The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Visual Hotel by CMSol hinges on your hotel’s operational needs. Counter is a comprehensive PMS that excels in managing hostels with a suite of features, while CMSol offers AI-driven insights but lacks a dedicated review and feature depth. Which system better aligns with your property’s size, segment, and growth plans?
Counter is a more established, review-backed platform with a high user rating and recent support improvements. CMSol, despite its innovation, has not yet demonstrated its effectiveness through recent reviews. Are you prioritizing proven reliability or exploring new AI-driven solutions?
Counter is designed explicitly for hostels, boasting a suite of 19 exclusive features like channel management, booking engine, automated night audit, and guest CRM, making daily operations more straightforward. CMSol, on the other hand, offers no unique features listed and appears to focus on AI-driven insights rather than core property management functions.
Counter maintains a high overall rating of 4.73/5 based on 54 recent reviews, with a strong 91% likelihood to recommend, signaling broad satisfaction. CMSol’s reviews are nonexistent or outdated, making it difficult to assess its effectiveness or reliability.
Do you need a proven, full-featured PMS or are you exploring AI analytics with uncertain current support?
If your hotel primarily needs a reliable, easy-to-use PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, Counter is the clear choice. Its intuitive interface, 4.6/5 ease of use rating, and dedicated features like group booking management and integrated POS make it more suitable for day-to-day operations.
If your hotel aims to harness AI for guest feedback insights, operational recommendations, or personalized marketing and your team is comfortable with unproven platforms, CMSol’s AI capabilities may appeal. However, with no recent reviews or verified integrations, it’s risky to rely solely on this.
For hoteliers seeking stability, extensive integrations, and strong support, Counter is the safer, more proven pick.
Counter’s user interface scores a 4.6/5, praised for its simplicity, clarity, and quick staff onboarding. Multiple reviewers highlight how new staff learn the system within days, and the mobile-friendly design allows management from anywhere.
CMSol’s user experience ratings are unavailable, and there’s no mention of onboarding support or user feedback about ease of use. The lack of recent reviews and detailed user insights suggests it may not yet be as refined or widely adopted.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features such as a channel manager, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and cloud-based architecture. These features directly address operational needs across reservations, revenue management, and guest engagement.
CMSol does not list any specific features, focusing instead on AI review summaries and recommendations. The absence of core PMS features makes Counter the more comprehensive choice for property management.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with many reviews praising the responsiveness, especially from staff like Evelyn and Max. Users cite quick problem resolution and helpful assistance, though some note support could be slower during off-hours.
No recent reviews or ratings exist for CMSol’s customer support, leaving its responsiveness and quality uncertain. Given the importance of reliable support in PMS, Counter’s proven high rating makes it the clear leader.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, Goki, and Cloudbeds. These integrations support booking, payments, access control, and channel management, covering most operational touchpoints.
CMSol currently lists no verified integrations, which limits its connectivity options and flexibility. If seamless integration with third-party services is critical, Counter offers a clear advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s hotel users rate it at 4.73/5, with recent reviews emphasizing ease of use, support responsiveness, and feature completeness. Its user base mainly comprises hostels (83%), with consistent positive feedback about operational efficiency.
CMSol has no recent reviews or publicly available ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or property segment fit. Without verified feedback, Counter’s trusted reputation remains unmatched.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly listed but involve a flat monthly fee without implementation costs or freemium options, suggesting a predictable investment. CMSol provides no specific pricing information either, leaving potential buyers uncertain about costs.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your decision should consider the value provided by Counter’s extensive features and support, which are backed by recent reviews.
Not ideal if you require highly specialized revenue management or advanced AI analytics, as Counter focuses more on core operations.
Not ideal if you need a proven, feature-rich PMS with extensive integrations and recent user reviews.
Counter is a well-established PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, with a high review score, extensive features, and proven support. Its robust integration options and ease of use make it reliable for daily operations and growth.
CMSol, despite offering innovative AI capabilities, lacks recent reviews, verified integrations, and transparent pricing, making it a less dependable choice for now. If your hotel values stability, proven performance, and comprehensive property management, Counter is the better option.
Choose Counter if you prioritize reliability, extensive features, and proven support. Consider CMSol only if you’re exploring AI-driven insights and are prepared to navigate potential uncertainties in support and integration.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Visual Hotel 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Visual Hotel 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Visual Hotel:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,CMSol 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问