The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Sign Request by Box hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both products aim to streamline property management, but Counter offers a more established, feature-rich PMS tailored primarily for hostels, while Box appears less developed with limited reviews and features. Are you prioritizing ease of use and comprehensive integrations or seeking a more niche solution?
Counter's 54 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 4.73/5 make it the more reliable choice. Conversely, Box's lack of recent feedback and absence of detailed ratings suggest it’s still emerging. Which product will better support your property’s growth and efficiency?
Counter is a full-featured PMS designed specifically for hostels, with a suite of operational tools like channel management, booking engine, payment processing, and housekeeping. It has been rated highly for ease of use (4.6/5), customer support (4.96/5), and value (4.8/5), backed by 54 recent reviews, indicating strong user confidence.
Box, on the other hand, offers little verifiable information—no recent reviews or detailed feature list—making it difficult to evaluate its suitability. Its current market presence is limited, with no regional data or user feedback to confirm its effectiveness or ease of use.
Given this, Counter’s well-established reputation and recent user feedback make it a more dependable option for hotels seeking an integrated management system. Is your priority a proven platform with ongoing support or exploring a less proven alternative?
If your hotel operates primarily within the hostel segment or values a system with channel management, payment, and guest CRM features, go with Counter. Its 19 exclusive features and verified integrations with platforms like Stripe and SiteMinder make it ideal for streamlining operations and increasing revenue.
If your property is a boutique or city center hotel seeking a simple, perhaps standalone solution, and you’re willing to experiment with a less proven platform, then consider Box. However, keep in mind that its limited reviews and unclear feature set suggest it may lack the robustness needed for daily operations.
For most hoteliers, especially those needing a trusted, feature-rich PMS, Counter is the safer, more strategic choice.
Counter boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.6/5 and intuitive interfaces on both desktop and mobile, praised consistently in recent reviews. Support staff, especially Evelyn and Max, are recognized for their quick, helpful responses, making onboarding smoother.
Box provides no detailed user experience data or recent reviews, which hampers assessment. Its ease of use remains unverified, and without user feedback, it's unclear how intuitive or supportive the platform is for your team.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking. These tools are designed to streamline operations for hostels and small hotels alike.
Box’s feature set remains unspecified, with no verified features documented or user reviews mentioning specific functionalities. This absence suggests that Counter’s feature-rich platform is currently the more capable and reliable option.
Edge: Counter.
Counter's customer support is rated at 4.96/5 based on recent reviews, with users highlighting the responsiveness of staff like Evelyn and Max. Hoteliers frequently mention quick, helpful assistance, even during system bugs or setup.
Box does not provide recent review data or specific support ratings, making it impossible to assess the quality of its customer service. Given Counter’s proven support track record, it clearly outshines Box in this critical area.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including channel managers like WuBook and Goki, payment platforms like Stripe, and revenue tools like FLYR. These integrations help streamline multiple revenue streams and operational management.
Box has no verified integrations or partnerships listed, indicating a limited or undeveloped ecosystem at present. For properties looking to expand distribution channels and automate income, Counter’s integrations are a significant advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s 54 recent reviews average 4.73/5, with many users praising its ease of use, reliability, and support, especially among hostels. Larger property types like boutique hotels and city centers are less represented but tend to give favorable ratings when evaluated.
Box offers no recent reviews or ratings, leaving hoteliers without recent validation of its performance. Its limited feedback suggests that Counter’s established reputation makes it the safer choice for most properties.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not list specific pricing but is known for its transparent, subscription-based model with no implementation fees, and a free plan for basic users. Its value is reflected in its feature set and support quality.
Box’s pricing information is unavailable, and without recent reviews or a clear pricing structure, it's difficult to assess its affordability or value.
If budget is a concern, Counter’s clear and flexible pricing model offers better certainty.
Counter is best suited for hostels, small hotels, and boutique properties that want a proven, easy-to-use system.
Box currently appears most suitable for properties in early stage evaluation or with basic operational needs.
Counter stands out as a fully-featured, well-reviewed PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, with proven integrations and excellent support. Its broad feature set and recent positive feedback make it the more dependable choice for most properties.
Choose Counter if you need a system that supports your daily operations, offers extensive integrations, and comes with responsive support. It is ideal for hoteliers who prioritize reliability and a comprehensive management platform.
Opt for Box only if your needs are extremely basic, and you’re willing to accept the risks associated with limited recent data and unknown features. Its current market presence and review profile do not support a strong recommendation.
In summary, for most hotels seeking a secure, proven management system with ongoing support and expanding features, Counter is the clear winner.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Sign Request 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sign Request 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Sign Request:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Box 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问