The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 67 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Credit Card Payments and Payments Integrations.
Great Stay App 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Profiles and Mobile Checkin.
基于 HTR 上 67 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 0 |
在分析了 67 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 Great Stay App 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | #38 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | #38 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | #33 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #10 2 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | #36 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #8 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Crave Mobile Platform by Crave Interactive and Great Stay App hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Crave’s platform is a comprehensive, feature-rich mobile guest engagement solution with a strong track record, while Great Stay App offers a simplified, communication-focused experience with minimal features. Your decision depends on whether your hotel values extensive service automation or streamlined guest communication.
Crave boasts a higher review count, recent positive feedback, and more proven integrations. Great Stay App has limited reviews and regional presence, making Crave the more reliable choice for hotels seeking a mature, supported platform.
Crave Interactive and Great Stay App aim to enhance guest experiences but approach it differently. Crave’s platform offers a wide array of features designed to automate and facilitate in-venue services, such as digital menus, contactless ordering, Apple Pay, and NFC payments, accommodating hotels looking for robust service automation. In contrast, Great Stay App focuses on guest communication and engagement, offering features like guest profiles and mobile check-in, which are more suited for hotels emphasizing personalized communication.
Crave’s platform is web-based but also supports QR codes, making it accessible without requiring app downloads, while Great Stay App insists on app downloads, which might be a barrier for some guests. Crave’s extensive feature set and proven integrations (17 verified partners) demonstrate its maturity, whereas Great Stay App’s limited integrations suggest a more basic, communication-centric approach. Given these differences, which approach aligns better with your hotel’s operational goals and guest expectations?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, feature-packed guest engagement platform that supports in-venue ordering, digital payments, and extensive system integrations, Crave Interactive is the clear choice. Its reviews highlight high satisfaction levels, with a 4.75/5 overall rating from 48 reviews, and a recent NPS score of 9.15/10, indicating strong guest and hotelier approval.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes guest communication, feedback management, and basic engagement tools without complex automation, Great Stay App might seem suitable. However, with no recent reviews, zero star ratings, and limited regional presence, it’s less tested and reliable. For hotels looking to elevate operational efficiency and guest satisfaction, Crave’s proven, feature-rich solution is the recommended pick.
Crave scores a 4.61/5 for ease of use, supported by positive reviews praising its user-friendly interface and straightforward setup. Users commend the platform’s intuitive design for both staff and guests, as well as smooth onboarding, which averages 4.57/5. Hoteliers appreciate the proactive support, with a 4.79/5 support rating, and describe Crave’s setup process as efficient and guided.
Great Stay App’s ease of use is unverified, as it has no recent reviews or user ratings. Its minimal feature set and lack of detailed feedback suggest a simpler, potentially easier system but with unproven usability at scale. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s platform offers 16 unique features, including web-based access, QR codes, Apple Pay, digital menus, in-venue and multi-menu ordering, contactless payments, POS integration, and NFC. These enable comprehensive automation of guest services, sales, and operational workflows. Its feature set supports diverse hotel types and service models, making it versatile.
Great Stay App provides only 3 features—guest profiles, mobile check-in, and basic communication tools—limiting its scope mainly to guest engagement rather than service automation. Its feature count and capabilities are significantly lower, making Crave the superior option for hotels seeking extensive functionality. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave consistently receives high praise for support, with a 4.79/5 rating and reviews that laud quick, helpful responses, often resolving issues within minutes. Hoteliers describe Crave’s customer success team as proactive, accessible, and excellent at guiding through onboarding and troubleshooting.
Great Stay App’s customer support is unverified due to a lack of recent reviews and ratings. Without feedback, it’s difficult to assess support quality, making Crave’s well-documented service the safer choice. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave offers 17 verified integrations, including system partners like Interel, Book4Time, Quore, Oracle Hospitality, and Amadeus, supporting a broad ecosystem of hotel management tools. These integrations facilitate smoother operations and data flow across platforms.
Great Stay App has only 2 verified integrations, with RoomRaccoon and RUNNR.ai, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems. For hotels that need a connected, scalable solution, Crave’s extensive integrations provide clear advantage. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s ratings reflect strong satisfaction, with a 4.75/5 overall score, a 93% likelihood to recommend, and a 9.15/10 NPS score. Its reviews, all recent, emphasize ease of use, excellent support, and feature richness across various hotel segments, including luxury and branded hotels.
Great Stay App’s lack of recent reviews and ratings means there’s no current data supporting user satisfaction. Its absence of feedback makes it difficult to judge, but the clear data favors Crave. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave Interactive’s pricing starts at $400 for the base platform, with no freemium version, monthly flat fee, or implementation charges. Its straightforward pricing model is transparent and designed for hotels ready to invest in a comprehensive system.
Great Stay App’s pricing is not publicly listed, making direct comparison impossible. Without clear pricing data, the value proposition of Crave’s transparent model stands out for hotels seeking predictable costs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Crave’s platform offers a robust, feature-rich system designed to automate and streamline hotel services, with a proven track record and extensive integrations. Its wide feature set and high ratings make it suitable for properties needing comprehensive guest engagement and operational support.
Great Stay App is a simpler, communication-centered solution that may suit smaller or boutique hotels prioritizing direct guest engagement over automation. However, with limited reviews and features, it’s less suited for hotels seeking a scalable, integrated platform.
For hotels prioritizing automation, data-driven insights, and global support, Crave Interactive is the clear choice. If your hotel’s focus is on basic guest communication and check-in, and you’re in Europe, Great Stay App could suffice—but the safer, more supported option remains Crave.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 Great Stay App 共享 9 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 二维码 | ||
| 信用卡付款 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 数字菜单 | ||
| 现场订购 | ||
| 苹果支付 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 Great Stay App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Great Stay App 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Crave Mobile Platform 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。Great Stay App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,Great Stay App 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问