews praising the quick, responsive assistance from team members like Evelyn and Max. Users mention that support is always available and helpful, although some note slower responses in different time zones.
Sedna’s customer support information is unavailable, and no reviews exist to gauge its responsiveness or quality. Given Counter’s high support scores and recent positive feedback, it’s the safer choice. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki, plus payment processors like Stripe. These integrations allow your hotel to connect seamlessly with booking platforms, payment gateways, and access controls.
Sedna has no verified integrations or partner data available. Without integrations, your hotel risks siloed operations and manual workarounds. Counter's robust ecosystem makes it a more connected and streamlined system. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s user ratings reflect a 4.73/5 overall score, based on 54 recent reviews, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers across various small hotel segments, especially hostels, praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
Sedna has no ratings or recent reviews to compare, leaving its user satisfaction entirely unverified. The difference in credibility and proven performance favors Counter. Edge: Counter.
Pricing details for Counter are not explicitly provided, but it is free to use, making it highly accessible for small and startup hostels. Sedna’s pricing is also unavailable, which limits direct comparison, but the lack of transparency raises questions about affordability and value.
Counter’s free model, combined with its extensive features and support, offers strong value, especially for budget-conscious properties. Sedna’s unknown costs could be a risk. Edge: Counter.
Counter by Counter is a well-established PMS with a proven track record, extensive features, and a global presence. Its high ratings and recent reviews confirm it delivers on ease of use, support, and functionality, especially for small hotels and hostels.
Sedna PMS by Sedna remains an untested option, with no recent reviews or visible customer feedback. Its lack of transparency and proven performance makes it a risky choice unless your hotel is prepared for an experimental system.
If your priority is reliability, proven user satisfaction, and comprehensive features, Counter is the clear choice. Choose Counter for a solution with a strong foundation, extensive integrations, and a community of satisfied hoteliers. Opt for Sedna only if you’re prepared to evaluate its capabilities firsthand and accept the uncertainties that come with less market visibility.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Sedna PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sedna PMS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Sedna PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Sedna 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问