The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and VIPS PMS by VIPS hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational scale. Counter excels as a user-friendly, hostelry-focused PMS with a high rating backed by recent, detailed reviews, while VIPS offers a broader feature set and global presence but lacks user feedback data. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but their core strengths diverge significantly.
Counter addresses the critical needs of hostels and small properties with its simple interface and dedicated support. VIPS, on the other hand, caters to versatile hotel environments looking for extensive automation and integration options. Are you prioritizing ease of use and rapid support or feature depth and international reach?
Counter is highly regarded for its intuitive design, ease of onboarding, and specialization in hostel management, making it ideal for small to medium hostels seeking a straightforward solution. VIPS, with its extensive feature list and larger regional footprint, suits hotels needing a comprehensive, scalable platform capable of handling complex operations and multiple revenue streams.
Counter's standout appeal is its straightforward interface and mobile friendliness, rated 4.6/5 by users and supported by a network of 54 recent reviews with a solid 91% likelihood of recommendation. VIPS's global presence in Europe and its variety of advanced features remain unverified by recent user reviews, making it less proven in real-world hotel settings.
If your property is a hostel or small hotel that values simplicity, Counter is the better fit. For larger, multi-property operations seeking a wide array of features, VIPS might seem attractive but lacks recent user validation.
If your hotel primarily operates within the hostel segment or small boutique properties, Counter is the clear choice. Its ease of use, dedicated support, and proven track record with 54 recent reviews make it a reliable, cost-effective option. Conversely, if your hotel requires extensive automation, multi-channel management, and advanced revenue tools, VIPS's feature-rich platform—despite no recent reviews—would theoretically serve larger operations better.
Counter's low-cost, straightforward approach appeals to properties that prioritize guest management and operational simplicity. VIPS’s broader feature set, including integrations like online check-in, gift vouchers, and real-time reporting, targets hotels with complex needs and larger teams.
In summary, choose Counter for ease of operation and proven user satisfaction. Opt for VIPS if you need advanced features and a more comprehensive management suite, understanding it lacks recent user feedback validation.
Counter maintains a user rating of 4.6/5, with reviews highlighting an intuitive, clean interface that requires minimal training. Its onboarding process is rated 4.7/5, with users praising its mobile-friendly design for remote management. Support responsiveness is also highly rated at 4.96/5, with specific praise for team members like Evelyn and Max.
VIPS's user experience data is unavailable, but its extensive feature set suggests a steeper learning curve. Its platform is designed for versatility, which often translates to increased complexity for new users.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 17 common features plus two unique ones: a mobile app and multi-currency support, making it particularly suited for hostels and small properties. It integrates with platforms like Stripe and Goki, supporting automation and cashless payments.
VIPS boasts 28 exclusive features, including transaction emails, native email marketing, gift vouchers, centralized messaging, automated reminders, and digital registration. Its suite encompasses revenue management, real-time reporting, EPoS, and task management, catering to larger, multi-property hotels with complex operational needs.
Given the feature counts, VIPS provides a broader, more comprehensive feature set. However, Counter's focus on core hostel needs with essential integrations offers simplicity and specific functionality.
Edge: VIPS.
Counter’s support team is frequently praised for responsiveness and helpfulness, with a support score of 4.96/5. Users mention fast replies from team members like Evelyn and Max, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Some review comments note slower responses in certain time zones but overall rate support highly.
VIPS has no recent reviews or ratings available regarding customer support, making it impossible to gauge its service quality. Its larger enterprise profile suggests a structured support system, but this remains unverified by current user feedback.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, Goki, Cloudbeds, and Channex, facilitating essential functions like payments and channel management. It lacks some regional channel options but covers key integrations for small properties.
VIPS offers 11 verified integrations, including RoomPriceGenie, Omniboost, and RevControl. Its broader partner network suggests more flexibility in connecting various tools, especially for larger hotels needing extensive automation.
Given the current verified data, VIPS has a slight edge in integrations, but Counter’s partnerships focus on core operational needs.
Edge: VIPS.
Counter’s ratings are current and robust, with an overall score of 4.73/5 based on 54 recent reviews. Hoteliers particularly praise its ease of use, customer support, and value, especially in the hostel segment.
VIPS has no recent user ratings or reviews, making it impossible to determine current user sentiment or satisfaction levels. Its market presence is primarily in Europe, but without recent feedback, its user rating strength remains unverified.
Thus, Counter is clearly the higher-rated solution according to recent reviews.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not provide publicly available pricing details, suggesting a flexible model or custom quotes. It appears to operate without implementation fees or monthly flat rates, emphasizing affordability for small properties.
VIPS charges a base price of $800 monthly, with no mention of tiered pricing or discounts. Its cost structure indicates a significant investment, suitable for properties with larger operational budgets.
If budget is a concern, Counter’s lack of transparent pricing may be advantageous, while VIPS’s fixed fee reflects its enterprise-grade features.
Not ideal if your property needs complex revenue management, extensive automation, or multi-property management features.
Not ideal if your hotel values simplicity and quick onboarding over extensive feature sets.
Counter provides a streamlined, easy-to-use PMS tailored for hostels and small properties, with a proven track record and high recent user ratings. Its core focus on guest management, automation, and support makes it an excellent choice for properties prioritizing simplicity and reliability.
VIPS offers a broader array of features suitable for larger, more complex hotels, but the lack of recent user reviews limits confidence in its current performance. Its extensive automation and integration capabilities can serve bigger operations well but may be overly complex for smaller properties.
For properties valuing ease of use and proven satisfaction, Counter is the clear choice. If your hotel requires a feature-rich, scalable system and you’re prepared to invest in implementation, VIPS might be appealing—though caution is advised due to the absence of recent feedback.
Note: This comparison is based on the latest available reviews and feature data. Given Counter’s recent review volume and high ratings, it stands as the more reliable, tested solution for small to medium properties. VIPS’s broader feature set remains unverified by recent user experience, which should factor into your decision.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 VIPS PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 VIPS PMS 提供 11 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。VIPS PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,VIPS 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问