The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 webhotelier | primalres group 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | #53 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #81 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | #72 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #47 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and PMS hotelizer by Webhotelier | Primalres Group boils down to your hotel’s specific needs. Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations, but Counter excels in serving hostels with its simplicity and robust features, whereas hotelizer caters to a broader hotel segment with extensive analytics and automation. Are you prioritizing ease of use and dedicated hostel management, or do you need a more comprehensive system for a diverse property portfolio?
Counter offers a straightforward, user-friendly interface tailored for small to mid-sized hostels, especially those with limited technical staff. Conversely, hotelizer provides a more complex set of tools suited to larger hotels with busy operations requiring detailed reporting and automation. Which system aligns best with your hotel's operational demands?
Counter has amassed a significantly larger number of recent reviews—54 in the last six months—and holds a higher overall rating of 4.73/5. Its high customer support score of 4.96/5 and ease of use rating of 4.6/5 reinforce its reputation among hostel operators. In contrast, hotelizer has no recent reviews or overall rating, making Counter the more trustworthy and tested option for your hotel.
Since recent reviews are your best indicator of a product’s current quality, Counter’s active user base and ongoing support make it the stronger choice today. Do you want your hotel management system backed by a vibrant, feedback-driven community? Then Counter is the preferred option.
Counter is designed primarily for hostels but is also suitable for boutique and small city-center hotels, especially those with a focus on simplicity and automation. Its features include channel management, booking engine, POS integration, and guest CRM, all tailored for small-scale operations.
Hotelizer, on the other hand, claims to serve a broader hotel market, with features like AI-powered reviews, detailed analytics, and extensive automation, aiming at larger properties with complex needs. However, without recent user reviews, it’s difficult to confirm its real-world effectiveness for these segments.
Counter's focus on hostels with a streamlined, mobile-friendly interface makes it ideal for small teams that value ease and speed. Hotelizer’s broad feature set might appeal to larger hotels with dedicated staff for data analysis and automation, but the lack of recent reviews raises questions about its current performance.
Would your team benefit from a simple, reliable system or a more intricate one for a bigger operation? Counter’s current review activity suggests it’s better suited for the former.
Choose Counter if your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-learn system that facilitates daily operations—especially for hostels or small properties. Its features include channel management, online booking, integrated payments, and guest CRM, all with an intuitive interface rated 4.6/5 by users.
Opt for hotelizer if you operate a larger hotel that requires extensive reporting, AI-driven insights, and automation tools to manage reservations and guest services. Its broader suite of features and analytics are designed for properties with complex operational demands.
If your hotel prioritizes quick onboarding, strong support, and a simple interface, Counter is the better pick. Conversely, if your operations demand a detailed analytics dashboard and automation, hotelizer might be more suitable—though its current reviews are unavailable.
Counter’s UI is consistently praised for its simplicity, with a 4.6/5 ease of use rating. Users highlight its intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and mobile compatibility, making staff training quick and straightforward. Customers also note that the system is straightforward enough for non-technical staff to navigate confidently.
Hotelizer’s interface is described as comprehensive but potentially more complex, suitable for larger teams comfortable with data-heavy platforms. However, no current reviews make it difficult to gauge its ease of use in practice.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features including channel management, online booking engine, POS system, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features are tailored for small to medium-hostel operations, emphasizing automation and mobility.
Hotelizer’s unspecified features likely include AI-powered analytics and extensive automation, but the lack of detailed recent data means we can’t confirm feature parity or uniqueness. Counter clearly leads with tangible, well-reviewed features that directly impact daily operations.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support scores are outstanding at 4.96/5, with many reviews praising its responsiveness and helpful staff—particularly Evelyn and Max. Reviewers appreciate the quick resolution of issues and the team’s receptiveness to feedback.
There are no recent reviews for hotelizer, making it impossible to evaluate its support quality. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel management, Counter’s proven responsiveness makes it the safer choice.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, and Goki, focusing on payment processing and channel management. Its integrations are tailored for hostel-specific needs, streamlining payments and access management.
Hotelizer boasts 15 verified integrations, including major PMS and booking platforms like Mews, Duetto, and TripAdvisor, suggesting broader connectivity. Yet, without recent user feedback, the effectiveness of these integrations remains unverified.
Edge: Hotelizer.
Counter’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 54 reviews, and a likelihood to recommend of 91%. Hoteliers particularly praise its ease of use, support, and features tailored for hostels, with some calling it the “best option for hostels.”
Hotelizer has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to compare user satisfaction accurately. The active review activity for Counter indicates it is the more trusted and appreciated system among hoteliers today.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly disclose pricing, but it is known to operate on a subscription basis with no implementation or trial fees, suggesting a straightforward pricing model. Hotelizer similarly offers no clear pricing details, hinting at custom quotes based on property needs.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your best approach is to contact sales for both, but Counter’s active user base suggests it might be more accessible for small to mid-sized properties.
Not ideal if your property requires extensive analytics, complex revenue management, or large-scale automation.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, needs simple management, or prefers a system with recent user reviews.
Counter is a streamlined, hostelry-focused PMS with a proven track record. Its intuitive interface, critical features, and high customer support scores make it ideal for small to medium hostels and boutique hotels.
Hotelizer offers a broader set of features geared toward larger, more complex hotels, but the absence of recent reviews makes its current performance uncertain. If your hotel values active support, ease of use, and a strong user base, Counter is the clear choice.
Choose Counter if you want a dependable, easy-to-manage PMS with recent, positive reviews. Hotelizer might suit larger, data-driven properties seeking extensive automation—yet its current lack of recent feedback makes Counter the safer, more proven option today.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 PMS hotelizer 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 PMS hotelizer 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 PMS hotelizer 提供 15 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。PMS hotelizer:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,webhotelier | primalres group 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问