The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Shalom PMS 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Shalom PMS 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Shalom PMS |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Shalom PMS |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Shalom PMS |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Shalom PMS |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your priority is often to find a solution that simplifies operations, enhances guest experience, and offers reliable support. Counter by Counter and Shalom PMS by Shalom PMS both aim to address these needs but differ significantly in their market presence, feature set, and user feedback. Counter has established itself as a well-rated, feature-rich solution popular among hostels and small properties, while Shalom PMS’s offerings are less visible and have fewer recent reviews. Will the more proven, reviewed product meet your hotel’s needs better?
Counter’s extensive review base and high ratings suggest a mature, trusted platform, whereas Shalom PMS’s lack of recent feedback makes it harder to gauge current performance. Your decision hinges on whether you value proven reliability and a broad feature set—or are exploring a less tested, potentially customizable alternative.
Counter stands out as a specialized PMS designed for hostels, with over 54 recent reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating, indicating strong customer satisfaction. Shalom PMS, with no recent reviews and a score of zero, offers no current indication of user experience or satisfaction, making Counter the more dependable choice.
Counter’s feature set includes a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, and a suite of operational tools, all highly rated for usability. Shalom PMS lacks publicly available features or user feedback, which makes it difficult to assess its suitability for your hotel’s operational needs.
Counter’s global presence and tailored hostel features suggest it’s more suited for your team if you operate in regions like Europe, North America, or Asia Pacific. Shalom PMS, without regional or segment data, offers no clear market fit or proven track record, raising questions about its effectiveness.
Do you prefer a well-reviewed, established system with proven features, or are you willing to test a less documented solution that might require more vetting?
If your hotel needs a reliable, user-friendly PMS with integrated channel management, payment processing, and automation, go with Counter. Its broad feature set—19 unique features tailored for hostels—means you’re getting an all-in-one platform proven to improve operational efficiency.
If your primary focus is on a simple, lightweight system that can potentially integrate with other tools, and you’re confident in trialing an untested product, Shalom PMS might be worth exploring. However, without recent reviews or verified integrations, its capacity to support your hotel’s growth remains uncertain.
For hotels that prioritize automation, reporting, and multi-platform management, Counter is the safer, more proven option. Conversely, if your property is flexible, tech-savvy, and looking for a possibly customizable solution without current user validation, consider Shalom PMS—but proceed with caution.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s interface is consistently praised for its simplicity, with a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating based on 54 reviews. Users highlight how intuitive and straightforward it is for staff to learn, with many noting quick onboarding and minimal training needs.
Shalom PMS offers no recent reviews or user feedback, making it impossible to assess its usability. The lack of data suggests it’s either niche or untested, which could imply a steeper learning curve or inconsistent user experience.
Your team will likely find Counter’s familiar, clean design easier to adopt, especially given its positive support feedback and documented usability. The absence of recent reviews for Shalom PMS leaves its ease of use in question.
Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 distinct features, including a channel manager, booking engine, POS integration, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking—all highly rated by users. Shalom PMS’s feature set is either undisclosed or nonexistent in documented sources, offering no clear advantage or comparable functionality.
Counter’s comprehensive suite supports daily operations, revenue management, and guest interactions, making it robust for small to medium properties. Without detailed feature data or user feedback, Shalom PMS cannot be confidently recommended for advanced operational needs.
The feature count and detailed reviews favor Counter, especially for properties aiming for automation and multi-channel distribution. Shalom PMS remains an unknown in its capabilities.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support team earns a 4.96/5 rating based on 54 reviews, with users praising their quick, professional responsiveness. Specific testimonials mention support staff like Evelyn and Max for their helpfulness, even amid system bugs.
Shalom PMS provides no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving its support quality uncertain. The lack of publicly available customer support feedback suggests it’s either untested or less responsive.
For your team, reliable support is critical; Counter’s proven high support ratings provide peace of mind. The absence of support data for Shalom PMS makes it a risky choice if ongoing assistance is a priority.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s overall rating of 4.73/5 from 54 reviews demonstrates strong, recent user satisfaction, especially among hostel operators. Property types like hostels and boutique hotels rate it at 4.75/5, reflecting ongoing confidence and positive experiences.
Shalom PMS has no recent reviews or scores, making it impossible to determine user sentiment or satisfaction levels. Its lack of feedback and engagement suggests it is less trusted or less widely adopted.
Hoteliers seeking proven satisfaction should favor Counter, which has recent, high ratings from a diverse range of property types. Shalom PMS’s current standing remains unverified.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly disclose its pricing but is described as a free, no-trial platform tailored for hostels. Additional features like integrations or advanced modules may incur costs, but basic use appears accessible without upfront fees.
Shalom PMS similarly offers no publicly available pricing details, leaving potential users to contact sales directly. Its lack of transparent pricing makes comparison difficult.
If cost is a decisive factor, Counter’s free-to-use model, combined with its feature set, offers significant value. The cost structure of Shalom PMS remains uncertain, discouraging quick decision-making.
Not ideal if you require complex revenue management, extensive customization, or large-scale property features beyond hostels.
Counter best suits properties prioritizing ease, automation, and integrations, especially in regions where it already has a strong presence.
Not ideal if you require a mature, well-supported system with proven customer support and extensive feature sets.
Given the lack of recent feedback, Shalom PMS may be better suited for early-stage properties or as a supplementary tool rather than a core management system.
Counter is a well-established, feature-rich PMS trusted by over 54 hoteliers in the past six months, with recent reviews confirming its ease of use, support quality, and operational capabilities. Its high ratings and broad regional presence position it as a reliable choice for small to medium properties, especially hostels.
Shalom PMS’s lack of recent reviews and transparent features makes it difficult to recommend confidently. Unless your property is open to testing less established systems and can accept the uncertainty around support and functionality, Counter should be your first choice.
If you need a proven, supported, and comprehensive PMS to streamline your hostel or small hotel operations, Counter offers the certainty and performance you require. Conversely, if you are exploring new platforms with flexible ambitions and no pressing operational needs, Shalom PMS might warrant further investigation—but with caution.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Shalom PMS |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Shalom PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Shalom PMS |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Shalom PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shalom PMS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Shalom PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Shalom PMS 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问