Counter vs. Uplisting: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 57 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.

Uplisting 表现出色 .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Counter 与 Uplisting 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
17
0
推荐可能性
91%
0%
易用性
4.6/5
0.0/5
客户支持
4.9/5
0.0/5
性价比
4.8/5
0.0/5
起始价格 Contact sales Contact sales
经验证的评价 57 0

Counter 与 Uplisting 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Uplisting 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Counter Counter Uplisting
优点
+ 用户界面和可用性
+ 客户支持
+ 自动化功能
+ 平台集成
缺点
错误问题
报告和收入管理
价格

Counter 对比 Uplisting:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Counter Counter Uplisting
小型(10-24 间客房) #26 28 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #46 4 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #32 2 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #31 1 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Counter Counter Uplisting
精品酒店 #31 16 条评价
豪华酒店 #44 4 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #43 4 条评价
长住酒店 #32 5 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Counter Counter Uplisting
北美 #25 8 条评价
欧洲 #20 25 条评价
亚太 #16 4 条评价
中东 #11 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Counter by Counter and Uplisting by Uplisting depends heavily on your hotel's specific needs. Counter is a dedicated PMS for hostels, offering an all-in-one workspace with extensive operational features, while Uplisting targets short-term rentals with a focus on automation and scalability. Given the more recent reviews and higher ratings, Counter emerges as the more proven option for hostels and similar properties.

Counter’s comprehensive feature set and vibrant review community make it a reliable choice. Uplisting, while promising, currently lacks the same level of user feedback and global presence. Are you ready to dive into a detailed comparison?

Is Counter or Uplisting Better for Hotels?

Counter is a property management system designed specifically for hostels, with an emphasis on ease of use and operational automation. Uplisting, by contrast, centers on streamlining short-term rental management, combining guest communication, calendar sync, and maintenance tools into one platform.

Counter’s 54 reviews and a high overall rating of 4.73/5, with recent feedback emphasizing its reliability, make it a strong choice for hostel operators. Uplisting, which has no reviews or ratings at this time, cannot match Counter’s proven track record. Do you prefer a platform supported by a large community of hostel users or one still establishing its reputation?

Counter vs Uplisting: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel primarily operates hostels or budget accommodations and values an all-in-one management platform, Counter is the better pick. Its extensive features—channel management, booking engine, POS, and more—are tailored for multi-bed properties with complex operations.

Conversely, if your property management involves multiple short-term rental units across different locations needing automation and guest communication tools, Uplisting could suit your needs. However, given the lack of recent reviews and user feedback, Counter’s established reliability makes it the safer choice for now.

Is Counter or Uplisting Easier to Use?

Counter boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.6/5 based on 54 reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process. Guests highlight that it requires minimal training, with staff adopting it swiftly, especially in hostel environments.

Uplisting, lacking user ratings and reviews, provides no data on usability. Without community feedback, it’s hard to gauge how easily your team can adapt. Therefore, Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Features: Counter or Uplisting?

Counter offers 19 unique features, including a built-in booking engine, payment processing, housekeeper modules, group booking management, online support, and multi-currency options. It also provides advanced reporting like RevPaR and ADR, and guest CRM capabilities.

Uplisting has no listed unique features in the source data. While it may include core property management functions, Counter’s feature richness, especially for hostels, stands out clearly. Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter or Uplisting?

Counter’s customer support scores a near-perfect 4.96/5, with many reviews citing quick, helpful responses from staff like Evelyn and Max. Reviewers appreciate their professionalism and responsiveness, even during system bugs.

Uplisting provides no customer support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess service quality. Given Counter’s established reputation and positive feedback, Edge: Counter.

Which Has More Integrations: Counter or Uplisting?

Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including major platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki, plus specialized solutions like FLYR and Goki. It’s well-connected within the hospitality ecosystem.

Uplisting has only two verified integrations, Duve and PriceLabs, limiting its connectivity options. For properties needing broad integration, Counter is the clear choice. Edge: Counter.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter or Uplisting?

Counter’s reviews are recent and abundant, with an overall rating of 4.73/5 from 54 reviews. Hoteliers, especially those managing hostels, praise its simplicity and support, with a 91% likelihood to recommend.

Uplisting, lacking reviews or ratings, cannot be rated by hoteliers at this time. The strength of Counter’s review base makes it the favored product for property managers seeking proven satisfaction. Edge: Counter.

How Much Do Counter and Uplisting Cost?

Counter does not publicly list pricing, but it offers a free tier and customizable plans tailored to hostels, likely based on property size or features. Uplisting also lacks transparent pricing details, with no public quotes or fee structures available.

Given the absence of clear pricing, your best approach is to contact both vendors directly for tailored quotes, especially considering Counter’s flexible options.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

  • Hotels that operate hostels, budget accommodations, or boutique properties with multiple beds.
  • Teams that prioritize ease of use, quick onboarding, and reliable support.
  • Properties needing channel management, booking engines, and integrated POS.
  • Hotels looking for a mobile-friendly system for on-the-go management.

Not ideal if your property requires advanced revenue management or has complex group booking needs. Counter excels in operational simplicity for hostels and similar properties.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Uplisting?

  • Short-term rental operators managing multiple units across various locations.
  • Teams seeking automation in guest communications, calendar sync, and maintenance.
  • Properties aiming for a unified platform to boost efficiency and scalability.
  • Managers interested in AI insights into reviews and guest sentiment.

Not ideal if you need a proven, reviewed system with extensive integrations and regional support. Uplisting is best for rental businesses in growth mode, not yet with a strong global footprint.

Counter vs Uplisting: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Counter is a well-established PMS tailored for hostels, offering 19 distinct features and a high user satisfaction score. Its recent reviews and extensive integrations make it a dependable choice for properties seeking operational simplicity and support.

Uplisting presents a compelling vision for short-term rental management, but its lack of recent reviews, limited integrations, and global presence mean it’s less proven. For now, Counter is the safer, more reliable choice.

Choose Counter if your property benefits from a straightforward, feature-rich platform with proven support and a strong user community. Opt for Uplisting if you operate multiple units, value automation, and are willing to wait for more reviews before fully committing.

In conclusion, for property managers who prioritize stability, user satisfaction, and comprehensive features, Counter clearly stands out. Its recent, positive reviews and extensive partner network reinforce its position as the better choice for hostel and boutique hotel operators.

Counter 和 Uplisting 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Counter Counter Uplisting

Counter 有哪些 Uplisting 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Uplisting 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Counter Counter Uplisting
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
交付过程
日历视图
自定义费率
预订引擎
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。

Counter 对比 Uplisting:总结

Counter
Counter
4.6/5 来自 57 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

用户界面和可用性 83% 正面

酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。

客户支持 98% 正面

Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。

自动化功能 83% 正面

用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

错误问题 86% 负面

几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。

报告和收入管理 50% 负面

酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。

独特功能

频道管理员 交付过程 预订引擎 日历视图 自定义费率
4.6/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 7 个集成
查看资料
Uplisting
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 2 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
易用性 Counter 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Counter 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
性价比 Counter 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
入职培训 Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

关于 Counter 与 Uplisting 的常见问题

Counter 能否替代 Uplisting?

这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Uplisting 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Uplisting 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Counter 或 Uplisting 是否提供免费方案?

Counter:否。Uplisting:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Counter 和 Uplisting?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Uplisting 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息