The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 232 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 客户服务 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Credit Card Payments and Payments Integrations.
Guestnet 表现出色 在 user-friendly interface 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Profiles and Mobile Checkin.
基于 HTR 上 232 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 165 |
在分析了 232 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 Guestnet 用户则强调 user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, 积极的宾客体验。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
+
积极的宾客体验
▾
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
−
与外部系统的集成
▾
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
−
推送通知和提醒
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | #2 56 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | #2 85 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | #17 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | #3 52 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | #3 66 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | #7 18 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 2 条评价 | #3 14 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | #13 3 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | #2 158 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #8 2 条评价 | #16 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Crave Mobile Platform and Guestnet hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both products aim to enhance guest engagement, streamline communication, and improve service delivery, but they approach these goals differently. Crave offers a primarily app-based, service-oriented platform with extensive feature options, while Guestnet emphasizes a fully customizable web-app with strong integrations. How do these differences align with your hotel’s goals?
Crave’s platform is well-suited for hotels that want a dedicated, app-based solution for mobile ordering, guest interaction, and service automation, especially if they value detailed analytics and a broad feature set. Guestnet, on the other hand, is better if seamless integration, flexible content management, and a no-installation experience are priorities. Which approach best fits your operational model?
Both platforms seek to elevate guest experiences but focus on different strengths. Crave provides a mobile app that guests access via QR codes and offers multiple contactless payment options, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing direct service automation and in-venue ordering. Guestnet excels with its web-based approach, allowing guests to engage without downloading an app, which can improve adoption rates and simplify updates.
Crave’s heavy feature set, including NFC, contactless payments, and in-venue ordering, makes it a strong choice for hotels seeking advanced service automation. Guestnet’s strengths lie in its full customization, strong PMS integrations, and ability to operate across multiple channels—web, print, TV, without requiring app downloads. Do you prefer a dedicated app experience or a flexible, browser-based solution?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, app-based guest engagement platform with advanced ordering and payment features, Crave is the clear winner. Its 16 unique features—like NFC, QR codes, and multi-menu ordering—are ideal for properties aiming to maximize on-site service automation and guest interaction.
If your hotel prioritizes seamless integration with existing systems, a fully customizable interface, and no app download barrier, Guestnet is the better fit. With more recent reviews and 152 total, its user-friendly web-app supports personalized content, real-time updates, and powerful PMS integrations—making it suitable for upscale and independent hotels.
Edge: Guestnet.
Crave’s interface is praised for its simplicity—reviewers highlight that it is “super customizable” yet very intuitive, with a user rating of 4.61/5. The onboarding process is well-rated at 4.57/5, and support is considered prompt and helpful, but some found menu creation a bit complex.
Guestnet’s platform scores slightly higher for ease of use, at 4.74/5, with reviewers emphasizing its intuitive design and straightforward setup. Support and onboarding are also rated highly (4.82/5 and 4.66/5 respectively), and users appreciate how quickly staff and guests adapt to the web-based interface.
Edge: Guestnet.
Crave offers 16 features exclusive to its platform, including Apple Pay, Google Pay, in-venue ordering, contactless ordering, POS, and NFC. These advanced features facilitate a highly automated, contactless guest experience and are particularly useful during health-conscious moments or for luxury services.
Guestnet provides 3 unique features—guest profiles, mobile check-in, and app download—focusing on seamless communication and digital guest management. While its feature count is lower, its strong PMS integration and customization options enable tailored communication and operational flexibility.
Edge: Crave.
Both products receive near-perfect ratings for support, with Crave at 4.79/5 and Guestnet at 4.82/5. Crave’s reviews praise its quick response times and helpful staff, with comments like “their service team addressed my questions at any time of day or night,” indicating high reliability.
Guestnet’s customer support is also highly regarded, with many users noting their team’s availability and helpfulness. One review states, “Guestnet’s support team is always available and helpful,” making it a strong choice for hotels seeking ongoing assistance.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet experiences more recent reviews and has a higher overall rating (96.36) compared to Crave’s 75.16 on the HT Score. Its total review count (152) surpasses Crave’s 48, with recent feedback highlighting ease of use, customization, and support.
Crave’s ratings are slightly lower, mainly due to older reviews and fewer recent reviews, which reduces confidence in current performance. Hotels that value the latest feedback and higher overall ratings will find Guestnet more appealing.
Edge: Guestnet.
Crave’s base price is $400 per month, with no freemium or trial options, making it a predictable investment for hotels seeking a comprehensive platform. Guestnet’s base fee is $500 per month, also without trial or freemium options, slightly higher but justified by its broader integrations and customization.
Pricing reflects the scope of features; Crave’s extensive functionalities might justify its slightly lower price point for hotels prioritizing automation. Both are subscription models with no implementation fees disclosed, so consider your budget and required features.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a browser-based solution or less reliance on mobile apps, or if you need a more straightforward, less feature-rich system.
Not ideal if: Your hotel prefers a minimal setup, or if staff and guests are less tech-savvy and resistant to app-based interfaces.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a simple, out-of-the-box solution without extensive setup, or if your focus is on in-venue ordering and contactless payments.
Not ideal if: Your hotel has limited IT support or prefers a less customizable, more straightforward system.
Crave offers a robust, feature-rich platform designed for large, service-oriented hotels that want a dedicated app with extensive automation options. Its strengths lie in in-venue ordering, contactless payments, and detailed data insights, making it ideal for luxury or high-volume properties.
Guestnet provides a highly adaptable, web-based guest experience platform with superior recent reviews and high satisfaction scores. It’s best suited for hotels seeking seamless integrations, customization, and a no-download approach that appeals to a broad range of property types.
For hotels prioritizing advanced service automation and a wide feature set, Crave is the choice. If ease of use, recent high ratings, and integrated communication matter most, Guestnet should be your preferred solution.
Edge: Guestnet.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 Guestnet 共享 9 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 二维码 | ||
| 信用卡付款 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 数字菜单 | ||
| 现场订购 | ||
| 苹果支付 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 7 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
许多评论者表示,通过 Guestnet 快速访问酒店服务和设施提高了客人的满意度,从而带来了积极的反馈,并有可能增加回头客的数量。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
评论者们对 Guestnet 与当地旅游数据和酒店管理系统的集成表示赞赏,但也有一些评论者提到希望进一步集成,以增强自动化并减少人工操作。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 Guestnet 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Guestnet 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Guestnet 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。Guestnet:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,Guestnet 的为 96。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问