The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 67 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payments and Guest Messaging.
TigerTMS 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 67 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 0 |
在分析了 67 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 TigerTMS 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #10 2 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #8 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Crave Mobile Platform by Crave Interactive and iPortal by TigerTMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to elevate guest experience through mobile services, but their features, support, and market presence differ significantly. Crave, with its extensive reviews and recent positive feedback, clearly dominates in credibility and depth of offerings. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s operational goals and guest engagement goals?
Crave Interactive’s platform is a well-established, feature-rich solution designed to boost guest engagement, streamline service requests, and increase revenue. Its recent reviews highlight a high overall rating (4.75/5) and glowing customer support (4.79/5), especially praised for ease of use and onboarding. Conversely, iPortal by TigerTMS claims a broad functionality set but lacks recent reviews or a measurable user base, raising questions about its current market effectiveness.
While both products aim to digitize guest services, Crave’s proven track record and recent feedback suggest it is more reliable for hotels seeking a mature, supported solution. iPortal appears to be less tested in live hotel environments, making it a riskier choice unless specific features align uniquely with your needs. Are you willing to invest in a platform with proven success versus exploring a less documented alternative?
If your hotel prioritizes a platform with a proven track record, extensive features, and strong customer support, Crave is the clear choice. Its user-friendly interface, high review scores, and broad regional presence (operating in 14 countries) make it suitable for luxury hotels, resorts, and branded properties aiming for high guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
On the other hand, if your hotel needs a simple, PMS-integrated guest app with basic functionalities like chat, bill viewing, or HVAC control, and you are comfortable with its undisclosed support and recent market presence, iPortal could suffice. However, with no recent reviews or detailed feature data, it’s less compelling for hotels seeking reliability and proven ROI.
Given Crave’s review count (48 reviews in the last 6 months) and its 93% likelihood to recommend, it clearly outperforms iPortal in credibility. Would you prefer a platform with transparent, recent user feedback or one with limited publicly available data?
Crave’s platform scores a 4.61/5 for ease of use, with users describing the interface as “super customizable,” “user-friendly,” and “easy for guests to understand.” Customer onboarding is rated 4.57/5, and many reviews mention quick setup and proactive support, making staff adoption straightforward.
In contrast, iPortal offers no specific ratings or recent user feedback, leaving its ease of use unverified. The absence of reviews about onboarding or user experience makes it difficult to gauge how quickly your team can adopt and start benefiting from the platform.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s platform boasts 25 unique features, including hotel directory, multi-lingual support, contactless ordering, payments (Apple Pay, Google Pay), room service, QR codes, and NFC capabilities—many tailored for enhancing guest engagement and operational automation. These features are absent from iPortal, which offers no detailed feature list or unique functionalities.
iPortal’s broad integration with PMS and services like guest chat, bill viewing, and auto check-out are helpful but lack the specialized features found in Crave, especially in digital menus, in-venue ordering, and upselling tools. Crave’s extensive feature set provides more avenues to increase revenue and guest satisfaction.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s customer support scores an impressive 4.79/5, with reviews highlighting quick, polite responses and proactive problem-solving. Hoteliers consistently mention their support team’s responsiveness, even during off-hours, as a key strength.
There are no recent reviews or support ratings available for iPortal, making it impossible to assess its responsiveness or quality. Without documented user experiences, Crave’s support reputation clearly makes it the safer choice for hotels that rely on prompt assistance.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave integrates with 17 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Infor, and Amadeus, providing flexible options for linking with property management, POS, and other hotel systems. Its broad partner network ensures compatibility with many existing systems.
iPortal connects with 28 verified partners, including Mews, RMS, and protel, and offers more extensive integration options. If your hotel already uses a specific PMS or hospitality system, check for shared integrations—iPortal has a slight edge in partner count.
Edge: TigerTMS (iPortal).
Crave’s recent reviews (0 in the last 6 months, but a total of 48 reviews) reflect a high overall rating of 4.75/5 and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Property types such as luxury, branded, and boutique hotels consistently praise its ease of use, feature set, and support.
iPortal has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Without current feedback, it’s safer to trust Crave’s proven reputation and high rating.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s pricing starts at a base fee of $400, with no freemium, monthly flat, or per-room charges. Its transparent pricing structure simplifies budgeting, with no implementation fees or trial options listed.
Pricing for iPortal is undisclosed, making it difficult to compare costs directly. Given Crave’s clear, upfront pricing, it provides better value certainty for your hotel’s budgeting.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Crave Interactive stands out with its extensive feature set, proven performance, and strong support, making it ideal for hotels seeking a reliable, mature guest engagement platform. Its recent reviews and high ratings underscore its credibility and ongoing value for hotels across segments.
iPortal offers broad integrations and some core guest services but lacks recent user feedback and detailed feature explanations, making it a less confident choice for hotels prioritizing proven results. Unless your hotel’s needs are minimal and your tech setup is compatible, Crave is the more secure investment.
In summary, if you want a trusted, well-reviewed product with a proven track record, Crave is the recommended choice. For hotels needing basic, PMS-integrated guest services and willing to explore a less documented platform, iPortal could suffice but with added risk.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 iPortal (by Tiger TMS) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 请求管理 | ||
| 酒店目录 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 13 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 iPortal (by Tiger TMS) 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 iPortal (by Tiger TMS) 提供 28 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Crave Mobile Platform 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。iPortal (by Tiger TMS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,TigerTMS 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问