The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 68 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 用户界面和可用性 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Cloud based.
WINSAR GROUP 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
基于 HTR 上 68 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 11 |
在分析了 68 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 WINSAR GROUP 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #51 3 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | #58 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | #29 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #50 4 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | #50 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | #47 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #48 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 4 条评价 | #14 5 条评价 |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | #19 1 条评价 |
Your hotel’s success depends on choosing a property management system (PMS) that simplifies operations, enhances guest experiences, and fits your budget. Both Counter by Counter and WINCLOUD by WINSAR GROUP aim to fulfill these needs, but they diverge significantly in features, user reviews, and market presence. Counter’s more recent reviews and higher overall ratings suggest it’s currently the more trusted choice. Which PMS aligns better with your property’s specific needs?
Counter by Counter and WINCLOUD by WINSAR GROUP are both designed to streamline hotel management but serve different segments and operational priorities. Counter is a free, mobile-friendly PMS tailored specifically for hostels, offering an intuitive interface that simplifies daily tasks like check-ins, reservations, and basic reporting. WINSAR GROUP’s WINCLOUD, in contrast, supplies a more comprehensive platform suitable for a range of hotel types, including resorts and multi-property chains, with over 35 unique features, including banquet management and advanced revenue tools.
Counter’s strengths lie in its simplicity, ease of onboarding, and targeted hostel features, making it ideal for small, independent hostels or boutique properties that prioritize basic operational workflows. WINCLOUD’s extensive capabilities and robust backend modules cater to larger hotels or chains seeking advanced automation, detailed reports, and integrated event management. Do you need a straightforward system to manage hostels or a multi-functional platform for larger operations?
If your hotel is a hostel or small property with limited staff who need a fast, easy-to-use system, go with Counter. Its free pricing model, high user ratings (4.73/5), and simple interface are ideal for properties that want to minimize training and operational complexity. Conversely, if your property is a resort, multi-property chain, or hotel with complex needs—such as banquet management, detailed revenue reports, or multi-channel distribution—WINSAR GROUP’s WINCLOUD, at $400/month, offers a wider range of features and integrations.
Counter suits properties that value mobility, straightforward workflows, and quick onboarding, especially in regions like Europe, North America, and Asia Pacific. WINCLOUD is better for hotels seeking advanced automation and integration, supporting operations across diverse locations with over 35 exclusive features. Which operational priorities align with your property’s growth plans?
Counter’s interface scores 4.6/5 and is praised for its simplicity, intuitive design, and mobile-friendly layout, making it easy for staff to learn and for managers to handle tasks remotely. Customer reviews highlight its quick onboarding process (4.7/5) and responsive support, with users describing it as ideal for hostel staff with minimal tech experience.
WINSAR GROUP’s WINCLOUD scores slightly higher for ease of use at 4.73/5 and offers a straightforward setup, with many users emphasizing its simplicity despite the platform’s extensive features. Support appears responsive and effective, especially from staff like Ms. Shane and Ms. Eliz, who assist with onboarding and troubleshooting.
Edge: WINSAR GROUP.
WINSAR GROUP offers a significantly larger feature set, with 35 unique functionalities, including automated space optimization, guest communication via SMS, online check-in, integrated ID scanners, revenue management, and GDPR compliance. In contrast, Counter provides only one exclusive feature—cloud-based operation—but covers essential hostel management needs like reservations, POS integration, and basic reporting.
Counter’s limited features might suit properties that don’t require extensive automation, but for hotels seeking advanced capabilities like automated reminders, task management, and integrated payment terminals, WINSAR GROUP is the clear leader.
Edge: WINSAR GROUP.
Counter’s support team receives high praise, with a 4.96/5 rating and comments highlighting its responsiveness, particularly from staff members Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate quick responses and helpful assistance, although some mention support can be slower in different time zones.
WINSAR GROUP’s support scores just below at 4.91/5. with positive reviews about patient, clear, and ongoing support from staff like Ms. Shane and Ms. Eliz. Both platforms are highly rated, but Counter’s recent reviews and higher overall rating indicate slightly better support quality.
Edge: Counter.
Counter has proven integrations with seven verified partners, including popular channels and tools like Stripe, Cloudbeds, and SiteMinder, which help streamline bookings, payments, and access control. WINSAR GROUP currently lacks verified integrations, which limits its connectivity options.
For properties relying on multiple distribution channels or needing seamless payment solutions, Counter’s integrations are a significant advantage. WINSAR GROUP’s focus remains on core hotel operations without extensive third-party connections.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s high review count (54 reviews, with no recent negative trends) and a 91% likelihood to recommend showcase strong user confidence. Hotels in various segments, especially hostels, rate it an average of 4.75/5, citing its ease of use and support.
WINSAR GROUP has only 11 reviews, with a slightly higher recommendation rate of 95%, but reviews are older and less detailed. Given the recent surge in Counter’s reviews and its high rating, it’s the more trusted platform among hoteliers.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not list a fixed price and appears to be a free platform, targeting small properties like hostels. There are no implementation fees or subscription charges, making it accessible for budget-conscious operations.
WINSAR GROUP charges $400 per month with no mention of setup fees or trial periods. Its pricing aligns with its extensive feature set, suitable for properties with larger operational budgets.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter by Counter is a straightforward, highly-rated PMS ideal for hostels and small hotels that prioritize simplicity and mobility. Its free model, ease of onboarding, and recent reviews make it a compelling choice for properties with limited operational complexity.
WINSAR GROUP’s WINCLOUD offers a broader feature set, including automation, revenue management, and event planning, making it suitable for larger properties or chains seeking a scalable, all-in-one management platform. Its higher price point reflects its extensive capabilities.
In conclusion, choose Counter if your focus is on basic operations, quick setup, and budget-friendly management. Opt for WINSAR GROUP if you need a comprehensive system that can handle complex, multi-property operations with automation and detailed reporting.
Final recommendation: For most small to medium-sized hotels or hostels, Counter’s recent reviews, higher overall rating, and ease of use make it the more trustworthy choice. Larger properties or those with advanced needs should consider WINSAR GROUP’s robust feature set, despite the higher price and limited integrations.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 WINCLOUD 共享 18 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 24 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 WINCLOUD 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 WINCLOUD 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。WINCLOUD 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。WINCLOUD:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,WINSAR GROUP 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问