The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
siesta solutions 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 siesta solutions 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
siesta solutions |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
siesta solutions |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
siesta solutions |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
siesta solutions |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel’s specific needs and operational complexity guide the decision. Counter by Counter and Siesta extranet by Siesta Solutions aim to streamline management tasks, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market presence. Counter offers a comprehensive suite, especially suited for hostels, with robust reviews backing its performance, while Siesta’s solution remains unreviewed and less established. Given the data, which product truly meets your hotel’s requirements?
Counter by Counter is designed primarily for hostels and small accommodations, emphasizing ease of use, automation, and integration. Its recent reviews — totaling 54 with a 4.73/5 rating — underscore its popularity among hostel operators, especially with features like mobile management and integrated POS. Conversely, Siesta extranet appears to have no recent reviews, making its actual user experience and support less verifiable.
Counter stands out with a high overall rating, a 4.96/5 customer support score, and a 91% likelihood of recommendation. Siesta’s absence of recent feedback leaves its reliability and user satisfaction uncertain. Do you prioritize proven performance backed by recent user reviews, or are you willing to explore an unreviewed system?
If your hotel is a hostel or a small property seeking a user-friendly, all-in-one solution, Counter is the clear choice. Its features include channel management, payment processing, booking engine, and guest CRM, all highly rated and supported by a strong user base. For hotels seeking a verified, well-supported PMS with extensive integrations and proven customer satisfaction, Counter’s 54 reviews and recent ratings make it the more reliable option.
Siesta extranet might attract larger or more complex properties due to its centralization capabilities, but without recent reviews or a demonstrated support network, risk remains high. If your goal is operational efficiency with trusted support, Counter’s data-backed reputation outweighs Siesta’s unverified claims.
Counter scores an impressive 4.6/5 for ease of use, with many users highlighting its intuitive interface, quick staff onboarding, and mobile accessibility. Reviewers mention it is "clear, simple, and easy to understand," enabling staff to learn quickly without extensive training. Support interactions are also praised, with users noting fast, helpful responses from the Counter team.
Siesta extranet has no recent reviews or user feedback available, making any assessment of its usability purely speculative. Given Counter’s high ratings and proven user satisfaction, Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking — features critical for efficient hostel operations. Notably, it integrates with popular partners like Stripe, Cloudbeds, and SiteMinder, enhancing operational flexibility.
In contrast, Siesta extranet’s features are unlisted, and there are no verified integrations or advanced management tools reported. Without concrete details, Counter’s feature set clearly surpasses Siesta’s, especially for hostels and small properties. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support is rated at 4.96/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and professionalism, notably mentioning team members like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate the quick troubleshooting and ongoing improvements, though some mention slower support in certain time zones.
Siesta extranet has no recent reviews or support ratings available, leaving its responsiveness and quality unverified. In the absence of verified support data, Counter’s established reputation makes it the safer choice. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Channel Managers like SiteMinder and Goki, and payment processors like Stripe. These integrations facilitate smooth operations across booking channels, payments, and access management. Siesta extranet has no verified integrations, limiting its capacity to connect with other platforms.
Given the extensive integration network of Counter, your hotel benefits from a more connected and flexible system. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s ratings reflect strong user satisfaction — a 4.73/5 overall score, 4.6/5 for ease of use, and 4.96/5 for customer support, based on 54 recent reviews. Hoteliers, especially hostels, report high confidence in its reliability, with comments like “best PMS for hostels” and “responsive support.”
Siesta’s lack of reviews prevents any meaningful comparison. Until real user feedback emerges, Counter’s proven high ratings clearly position it as the preferred choice. Edge: Counter.
Both products do not list explicit pricing models, but Counter emphasizes no implementation fee or subscription charges like monthly flat fees or per-room costs, suggesting a straightforward approach. Siesta extranet also appears to be free or no-cost, yet without detailed information, exact comparisons are not possible.
Given Counter’s transparent, predictable approach and extensive feature set, your hotel can plan accordingly. Siesta’s pricing remains uncertain, making Counter the more reliable choice for budgeting.
Counter by Counter is a well-established, feature-rich PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, with a proven track record backed by recent reviews. Its extensive integrations, high support ratings, and user-friendly design make it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers.
Siesta extranet, while potentially suitable for larger properties, remains unreviewed and lacks verifiable data on support and features. Until concrete user feedback is available, Counter’s performance and support history make it the safer, more confident selection.
In summary, if your hotel values proven functionality, recent positive reviews, and a broad feature set, Counter by Counter is the clear choice. Siesta extranet might appeal to larger, more complex operations, but the lack of recent user validation makes it a riskier option.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
siesta solutions |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Siesta extranet 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
siesta solutions |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Siesta extranet 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Siesta extranet 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Siesta extranet:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,siesta solutions 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问