The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
WavePM |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #61 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
WavePM |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #66 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
WavePM |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #61 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) tailored for your hotel depends on your operational needs, guest volume, and regional focus. Counter by Counter is a dedicated PMS built for hostels, with a focus on simplicity and operational efficiency, while WavePM by WavePM is a broader property management platform emphasizing AI-driven insights and tenant management but currently has a very limited hotel-specific presence. Both aim to streamline operations but differ fundamentally in target audience, feature depth, and maturity.
Counter’s strong reputation stems from its intuitive interface and extensive reviews from hostel operators, whereas WavePM’s reviews are sparse, and its primary strength lies in its AI capabilities for property management. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s size, segment, and growth plans?
Counter, with its 54 reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating, is clearly favored by hoteliers, especially in the hostel segment. Its recent reviews reinforce its reputation for ease of use and reliable support, which are crucial for small to medium-sized hostels and boutique hotels.
WavePM, with only one review and a 0/5 rating, offers limited direct feedback from hoteliers, mostly praising its architecture and flexibility. Its focus appears more aligned with property managers handling multi-unit residential or motel segments, not traditional hotels. Given the lack of recent hotel-oriented reviews for WavePM, Counter is evidently more trusted in the hotel space.
If your hotel primarily operates in the hostel or budget hotel segment, Counter is the better fit due to its dedicated features, proven track record, and extensive user base of hostels. Its 19 exclusive features—like channel management, booking engine, guest CRM, and online support—are designed explicitly for small-scale and hostel-type accommodations.
Conversely, if your hotel is a larger property with complex needs, such as multi-property management or tenant engagement, WavePM might appeal with its AI-driven insights and expense management tools. But with only one review and no hotel-specific features or integrations documented, Counter remains the safer, more tested choice for hotels.
Counter earns a 4.6/5 in ease of use, with users highlighting its clean, simple interface and quick onboarding, rated at 4.7/5. Its mobile-friendly design allows staff to manage operations remotely, and reviews praise how quickly new staff adapt to its straightforward workflows.
WavePM claims a perfect 5/5 ease of use rating, emphasizing its modern architecture and AI features, but this is based on limited review data, not hotel-specific feedback. The single review available mentions flexibility and a user-friendly interface but lacks detailed usability insights.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 exclusive features tailored for hostel operations, including a comprehensive channel manager, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-lingual/multi-currency support, and ancillary revenue tracking. It also integrates with multiple third-party platforms like Stripe and Goki, adding to its versatility.
WavePM’s feature set appears more generalized, with no documented exclusive integrations or hotel-specific modules. Its AI capabilities for review summarization and recommendations are promising but currently lack hotel-specific features like a booking engine or channel management.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support is frequently praised, with a 4.96/5 rating based on 54 recent reviews, and reviewers mention quick, helpful responses from team members like Evelyn and Max. Many reviews emphasize that support is accessible and effective, especially for onboarding and troubleshooting.
WavePM’s support ratings are slightly lower at 4/5, with fewer reviews available. The limited feedback indicates a generally positive experience, but the lack of recent or extensive reviews weakens its support reputation.
Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 7 verified integration partners, including major OTA channel managers like SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki, along with Stripe for payments. These integrations facilitate seamless operations across booking channels, payments, and access control.
WavePM has zero verified integrations listed, which significantly limits its ability to connect with essential tools used in hotel operations today. For a hotel seeking a connected ecosystem, Counter’s integration network is clearly superior.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s 54 reviews and recent positive feedback reflect a 4.73/5 score, especially among hostel and boutique hotel operators. Its clients highlight a user-friendly experience, quick support, and operational efficiency, making it the preferred choice for small to mid-sized properties.
WavePM has only one review, which is highly positive about architecture and flexibility but does not provide hotel-specific ratings or detailed feedback. Without sufficient hotel-oriented reviews, Counter’s user ratings are more indicative of its value.
Edge: Counter.
Pricing details for Counter are not publicly disclosed but are based on a flat, no-implementation or monthly fee structure, with no reported trial or freemium options. Its focus on affordability and tailored features makes it accessible for small properties.
WavePM’s pricing model is also not specified, though it appears to be a paid platform with no free trial, but details remain unclear. Given the lack of transparent pricing and limited hotel-specific features, Counter’s value proposition is clearer and better documented.
Counter by Counter is a dedicated, feature-rich PMS designed for small and hostel properties, with a proven track record, extensive reviews, and regional presence in 29 countries. Its suite of integrations, ease of use, and support make it a reliable choice for hoteliers looking to streamline operations without complexity.
WavePM, while promising with its AI architecture and expense management tools, lacks hotel-specific features and proven user feedback in this space. Its current market presence and review data do not support its suitability for traditional hotels.
If your priority is a trusted, well-reviewed system tailored for hostel and small hotel operations, Counter is the clear choice. Reserve WavePM for larger, multi-unit residential or tenant-focused management where AI insights and flexible architecture are more critical than hotel-specific tools.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 WavePM 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 WavePM 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。WavePM 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。WavePM:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,WavePM 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问