The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Winner Hotel Software 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Winner Hotel Software 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is vital for your hotel's operational success. Both Counter and Winner PMS aim to streamline bookings, guest management, and daily operations, but they diverge significantly in reputation, features, and user experience. Counter, with over 54 recent reviews and a high overall rating, is clearly the more established and trusted solution. Are you prepared to prioritize recent feedback and proven performance?
Counter by Counter is the clear choice for hoteliers who value a well-rated, feature-rich PMS with extensive regional presence, especially in the hostel segment. Winner PMS (acquired by Mews), despite its strong reputation in the industry, lacks recent reviews and a broad regional footprint, making it less reliable for now. For your hotel, prioritizing current performance and user satisfaction points toward Counter.
Counter and Winner PMS serve the same core purpose—simplifying hotel operations—but their market presence and review data differ greatly. Counter, founded in 2019 and based in Germany, has accumulated 54 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.73/5 overall rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend. Conversely, Winner PMS, with no recent reviews, has a less transparent recent performance record, and its global footprint is more limited.
Counter’s reviews highlight its ease of use, excellent support, and a broad feature set tailored for hostels and small hotels. Some users mention bugs, especially with bed availability and overbooking, but ongoing improvements and responsive support mitigate these issues. Winner PMS, on the other hand, has a strong industry reputation but lacks recent user feedback to validate current performance. Are you willing to rely on a product with no recent validation?
If your hotel operates primarily within the hostel segment or needs an intuitive, mobile-friendly PMS, Counter is the better choice. Its high user ratings, comprehensive features—including channel management, online booking, payments, and guest CRM—and active regional presence make it suitable for properties seeking simplicity and reliability.
If your hotel demands a more established system with a potentially broader integration ecosystem and you’re comfortable with less recent feedback, Winner PMS may suit you. However, given the lack of recent reviews and limited regional reach, Counter’s proven track record offers more certainty for your operational needs today.
Counter boasts a 4.6/5 ease of use rating, with users praising its intuitive, clean interface and quick onboarding process. Its mobile-friendly design allows staff to manage reservations on the go, and support from Evelyn and Max is frequently highlighted as prompt and helpful.
Winner PMS’s usability is not clearly reflected in recent reviews, but industry reputation suggests an emphasis on user-centered design. However, the absence of recent user feedback makes it difficult to assess current ease of use. Based on available data, Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, housekeeping module, automated night audit, and guest CRM—all tailored for hostel and small hotel needs. It also supports multi-currency, multi-lingual interfaces, and ancillary revenue tracking, providing a holistic operational toolkit.
Winner PMS’s feature set is not detailed in recent reviews, but industry standing indicates it offers reservation, billing, housekeeping, and other essential functions. Without specific feature comparisons, Counter’s broader, more detailed feature list gives it the edge in versatility and specialization, especially for smaller properties.
Counter’s support team scores a 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting rapid, helpful responses from team members like Evelyn and Max. Many hoteliers appreciate their professionalism, though some note support may be slower during off-hours.
Winner PMS’s customer support reputation is solid but not recent enough to compare directly. Its industry reputation suggests reliability, but the lack of current reviews limits confidence. Based on recent feedback, Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including prominent platforms like Cloudbeds, Stripe, and SiteMinder. Its extensive partner network supports multiple channels and payment options, allowing for more flexible integrations.
Winner PMS has only one verified integration—Mews—limiting its connectivity options. For properties seeking a versatile, multi-channel operation environment, Counter’s broader integration landscape gives it a clear advantage. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews (54 in the last six months) are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.73/5 overall rating and 91% likelihood to recommend. Its primary users—hostels—rate it particularly highly (average 4.75/5), citing ease of use and support.
Winner PMS lacks recent reviews, making it difficult to gauge current hoteliers’ satisfaction. Historically, it has been well-regarded in the industry, but without fresh data, Counter’s recent high ratings and volume of feedback make it the more reliable choice today. Edge: Counter.
Both products do not publicly list detailed pricing structures, indicating custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. Counter’s model is not freemium or flat-rate; similarly, Winner PMS offers no transparent pricing.
Budget considerations should involve direct vendor contact for quotes. However, Counter’s active feature set and recent reviews point to a solution that offers good value, especially for small to mid-sized properties.
Counter offers a feature-rich, user-friendly PMS with high recent satisfaction and extensive integrations, making it ideal for smaller hotels and hostels. Its recent review volume and high ratings provide confidence in its current capabilities.
Winner PMS, despite its industry reputation, suffers from a lack of recent reviews and limited regional coverage. Its focus on larger-scale hotel operations may appeal to properties with complex needs, but the absence of current feedback diminishes its reliability for now.
For your hotel, especially if you prioritize recent user experiences and active regional presence, Counter is the safer, more proven option. It combines a broad feature set with excellent support, making it the recommended choice today.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Winner PMS (acquired by Mews):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Winner Hotel Software 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问