The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 92 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 客户服务 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Credit Card Payments and Payments Integrations.
TouchMenu 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Profiles and Mobile Checkin.
基于 HTR 上 92 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 25 |
在分析了 92 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 TouchMenu 用户则强调 提升宾客体验, 运营效率, 易于使用。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
+
提升宾客体验
▾
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
+
支持和响应
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
−
与现有系统集成
▾
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | #12 7 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | #10 13 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | #11 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | #12 12 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | #10 17 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | #13 7 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #10 2 条评价 | #11 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | #18 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | #10 22 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #8 2 条评价 | #10 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | — |
When selecting a guest app platform, your hotel needs a solution that enhances guest engagement, streamlines operations, and boosts revenue. Both Crave Mobile Platform and TouchMenu aim to address these needs, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly. Crave focuses on mobile access that's integrated across hotel services, while TouchMenu emphasizes a fully digital, AI-driven guest experience. Which platform best aligns with your hotel’s priorities?
Crave Mobile Platform by Crave Interactive has been around since 2009, with 48 reviews and a recent average rating of 4.75/5, making it a proven choice for hotels seeking reliable service automation. TouchMenu, founded in 2020, has 25 reviews with a slightly higher overall rating of 77.4, but fewer recent reviews, which diminishes the strength of its current data. Crave’s long-standing presence and larger review base suggest more tested stability, but TouchMenu's higher recent satisfaction score indicates growing momentum. Do you prioritize platform stability or immediate guest experience?
Crave specializes in mobile, app-less access to hotel services via QR codes and contactless options, with 16 unique features. TouchMenu offers broader automation capabilities, including AI-powered insights, guest profiling, and integrations that may help with revenue growth. Crave's focus is on easy, instant access for guests, while TouchMenu aims to automate and personalize the entire guest journey. Which approach aligns better with your operational goals?
If your hotel prioritizes straightforward, reliable guest access to services like menu browsing, ordering, and contactless payments, Crave is your best choice. Its user-friendly interface, extensive integrations, and proven support make it ideal for hotels seeking to enhance service speed and reduce manual errors.
If your needs lean toward an innovative, fully digital guest experience with AI-driven insights, personalized communication, and operational automation, TouchMenu is more suitable. Its ability to integrate booking, ordering, and guest messaging helps hotels aiming to increase revenue through upselling and data-driven guest engagement.
For hotels that want a mature platform with a proven track record, Crave’s larger review count and recent positive feedback support a safer choice. Conversely, if your hotel is looking to experiment with newer tech and personalized automation, TouchMenu's higher recent NPS score indicates strong current satisfaction.
Crave’s UI/UX has a high ease of use rating at 4.61/5, with many reviews praising its simplicity and helpful onboarding, though some users mention that menu creation could be more intuitive. It has a solid onboarding score of 4.57/5, indicating a smooth initial setup, but its interface may feel slightly dated compared to newer platforms.
TouchMenu boasts a slightly higher ease of use rating at 4.96/5 and an onboarding score of 4.96/5, with many reviewers emphasizing its intuitive and quick setup. Its modern design and straightforward navigation are frequently praised, making adoption easier for staff and guests alike.
Edge: TouchMenu.
Crave offers 16 unique features, including web-based access, QR codes, Apple Pay, digital menus, in-venue and contactless ordering, POS and payment integrations, curbside pickup, tipping, upselling, scheduling, and NFC. These features make Crave highly versatile for various service scenarios.
TouchMenu provides 2 exclusive features—guest profiles and mobile check-in—focusing on personalization and operational automation, alongside the 9 shared features like ordering and booking.
While Crave has a broader feature set, TouchMenu's focus on data-driven personalization may deliver more immediate revenue opportunities.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s customer support scores a strong 4.79/5, with reviewers highlighting quick response times and proactive assistance, though some mention the back-end system could be more modern. Crave’s support team is praised for resolving issues swiftly, which is critical during implementation.
TouchMenu scores a perfect 5/5 in support and onboarding, with reviews emphasizing responsiveness and ease of getting help. Many users appreciate its dedicated team helping them integrate and troubleshoot in real-time.
Edge: TouchMenu.
Crave’s platform connects with 17 verified partners, including major systems like Oracle Hospitality, Infor, Amadeus, and POS solutions, offering extensive options for hotel integration. These integrations support complex hotel operations and large-scale deployments.
TouchMenu has only 4 verified partners, with notable support for Stripe, Clock, and Mews, but fewer integrations overall. Its limited partner network suggests it may be less adaptable for complex or large hotel chains.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s 48 reviews include an overall rating of 4.75/5, with many praising its reliability, ease of use, and customer service. Its older reviews reflect sustained performance across different hotel segments, especially luxury and branded hotels.
TouchMenu’s 25 reviews rate it very highly at 77.4, with recent reviews giving it a score of 98% likelihood to recommend, especially among luxury hotels. However, its smaller review base and lack of older feedback mean less long-term validation.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s pricing starts at a base fee of $400, with no mention of monthly or per-room charges, and no free tier or trial. TouchMenu’s base price is $300, also without ongoing fees or trials. Both platforms appear to favor upfront pricing, but Crave’s higher base fee might reflect its broader features.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a highly customizable or AI-driven personalization approach, as Crave’s options are somewhat limited in customization.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a broad set of integrations or relies heavily on legacy hotel management systems, as TouchMenu offers fewer partner options.
Crave Mobile Platform provides a reliable, feature-rich, and well-supported guest app system with proven stability and extensive integrations. It is ideal for hotels seeking a mature solution with broad functionality, especially larger properties or chains.
TouchMenu, meanwhile, offers a modern, highly rated user experience with a focus on personalization and automation. Its strengths lie in guest profiling and operational streamlining, making it best suited for hotels aiming to innovate quickly with AI-driven tools.
If your hotel values stability, proven support, and extensive integrations, choose Crave. If you prioritize a sleek user interface, guest personalization, and automation, TouchMenu is the better fit.
In conclusion, Crave’s larger review base and recent positive feedback make it the safer, more reliable choice today. However, TouchMenu’s high satisfaction scores highlight its potential for hotels ready to embrace newer, smarter guest engagement solutions.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 TouchMenu 共享 9 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 二维码 | ||
| 信用卡付款 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 数字菜单 | ||
| 现场订购 | ||
| 苹果支付 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 6 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常提到 TouchMenu 如何通过无缝订购、个性化体验和无需身体接触的轻松沟通显著提高客人满意度,这对于现代酒店业至关重要。
评论者对 TouchMenu 通过集成订购和预订功能简化操作表示赞赏。这种自动化减少了对直接员工参与的需求,提高了运营效率,并通过减少纸张使用帮助遵循绿色倡议。
许多评论都强调了 TouchMenu 的用户友好界面,让客人和员工都可以轻松地与系统互动。其直观的设计消除了使用障碍,鼓励不同用户群体更广泛地采用该系统。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
多项评论强调该软件支持与现有物业管理和面向客人的系统集成,这有助于维持不同酒店功能之间的无缝运营。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 TouchMenu 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 TouchMenu 提供 4 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。TouchMenu 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。TouchMenu:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,TouchMenu 的为 78。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问