项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 88 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive/HCN 在上手体验方面表现出色,尤其适合品牌连锁住宿设施(4.8/5),并拥有信用卡付款以及支付集成等独家功能。
Criton 凭借手机值机以及客人资料等独家功能脱颖而出。
基于 HTR 上 88 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $400/月 | 联系销售 |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 21 |
在分析了 88 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive/HCN 用户最看重其 响应式支持, 与客人系统的集成, 单一无缝客人门户,而 Criton 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应式支持
▾
|
|
|
+
与客人系统的集成
▾
|
|
|
+
单一无缝客人门户
▾
|
|
|
+
可定制的宾客体验
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
响应时间和时区延迟
▾
|
|
|
−
运输与交付物流
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 14 条评价 | #5 14 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #8 24 条评价 | #18 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 15 条评价 | #18 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #6 7 条评价 | #27 0 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 27 条评价 | #15 7 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #7 31 条评价 | #13 10 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | #16 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #16 2 条评价 | #9 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 26 条评价 | #10 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | #12 18 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #11 2 条评价 | #19 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #11 1 条评价 | — |
Crave Interactive/HCN and Criton both serve the hotel guest engagement category through mobile platforms that enhance service delivery and guest experience. They diverge primarily in their operational focus and feature sets. Crave Interactive/HCN is stronger in food and beverage ordering with contactless payment options and POS integrations, suitable for properties emphasizing in-venue dining and ancillary revenue. Criton centers on a branded guest app experience with mobile check-in and digital key capabilities, fitting hotels prioritizing a comprehensive digital journey including room access.
Both platforms address the hotel need for contactless guest interactions and increased ancillary revenue. Crave’s system supports ordering from anywhere on property, while Criton enables branded apps with mobile check-in and messaging. The choice depends on whether a hotel prioritizes food and beverage ordering automation or a broader guest journey app with integrated check-in.
If you operate a medium to large hotel or resort in North America or Europe with a strong food and beverage component, choose Crave Interactive/HCN. Its 18 unique features, including QR code ordering, Apple Pay, Google Pay, POS integration, and tipping, support operational workflows for front desk, F&B, and event teams. Crave’s 67 reviews averaging 4.6/5, with strong ratings in branded (4.8/5) and boutique hotels (4.7/5), confirm suitability for these segments.
If you run an independent boutique or serviced apartment property seeking a branded guest app with mobile check-in and digital door keys, especially in Europe or the Middle East, Criton fits better. Its unique features include guest profiles, app download, and mobile check-in, which support front desk and guest services workflows. Criton’s 21 reviews average 4.6/5, with boutique hotels rating it 4.9/5 and extended stay at 4.9/5, indicating strength in these segments.
Data is limited for smaller inns and hostels; Crave has some presence there but few reviews. Neither product has recent reviews in the last six months, so current product changes are not reflected.
Crave Interactive/HCN scores slightly higher in ease of use (4.6/5) and onboarding (4.7/5) compared to Criton’s 4.5/5 and 4.4/5 respectively, based on 67 vs. 21 reviews. Reviewers praise Crave’s intuitive interface for guests and staff, enabling quick order processing and straightforward menu updates, though some call for a more modern back-end system. Criton users find the app user friendly for guests and content managers but mention that customization options are limited and feature rollout is slower, impacting staff adoption.
Crave customers highlight responsiveness and simplicity working with the support team and ease of use for hotel staff. Criton users appreciate the content management system’s flexibility in updating app content but note teething issues and slower feature development.
Edge: Crave Interactive/HCN.
Crave Interactive/HCN has 18 unique features not offered by Criton, including web-based (appless) access, automatic multilingual translation, QR codes, Apple Pay, Google Pay, POS integration, contactless ordering, tipping, and scheduling. These features automate ordering and payment workflows, reduce front desk manual work, and increase ancillary revenue. For example, QR codes enable guests to order at poolside or venues without app downloads, speeding guest service and increasing tips.
Criton offers only three unique features: mobile check-in, guest profiles, and app download. Mobile check-in and digital key functions enable front desk teams to reduce physical contact and streamline arrivals, which Crave lacks. Criton’s branded app allows full control over guest experience and messaging, supporting marketing and direct booking efforts.
Both share seven features like in-room messaging and ordering, but Crave’s deeper food service and payment integrations provide more operational impact for hotels with significant F&B. Criton’s mobile check-in and guest profile capabilities better support contactless front desk workflows.
Edge: Crave Interactive/HCN.
Crave Interactive/HCN leads in customer support ratings at 4.8/5 and onboarding at 4.7/5 compared to Criton’s 4.6/5 and 4.4/5, based on 67 and 21 reviews. Reviewers commend Crave’s extremely fast response times, with one noting a price change completed within two minutes even at 2 a.m. Multiple users highlight proactive and helpful support, which reduces downtime and accelerates issue resolution.
Criton users also report quick support and an approachable team but mention slower development cycles that delay feature availability. Some reviews cite teething issues resolved over time, suggesting ongoing product maturation.
Edge: Crave Interactive/HCN.
Crave Interactive/HCN has 17 verified integrations, slightly ahead of Criton’s 15. Both platforms integrate with Oracle Hospitality, supporting common PMS workflows. Crave uniquely integrates with INTEREL, PressReader, Book4Time, Quore, Kipsu, Infor, InfoGenesis, Amadeus, and Actabl, enhancing F&B ordering, spa, and guest services operations. Criton’s unique integrations include Net Affinity / Smarthotel, Nonius, Benbria, SHR Group, GuestRevu, RMS, Mews, Maestro PMS, Access Hospitality, and Vingcard, supporting mobile check-in, messaging, and digital keys.
Hotels needing broad F&B and spa integration benefit from Crave’s ecosystem. Those prioritizing mobile check-in and keyless access will find Criton’s integrations more relevant.
Edge: Even.
Both products have an overall rating of 4.6/5. Crave’s rating is based on 67 reviews, while Criton’s 21 reviews reflect a smaller sample size. Neither product has recent reviews in the last six months, so ratings may not reflect the current state precisely. Crave’s 93% likelihood to recommend slightly edges Criton’s 92%.
By segment, Crave scores highest in branded hotels (4.8/5, 27 reviews) and casinos (4.8/5, 8 reviews), while Criton leads boutique hotels (4.9/5, 7 reviews) and extended stay (4.9/5, 4 reviews). Criton’s boutique and extended stay ratings suggest it fits independent and serviced apartment properties well. Crave shows strength in luxury and branded properties with more reviews supporting those ratings.
Edge: Even.
Crave Interactive/HCN publishes a base price of $400.00 but does not offer freemium, monthly flat, or per-room pricing, nor implementation fees or trials. Criton does not publish pricing details publicly, limiting direct cost comparison. Neither product offers a free trial.
Hotels should contact vendors directly for precise pricing based on property size and feature requirements.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Crave Interactive/HCN and Criton both provide digital guest engagement tools but serve different operational priorities. Crave focuses on contactless food and beverage ordering with extensive payment options and POS integrations, ideal for hotels with significant F&B operations. Criton emphasizes a branded guest app experience with mobile check-in and digital keys, suitable for boutique and serviced apartment properties seeking comprehensive digital guest journeys.
Choose Crave Interactive/HCN if your property requires advanced food service automation, multi-language support, and rapid customer support, backed by 67 verified reviews and 18 unique features enhancing operational workflows. Opt for Criton if your hotel values mobile check-in, guest profiles, and a branded app with flexible content management, supported by strong boutique and extended stay hotel ratings, despite fewer features related to ordering and payments.
The decision hinges on your hotel’s primary operational focus: food and beverage service efficiency with Crave or digital guest journey and contactless check-in with Criton.
酒店客人应用 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $400/月 | — |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Communication & Messaging
|
|
|
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 请求管理 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
|
▾
Content Management
|
|
|
| 酒店目录 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 当地推荐 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
|
▾
Upselling
|
|
|
| 付款 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
|
▾
Request Management
|
|
|
| 请求管理 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 移动结帐 | ||
| 手机值机 |
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持被描述为有帮助且专业,团队协助用户使用设备并排查系统问题。评论者认为这是一个优势,因为快速且实用的支持有助于减少服务中断,保障宾客体验。
评论者强调Crave与关键的面向客人的系统集成良好,这有助于将服务集中到一个数字接触点。这样的集成对于减少摩擦并使酒店的服务感觉统一而非分散非常重要。
提到的一个主要优势是客人可以通过一个单一且易于导航的网站或应用访问所有产品和服务。这通过减少混淆并使客人更容易发现和使用酒店设施,从而支持更顺畅的客人... 提到的一个主要优势是客人可以通过一个单一且易于导航的网站或应用访问所有产品和服务。这通过减少混淆并使客人更容易发现和使用酒店设施,从而支持更顺畅的客人体验。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
尽管支持总体上是积极的,但有一条评论提到偶尔会有几小时的延迟,因为Crave的团队位于欧洲,而酒店位于北美。该延迟不被视为严重,但对于需要跨时区即时解决问... 尽管支持总体上是积极的,但有一条评论提到偶尔会有几小时的延迟,因为Crave的团队位于欧洲,而酒店位于北美。该延迟不被视为严重,但对于需要跨时区即时解决问题的酒店来说,这可能会产生影响。
一位评论者指出需要更好的物流和更快的新设备交付,表明实施和更换的时间安排可能成为运营中的痛点。对于酒店来说,较慢的交付可能会延迟面向客人的技术推广、更... 一位评论者指出需要更好的物流和更快的新设备交付,表明实施和更换的时间安排可能成为运营中的痛点。对于酒店来说,较慢的交付可能会延迟面向客人的技术推广、更新或扩展。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform (acq by HCN) 和 Criton 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform (acq by HCN) 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Criton 提供 15 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Crave Mobile Platform (acq by HCN) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform (acq by HCN):否。Criton:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive/HCN 的 HT Score 为 77,Criton 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐