The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Tokeet by Tokeet hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, size, and target market. Both are property management systems (PMS), but Counter’s focus on hostels and its more established presence with recent reviews make it a more reliable choice for similar properties. Tokeet, although less reviewed, offers automation suited for vacation rentals and multi-property portfolios. Which aligns better with your hotel’s profile?
Counter is primarily tailored for hostels, inns, and small hotels with a heavy hostel focus, offering a broad feature set and recent user validation. Tokeet, on the other hand, caters to vacation rentals and multi-property managers, emphasizing automation and integrations. Are you looking for a system optimized for hostel operations or one geared toward vacation rental management?
Counter is designed specifically for hostel management, with a straightforward interface and features like booking engine, group booking, and housekeeping modules, making daily operations easier. Tokeet, meanwhile, emphasizes automation, multi-channel booking management, and integrations with platforms like Airbnb and VRBO, serving property managers with multiple rentals or brands.
Counter’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating, and robust support rated at 4.96/5, backed by 54 recent reviews. Conversely, Tokeet’s reviews are scarce or nonexistent, making it difficult to gauge current customer satisfaction or real-world effectiveness. Given this, Counter’s recent user feedback makes it the clearer choice for properties needing a reliable PMS.
Would your hotel benefit more from specialized hostel features or from a flexible rental automation system?
If your hotel operates as a hostel or inn, especially with a heavy focus on bed & breakfast, boutique, or city-center properties, Counter’s dedicated features like its booking engine, group management, and integrated POS support make it an ideal fit. If your property is a vacation rental portfolio, managing multiple listings across platforms, Tokeet’s automation and multi-platform integrations are more compelling.
Counter’s 4.73/5 overall rating, recent reviews, and features like online support, multi-lingual options, and revenue tracking make it a dependable solution for small to medium hostel-type properties. Tokeet’s strength lies in managing multiple properties and streamlining booking processes across channels, which might appeal to property managers with a broader portfolio.
If your hotel’s focus is on hostel management with streamlined operations, go with Counter. If you need automation for multiple rentals and extensive platform integrations, Tokeet might be better—though its current lack of recent reviews is a concern.
Counter’s user interface receives a high 4.6/5 rating, praised for its clarity, simplicity, and mobile-friendly design. Users describe it as “easy to learn,” with onboarding rated at 4.7/5, and staff find it quick to adopt, especially for hostel staff. Support is also highly rated at 4.96/5, with mentions of quick, helpful responses from staff members like Evelyn and Max.
Tokeet’s interface and onboarding experience are not well-documented or reviewed recently, leaving uncertainty about ease of use. Its automation features are noted as strong points, but without recent reviews, user-friendliness remains unverified. Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 exclusive features—such as integrated payment processing, booking engine, calendar view, custom rates, revenue reports, housekeeping, group management, and a mobile app. Tokeet’s feature list is less detailed, with no specific unique features highlighted or counted in available data, and no recent reviews to confirm its capabilities.
Counter’s feature depth and recent validation make it the more comprehensive PMS for hostel operations. Tokeet’s automation and multi-platform focus are strengths, but the absence of recent user feedback makes Counter’s feature set more trustworthy. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support is highly praised, with a 4.96/5 rating and reviews that mention quick, helpful responses from staff like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate their responsiveness and professionalism, especially crucial during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Tokeet’s support ratings and recent review data are unavailable, leaving support quality unclear. The lack of recent customer feedback suggests less confidence in Tokeet’s support compared to Counter’s well-reviewed service. Edge: Counter.
Counter has 7 verified partners, including prominent names like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, Stripe, WuBook, Goki, and others. Tokeet has only 3 verified integrations, with shared partners being none, and fewer connections overall.
Counter’s broader partner network enhances its ability to connect with various booking channels, payment providers, and access controls. Its extensive integrations support more flexible, connected operations. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews paint a positive picture, with a 4.73/5 rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend among its 54 reviews. Hoteliers especially appreciate its ease of use, support, and specific hostel-focused features.
Tokeet has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Its lack of recent feedback suggests that Counter’s user ratings are more reliable. Edge: Counter.
Both Counter and Tokeet do not list specific pricing details publicly, with no indication of freemium plans or trial offers. Counter is a paid PMS without mention of implementation fees, while Tokeet’s pricing remains undisclosed.
Given the lack of transparent pricing info, your best approach is to contact each vendor directly for a tailored quote based on your property size and needs.
Counter and Tokeet serve distinct markets. Counter excels in hostel management, with recent positive reviews, high usability ratings, and extensive integrations, making it a dependable choice for small, hostel-focused properties. Tokeet, although less reviewed recently, remains a strong option for multi-property rental managers needing automation and channel management.
For hostel operators or small hotels looking for reliability and proven support, Counter is the clear winner. If your focus is on managing multiple vacation rentals with automation, Tokeet could be suitable, but the current lack of recent feedback warrants caution.
In conclusion, Counter’s recent reviews, features, and support solidify its position as the preferable option for most small hotels and hostels. Tokeet’s niche appeal makes it relevant for multi-unit rental operations but requires further validation before committing.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Tokeet 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Tokeet 提供 3 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Tokeet:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Tokeet 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问