The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 99 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 SIHOT 用户则强调 advanced support and training, 快速解决问题, 集成和自定义界面。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
+
Advanced Support and Training
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
快速解决问题
▾
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
+
集成和自定义界面
▾
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
+
灵活性和适应性
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
−
用户界面和现代化
▾
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
−
财务报告和定制
▾
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
−
详细的报告和分析
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #40 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #46 4 条评价 | #26 21 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #32 2 条评价 | #16 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | #30 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #35 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #44 4 条评价 | #30 11 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #43 4 条评价 | #25 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #28 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #17 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | #25 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and SIHOT by SIHOT hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational scope. Both systems serve property management functions but differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Counter is tailored for small to medium hostels, emphasizing simplicity and ease of use, while SIHOT offers a comprehensive, modular solution suitable for larger, more complex hotel operations.
Your decision should reflect whether you prioritize a user-friendly, cost-effective system or a highly customizable, extensive platform. Do you want a straightforward PMS dedicated to hostels, or a flexible solution that can scale with your property’s growth?
Counter by Counter is a free, lightweight PMS designed exclusively for hostels and small accommodations. Its interface is straightforward, focusing on managing reservations, check-ins, and check-outs with minimal fuss, making it ideal for property owners seeking simplicity.
In contrast, SIHOT offers a broad suite of hotel management functionalities that extend far beyond basic operations. It supports complex multi-property setups, advanced revenue management, and detailed reporting, catering to larger hotels and chains. While Counter is praised for its ease of use and rapid onboarding, SIHOT’s extensive features come with a steeper learning curve.
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but Counter’s minimalism may limit scalability, whereas SIHOT’s robustness can accommodate growth and diversification. Which approach aligns better with your current priorities?
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or small property with a focus on ease and affordability, Counter is the clear choice. Its high ease-of-use rating (4.6/5 vs SIHOT’s 4.49/5) and positive reviews highlight its suitability for teams that need quick setup and minimal training. Conversely, SIHOT’s modular, feature-rich platform—offered in more installation options and supporting extensive multi-property management—fits larger hotels or chains seeking comprehensive control.
For properties that prioritize a simple, fast-to-deploy solution, Counter’s free model and positive user feedback (91% likelihood to recommend) make it attractive. If advanced features like revenue management, detailed analytics, and multi-channel integrations are necessary, SIHOT’s broader capabilities (29 unique features versus Counter’s none) are more appropriate.
Your hotel's complexity, size, and growth plans should guide this choice. Are you looking for a straightforward system or a flexible, deep-management platform?
Counter is designed with a user-friendly interface optimized for mobile browsers, rated 4.6/5 for ease of use. Users consistently praise its intuitive layout, quick onboarding (4.7/5), and minimal training requirements, especially suitable for staff unfamiliar with PMS software.
SIHOT, while also rated well at 4.49/5, has a more complex interface with a steeper learning curve, reflecting its broader feature set. Its onboarding is efficient (4.73/5), and support is well-regarded, but some users note that the system’s interface can feel somewhat dated and less straightforward to new users.
Edge: Counter.
SIHOT offers 29 unique features, including gift vouchers, task management, online check-in/out, integrated payment terminals, digital registration, and revenue management modules. These functionalities support intricate operations, multi-property management, and dynamic guest experiences.
Counter, on the other hand, provides 19 shared features but lacks many advanced modules present in SIHOT, such as online check-in/out, guest communication, or integrated POS. It excels in core hostel management functions but doesn’t support extensive revenue or event management.
For hotels that need advanced features like digital guest communication, revenue optimization, or complex task management, SIHOT’s feature set is superior. If your focus is on simple, essential PMS functions, Counter’s lean approach suffices.
Edge: SIHOT.
Counter’s support ratings are excellent at 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting fast, responsive assistance from staff like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate the quick problem resolution and ongoing system improvements, even as they note some delays in support during certain time zones.
SIHOT’s support is also well-rated at 4.62/5, with many praising their online training, CRM engagement, and quick issue resolution. However, some reviews mention initial reluctance in responsibility-taking, suggesting room for more proactive communication.
Edge: Counter.
SIHOT boasts 60 verified integrations, including major partners like SiteMinder, Omnibees, Profitroom, and others. Its extensive integration support simplifies connecting with revenue, channel management, and payment platforms.
Counter has 7 verified partners, including Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki. While it integrates well with popular platforms like site management and POS systems, its partner ecosystem is narrower.
For hotel operators prioritizing extensive third-party integrations, SIHOT’s large partner network is a significant advantage. Counter’s integrations are more limited but sufficient for hostel-specific needs.
Edge: SIHOT.
Counter has a strong overall rating of 4.73/5 based on 54 reviews, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers in hostels and small accommodations specifically praise its simplicity and support, with one stating, "Best PMS for hostels."
SIHOT’s slightly higher overall rating of 4.77/5 (39 reviews) and a 93% recommendation rate reflect its broader appeal to larger properties. Users especially appreciate its multi-property management and detailed analytics, with one reviewer calling it “a very flexible and dynamic system.”
Given the recency of reviews, SIHOT’s higher rating and greater number of reviews give it a slight edge in overall hotelier perception.
Edge: SIHOT.
Both products do not publicly disclose detailed pricing, but Counter is offered as a free PMS tailored for hostels, with no implementation or monthly fees. This makes it accessible and low-risk for small properties.
SIHOT’s pricing is also not openly listed, but it typically involves a custom quote based on modules, installation type (cloud, SaaS, on-premise), and property size. Its cost structure is likely higher and more suited for larger hotels with complex needs.
For small properties on a tight budget or seeking a free solution, Counter’s no-cost model is advantageous. Larger properties with specific feature needs should expect a tailored quote from SIHOT.
Not ideal if your property:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Counter is a tailored, free PMS designed specifically for hostels and small accommodations, emphasizing ease of use and rapid onboarding. Its limited feature set and narrower integrations make it perfect for properties seeking straightforward management without complexity.
SIHOT offers a comprehensive, modular platform suitable for large or multi-property hotels. Its extensive features, integrations, and customization options make it ideal for complex operational environments, but with a steeper learning curve and higher cost.
Choose Counter if you prioritize simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and speed. Opt for SIHOT if your property requires a flexible, scalable system that can handle advanced functions and growth.
If your hotel operates as a small hostel or boutique property needing rapid, easy management, Counter is the best fit. For larger hotels aiming for a fully integrated, customizable management experience, SIHOT is the more suitable choice.
In conclusion, your decision should hinge on the complexity of your operations, growth ambitions, and feature requirements.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many users commend the advanced support team and the online training academy, which make it easy to resolve issues and reduce the learning curve for n... Many users commend the advanced support team and the online training academy, which make it easy to resolve issues and reduce the learning curve for new employees. Regular CRM calls are also appreciated for keeping open lines of communication.
SIHOT 因其快速有效的问题解决能力而受到称赞。然而,一些评论批评其最初不愿承担某些问题的责任,强调沟通方面有待改进。
SIHOT 积极支持并参与自定义界面的创建,显著简化了与其他系统的集成。这确保了无缝运营,并增强了现代酒店业务所需的灵活性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
有人呼吁对 SIHOT 的用户界面进行更现代化和直观的更新,用户指出,与市场上的其他解决方案相比,当前的系统设计感觉过时了。
虽然此功能很有用,但一些用户希望财务报告定制能够更快地适应,以更好地满足特定区域的财务需求。这些反馈表明,定制功能需要增强。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 SIHOT 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SIHOT 提供 60 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。SIHOT:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,SIHOT 的为 74。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问