The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Sigh Ulyses 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Sigh Ulyses 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Sigh Ulyses by Sigh Ulyses hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Counter is a property management system (PMS) built specifically for hostels, offering a suite of features designed to streamline daily operations, while Sigh Ulyses focuses primarily on customer review analysis and feedback management, with no concrete PMS functionality. Given this, your decision should consider whether you need a full PMS or a tool to enhance guest satisfaction insights.
Counter’s clear focus on hostel management, coupled with its extensive feature set and high user ratings, makes it a compelling choice if operational efficiency is your priority. Sigh Ulyses, on the other hand, offers no current reviews or proven hotel management features, making it less suitable if your goal is to manage reservations, housekeeping, and revenue effectively.
So, is your hotel seeking an all-in-one PMS or a review analysis tool? The answer will guide your choice.
Counter is a PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, with 54 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 4.73/5, emphasizing its usability, support, and feature depth. Sigh Ulyses, lacking any reviews and not identified as a PMS, offers no direct management features or recent hotel-specific feedback, making it difficult to evaluate its effectiveness for hotel operations.
Counter’s review highlights include its user-friendly interface, automation capabilities, and support responsiveness, with users claiming it’s “the best PMS for hostels.” Conversely, Sigh Ulyses provides an AI-driven review analysis platform, but without specific hotel management features or recent user feedback, it cannot be directly compared on operational grounds.
Ultimately, Counter’s proven hotel-specific functionality and recent reviews give it the edge for management needs. Are you looking for a proven PMS or a review analysis tool? Your answer clarifies the better fit.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive PMS with channel management, booking engine, guest CRM, and reporting, Counter is the clear choice. Its features cater directly to hostels, with 19 unique functionalities, a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating, and verified integrations with seven partners like Stripe and SiteMinder.
If, however, your goal is to analyze customer feedback, extract insights, and improve guest satisfaction through AI summaries and recommendations, Sigh Ulyses might be relevant. But with no recent reviews, hotel segment-specific data, or operational features, it’s unsuitable as your primary management system.
For operational efficiency and management control, Counter is the definitive pick. For feedback insights without management capabilities, Sigh Ulyses doesn’t currently stand out.
Counter’s user interface receives a 4.6/5 rating, with reviews praising its intuitive, clean design and quick staff onboarding. Users find it straightforward to learn and teach, with positive feedback on its mobile app and ease of calendar management.
Sigh Ulyses, lacking any user ratings or reviews, offers no data on usability or onboarding experience. Without evidence of its interface or ease of adoption, it’s impossible to compare usability.
Edge: Counter. Its high ease-of-use rating, recent positive reviews, and clear interface make it the better choice for immediate staff training and daily operations.
Counter offers 19 distinct features, including channel management, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and housekeepings modules. These features directly support daily hotel operations, revenue tracking, and guest management.
Sigh Ulyses provides no features explicitly tailored for hotel management. It is an AI review analysis platform, not a PMS, and offers no management functions or operational tools.
Given the feature counts and functionality, Counter’s comprehensive suite makes it the leader for hotel management. Sigh Ulyses lacks management features entirely; therefore, Counter has the advantage.
Counter’s support team is rated 4.96/5, with recent reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses from staff like Evelyn and Max. Hoteliers appreciate its responsiveness, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, though some mention slower support in certain time zones.
Sigh Ulyses has no published customer support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess support quality. Its lack of recent hotel-specific feedback further diminishes confidence.
Edge: Counter. Its high support ratings and recent positive reviews demonstrate a reliable, responsive support team essential for operational continuity.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including channel managers WuBook, SiteMinder, and Cloudbeds, plus Stripe for payments. These integrations facilitate multi-platform booking, payment processing, and access control, essential for modern property management.
Sigh Ulyses does not list any integrations or partnerships, focusing solely on AI review analysis. Its lack of operational integrations makes it less applicable for managing hotel systems.
Counter’s multiple integrations give it the clear advantage for streamlining management workflows. Sigh Ulyses is not comparable in this area.
Counter’s 54 recent reviews yield an overall rating of 4.73/5, with a 91% likelihood to recommend among hostel operators and small hotels. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, especially noting its suitability for hostel management.
Sigh Ulyses has no reviews or ratings from hoteliers, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or property-specific feedback.
Based on recent data, Counter is the higher-rated solution by a wide margin. Sigh Ulyses lacks enough hotel-specific feedback to compare meaningfully.
Counter does not publicly disclose pricing details but offers a free, easy-to-use platform tailored for hostels without mention of hidden fees or implementation costs. It appears accessible for small properties and startups.
Sigh Ulyses also offers no explicit pricing info, focusing on AI feedback analysis. Given its SaaS nature, it likely operates on a subscription model, but details are unavailable.
Both products lack transparent pricing, emphasizing the need for direct vendor contact. For management, Counter’s value is clearer given its feature set and recent reviews.
Not ideal if your property requires advanced revenue management, extensive reporting, or sophisticated group booking features. Larger hotel chains with complex operations should look elsewhere.
Not ideal if you need a PMS, reservation management, or operational tools. Sigh Ulyses is best suited for feedback-driven strategies rather than property management.
Counter is a full-featured PMS designed specifically for hostels and small hotels, with 19 management features, high user ratings, and proven integrations. Its focus on operational efficiency and ease of use makes it suitable for properties seeking to streamline daily tasks and increase occupancy.
Sigh Ulyses, lacking management features and recent hotel reviews, is primarily an AI review analysis tool. It does not currently support hotel operations or revenue management, limiting its utility for property managers.
If your goal is comprehensive management, Counter is the clear choice. If your focus is on extracting insights from customer reviews, Sigh Ulyses may be useful, but it’s not a management system.
This comparative review underscores Counter’s strong management capabilities backed by recent high ratings and a broad feature set, making it the better option for hoteliers seeking operational control. Sigh Ulyses is not positioned as a PMS and lacks hotel-specific data; for management purposes, it falls short. Your decision should align with whether you prioritize operational efficiency or guest feedback analysis, with Counter clearly leading for management needs.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Sigh Ulyses 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Sigh Ulyses |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Sigh Ulyses 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sigh Ulyses 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Sigh Ulyses:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Sigh Ulyses 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问