The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing.
Skyware Systems 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Revenue management module.
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Skyware Systems 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Skyware Systems
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Skyware Systems
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | #71 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Skyware Systems
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | #66 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Skyware Systems
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #50 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Skyware Systems hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline operations, but Counter is tailored for hostels with a focus on ease and automation, whereas Skyware offers a broader suite of features suited to larger hotels and multi-property operations.
Counter’s more recent reviews and higher ratings make it the more reliable choice for hoteliers prioritizing user experience and support. Are you ready to see which platform aligns best with your property’s goals?
Counter and Skyware Systems serve different hotel types with distinct capabilities. Counter, designed for hostels, emphasizes simplicity, mobile management, and automation, helping small to medium properties operate efficiently. Skyware, with over 30 years of hospitality experience, provides a comprehensive suite suitable for larger, multi-property hotels that need extensive operational tools.
Counter’s focus on user-friendly features and recent positive reviews, including a 4.73/5 overall rating from 54 recent reviews, contrast with Skyware’s lack of recent review data and zero ratings. Do you prioritize ease of use or advanced, multi-faceted features?
If your hotel is a hostel or small property seeking straightforward management and automation, Counter is the better fit. It offers an intuitive interface, high customer support ratings, and features like payment processing, POS integration, and channel management — all crucial for busy hostels.
Conversely, if your hotel is larger, manages multiple properties, or needs features like conference booking, spa management, or extensive integration options, Skyware’s broader suite could be more suitable. However, with no recent reviews or ratings, Skyware's real-world performance remains uncertain.
Counter boasts a high ease of use rating of 4.6/5 based on 54 reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process. Many reviewers mention how staff adapt quickly, and the platform’s mobile-friendly design allows management from anywhere.
Skyware Systems shows no recent review data or user ratings, making it impossible to assess its ease of use. Given Counter’s strong recent feedback, edge: Counter.
Counter offers 18 shared features plus one unique feature — payment processing — that Skyware lacks. It also integrates with platforms like Stripe and Goki, enabling automated payments and access management.
Skyware’s features include modules for spa, conference, and restaurant management, with 5 features unique to it, like revenue management and gift vouchers. With more features and recent reviews, edge: Counter.
Counter’s support is rated at 4.96/5 from 54 reviews, with many users describing the team as fast, helpful, and professional, especially mentioning staff like Evelyn and Max. Customers appreciate quick responses and ongoing improvements despite ongoing bugs.
Skyware lacks recent reviews or ratings, so its support performance remains unverified. Based on available data, edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major platforms like Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, and Stripe, providing essential connectivity. Skyware offers 15 verified integrations, including notable systems like GuestCentric, Revinate, and OpenKey, covering broader operational needs.
While Skyware has more integrations, Counter’s partnerships are more relevant for small to medium properties. Given the recent reviews emphasizing platform stability, edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating, along with a 91% likelihood to recommend, demonstrate strong user satisfaction, especially among hostels. Users highlight its simplicity, support, and automation as key advantages.
Skyware’s data is outdated, with no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Therefore, the clear winner is: edge: Counter.
Both platforms do not publicly list pricing details, indicating a custom quote process. Counter’s absence of pricing information suggests it may be more affordable for smaller properties, while Skyware’s extensive features might come with higher costs suited for larger hotels.
Not ideal if you need advanced revenue management, extensive spa or conference features, or multi-property capabilities.
Not ideal if your property is small, hostelry-focused, or prioritizes ease of use over extensive feature sets.
Counter’s core advantage is its simplicity, modern interface, and targeted features for hostels and small hotels. Its recent reviews and high ratings make it a reliable choice for properties prioritizing ease, automation, and support.
Skyware offers a broad suite of tools that can support large hotels and multi-property operations, but the lack of recent reviews and ratings makes its current performance uncertain. If your focus is on user experience and recent positive feedback, Counter is the clear winner.
For small to medium properties, especially hostels, Counter’s focus on automation and ease of use makes it the superior choice. Larger hotels or multi-property groups should consider Skyware’s extensive modules, but should request current references before committing.
In conclusion, if recent user feedback and support are your priority, Counter stands out. For advanced features and industry breadth, Skyware might be appealing — but only if you can verify its current performance.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Skyware Systems
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Skyware Systems 共享 18 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Skyware Systems
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 综合 CRS |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Skyware Systems 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Skyware Systems 提供 15 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Skyware Systems:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Skyware Systems 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问