The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
V12.Net |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
V12.Net |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
V12.Net |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and V12.Net by V12.Net hinges on your hotel’s operational focus and size. Counter is a specialized PMS built explicitly for hostels, offering a suite of features tailored for small to mid-sized hostels, especially in regions like Europe and North America. V12.Net, however, functions more as a broad property management platform suited to diverse property types, including larger hotels and real estate portfolios, but lacks recent user reviews or detailed feedback relevant to hospitality operations. Which platform aligns better with your current needs?
Counter has established itself as a trusted solution with more recent reviews, a higher overall rating, and a dedicated user base in the hostel segment. V12.Net’s lack of recent reviews and limited publicly available operational details make it a less proven choice for hoteliers seeking a reliable PMS.
Counter excels at providing a simple, intuitive interface, with a 4.73/5 overall rating from 54 reviews, and a 4.6/5 ease of use score. Users praise its straightforward setup, mobile compatibility, and automation features that cut down manual tasks. Conversely, V12.Net has no recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, indicating a lack of current user feedback or active support engagement.
Counter’s recent reviews highlight its effective channel management, POS integration, and automated night audit features, though some users report bugs affecting bed availability and overbooking. V12.Net’s absence of recent reviews makes it difficult to assess its current reliability or functionality. Are you comfortable choosing a product with active, detailed feedback, or do you prefer a platform with no recent data?
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or small guesthouse, Counter is clearly the better choice. It’s tailored for hostels, with 83% of its users in this segment, and offers features like booking engine, guest CRM, and multi-lingual support. Its high review count and recent positive feedback make it a dependable option, especially in regions like Europe and North America.
If your hotel is a larger property or a real estate-focused operation that requires comprehensive lease and maintenance management, V12.Net might seem appealing. However, due to the absence of recent reviews or detailed feature updates, Counter remains the more trustworthy option for hospitality-specific needs. Would you prefer a product tested and rated recently by your peers, or a platform with no recent user feedback?
Counter scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its clean, intuitive interface and quick staff onboarding. It’s mobile-friendly, allowing your team to manage check-ins, bookings, and reports remotely, with most users finding training straightforward.
V12.Net provides no recent reviews, so usability insights are unavailable. Given the active feedback on Counter’s user-friendly design, it’s clear that your team will adapt faster with Counter than with a platform lacking current usability data. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 distinct features, including a channel manager, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and ancillary revenue tracking—features critical for managing small hotel or hostel operations efficiently. It also provides a housekeeper module, direct billing, and group functionality, adding value for busy hostel environments.
V12.Net has no publicly available feature list or recent updates, making it impossible to compare directly. Given Counter’s extensive feature set and active development, it clearly leads in functional offerings. Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts a 4.96/5 support rating based on recent reviews, with users praising its responsiveness and professionalism, especially from team members like Evelyn and Max. Reviewers frequently mention quick replies and helpful assistance, although some note support can slow during off-hours.
V12.Net provides no recent customer support reviews, leaving its support quality uncertain. The current active feedback for Counter’s support makes it the safer choice for property managers who value reliable help. Edge: Counter.
Counter is integrated with seven verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki, plus payment processors like Stripe. These integrations enable your hotel to connect with multiple distribution channels, streamline payments, and enhance overall operational efficiency.
V12.Net lacks publicly available information on integrations or verified partner connections. Without such integrations, your hotel may face more manual work or limited connectivity. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s active user reviews give it a 4.73/5 overall score, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Its reviews are recent, with scores reflecting satisfaction across usability, support, and features, especially among hostel operators.
V12.Net has no recent reviews or ratings, so current user sentiment is unknown. The lack of recent feedback, combined with Counter’s high rating and active reviews, makes Counter the preferred choice for hoteliers. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not list specific pricing but is known for offering a freemium model or flexible plans suitable for small hostels, with no implementation or monthly fees explicitly mentioned. Its affordability is inferred from positive ROI scores and user feedback on value for money.
V12.Net’s pricing details are unavailable, and no recent pricing model has been publicly disclosed. Given Counter’s transparent and flexible approach, it’s the more accessible option for budget-conscious properties. Edge: Counter.
Counter is ideal for small to mid-sized properties looking for simplicity and automation.
V12.Net may suit complex property management needs but lacks recent hotel-specific feedback.
Counter is a dedicated PMS built for hostels and small hotels, with active reviews, a high rating, and a comprehensive feature set that addresses daily operational needs. Its recent feedback underscores its reliability, ease of use, and strong customer support, making it a practical choice for properties focused on guest experience and operational efficiency.
V12.Net, while potentially robust for large-scale property management, currently offers no recent reviews or detailed insights into its usability or functionality within the hospitality sector. Its lack of recent user engagement suggests it’s unproven in current hotel environments.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, well-rated PMS with active support and recent user validation, Counter is the clear choice. For larger, real estate, or multi-property operations with complex management requirements, further investigation into V12.Net’s capabilities and support might be necessary, but the lack of recent hotel-focused feedback is a concern.
In summary: For most hoteliers evaluating these options today, Counter’s recent reviews, high user ratings, and active feature development make it the safer, more reliable investment.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 V12.Net 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 V12.Net 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。V12.Net:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,V12.Net 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问