The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Tesipro by Tesipro hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but Counter focuses on simplicity and ease of use for hostels, while Tesipro offers a broader suite of features suited for larger, more complex properties.
Counter excels in its user-friendly design, quick onboarding, and strong support, making it an ideal choice for small to mid-sized hostels. Tesipro, on the other hand, provides extensive features for full-service hotels and chains, but its lack of recent reviews and lower ratings make it a less reliable option right now.
Counter’s core advantage is its dedicated focus on hostels, with a straightforward interface that staff can learn fast. Tesipro aims at larger establishments needing extensive integrations and modules, but it has zero recent reviews, raising questions about its current performance and user experience.
Counter is built around ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating for usability and over 50 reviews, most recent from the last six months, indicating current active users. Tesipro’s absence of recent user feedback makes it difficult to assess whether it keeps pace with modern hotel management needs, but its feature set suggests a focus on larger operations.
The key difference lies in their target audiences: Counter is designed for small, independent properties like hostels, while Tesipro caters to bigger hotels and chains. Would your team benefit most from a simple, reliable PMS or a comprehensive, scalable platform? That’s the core of their divergence.
If your hotel is a hostel or small property that prioritizes ease of use, quick setup, and responsive customer support, Counter is your better choice. It’s especially beneficial if your team needs to manage check-ins, bookings, and payments from mobile devices on the go, supported by a 4.96/5 support rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend.
Conversely, if your property is a large hotel or chain with complex operations requiring advanced modules like EPoS, integrated CRS, shift planning, and real-time reporting, Tesipro’s extensive feature list makes it appealing. But without recent reviews, you should consider whether the platform’s current performance matches its feature promise.
For hoteliers focused on hostels or small independent hotels seeking simplicity, Counter’s reputation and recent user feedback clearly favor it. Larger properties with the need for extensive integrations and modules might lean toward Tesipro, but caution is advised given the lack of recent feedback.
Counter’s UI scores a 4.6/5 based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface. Hoteliers emphasize how fast staff can be trained and how seamlessly the system integrates into daily operations, with support from responsive team members like Evelyn and Max.
Tesipro’s usability data is unavailable, and its lack of recent reviews leaves its ease of use uncertain. Larger, complex systems often come with steeper learning curves, and without current feedback, it’s hard to gauge whether Tesipro has addressed usability issues.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 16 shared features with Tesipro, plus three exclusive modules: guest CRM, guest profiles, and ancillary revenue tracking. Tesipro’s 28 unique features include specialized modules like Spa & Wellness, EPoS, task management, digital registration, and real-time status updates—ideal for full-service hotels.
Counter’s features are more basic, fitting small properties that need core functionalities. Tesipro’s extensive modules support larger, complex operations but may be excessive for smaller properties. Ultimately, if you need a broad feature set, Tesipro wins; if simplicity suffices, Counter is better.
Edge: Tesipro.
Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness and professionalism. Specific mentions include quick replies from team members like Evelyn and Max, reinforcing confidence in their service.
Tesipro’s support reputation and recent reviews are absent, making it difficult to compare support quality. For hotel operators relying on reliable support, Counter’s current high ratings are a decisive advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter connects with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like Stripe, Cloudbeds, and WuBook. Tesipro’s 25 verified partners include major industry players such as Cendyn, RateGain, and Nonius, offering broader connectivity.
While Tesipro’s extensive integrations may appeal to larger properties needing multiple system linkages, Counter’s strategic integrations are sufficient for small to mid-sized hostels, offering streamlined operations. For your needs, the breadth of integrations in Tesipro might be overkill unless you operate at a larger scale.
Edge: Tesipro.
Counter’s recent reviews (54 reviews, last six months) reflect an average rating of 4.73/5, with a 91% likelihood of recommendation. Hoteliers in the hostel segment highlight its ease of use, quick support, and reliability.
Tesipro has no recent reviews or ratings, so we cannot determine current user satisfaction. Given the active, positive feedback for Counter, it clearly holds the higher rating among current users.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly disclose a pricing model, but it is known to be a free, no-implementation-fee PMS tailored for hostels. Tesipro’s base price starts at $1,300, but there’s no mention of ongoing monthly fees or customizable options.
Counter’s free model makes it accessible for small properties, whereas Tesipro’s cost may be justifiable for larger operations needing its extensive modules. However, the lack of current pricing details for Tesipro warrants caution.
Not ideal if your property requires multiple complex modules like spa management, detailed revenue analysis, or extensive integrations with large OTAs.
Not ideal if your property is small, independent, or prioritizes a simple, cost-effective management solution.
Counter’s core strength lies in its simplicity, active user base, and recent high ratings. It’s perfect for hostels and small properties that need an intuitive, reliable PMS without the complexity or cost of larger systems.
Tesipro offers a broad array of features but suffers from a lack of recent user feedback, making its current performance uncertain. It’s suited for large, complex hotels and chains that can benefit from its extensive modules, assuming its platform remains as robust as advertised.
If your property’s operational focus is on ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive support, Counter is the clear choice. For full-scale hotel management with advanced features, Tesipro could be suitable—if it delivers on its promises today.
In conclusion, given the current data, Counter is the stronger option due to its active user reviews, higher ratings, and proven support. Consider Tesipro only if your hotel has the resources to explore its extensive capabilities and can verify ongoing platform stability.
Note: This analysis is based on available reviews, feature comparisons, and product descriptions as of October 2023. Always verify with the vendor for up-to-date details.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Tesipro 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Tesipro 提供 25 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Tesipro:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Tesipro 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问