项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 216 条经验证的评价后,Criton 用户最看重其 ,而 Guestnet 用户则强调 易用性与直观流程, support_and_product_evolution, 客人信息集中与数字通信。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性与直观流程
▾
|
|
|
+
Support_and_product_evolution
▾
|
|
|
+
客人信息集中与数字通信
▾
|
|
|
+
内容定制、品牌化与个性化
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Bill_viewing_checkout_and_pms_integration
▾
|
|
|
−
Tv_and_multi_channel_distribution
▾
|
|
|
−
Reports_analytics_and_admin_controls
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 14 条评价 | #2 72 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #18 4 条评价 | #2 87 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #18 2 条评价 | #7 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #27 0 条评价 | #29 0 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 7 条评价 | #3 61 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #13 10 条评价 | #2 81 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 3 条评价 | #5 21 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 4 条评价 | #3 14 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #10 2 条评价 | #14 3 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #12 18 条评价 | #2 186 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #19 0 条评价 | #16 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right guest app platform can significantly impact your hotel’s guest experience, operational efficiency, and revenue. Both Criton and Guestnet aim to digitize communication and enhance guest engagement, but they diverge in scale, features, and recent user feedback. Criton offers a well-established solution with a smaller review base, while Guestnet boasts a broader adoption and more recent, positive reviews. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s current needs and future growth?
Criton is an award-winning platform primarily known for its flexible, branded mobile apps that replace printed materials and support contactless services like mobile check-in and digital keys. Guestnet, on the other hand, offers a fully customizable web app that integrates seamlessly into your existing ecosystem, emphasizing multi-channel communication and upselling.
Criton’s score on HotelTechReport (HTR) is 0, reflecting its limited data and review volume, while Guestnet scores over 96, backed by 152 recent reviews. The contrast in review recency and volume suggests Guestnet’s user experience and support are currently more validated. Are you comfortable with a platform that shows proven, recent performance, or do you prefer a smaller, potentially more customizable solution?
If your hotel prioritizes a mobile app with a strong focus on branded guest engagement, mobile check-in, and in-room messaging, Criton is the better choice. Its focus on creating a customized app that can replace printed materials and support contactless services makes it ideal for boutique, resort, or independent hotels.
If your hotel needs a flexible, multi-channel communication tool that integrates easily with PMS systems, supports upselling, and offers broad regional coverage, Guestnet is the better fit. It’s especially suitable for hotels wanting to streamline operations, automate guest communication, and engage guests across various platforms.
For properties that prioritize a dedicated mobile app experience, go with Criton. If seamless integration, multi-channel content distribution, and recent positive reviews matter more, choose Guestnet.
Criton’s user rating for ease of use is 4.5/5 based on feedback from hotel staff and guests, with many praising its simple, intuitive interface and straightforward content management. Onboarding is rated 4.36/5, and users mention that creating and updating content is generally quick and manageable, although some desire more templates and customization options.
Guestnet scores slightly higher at 4.74/5, with users emphasizing its user-friendly, intuitive web interface, and seamless navigation. Support and onboarding are rated at 4.82/5, with recent reviews highlighting how quickly staff adopt the platform and how well it integrates into daily operations.
Edge: Guestnet.
Criton’s core strengths include mobile check-in, digital keys, in-room messaging, push notifications, and customizable branded mobile apps—totaling 10 features, but no unique features exclusive to it. Its focus is primarily on mobile app engagement, content control, and contactless services.
Guestnet offers a broader feature set—12 features, including a web app accessible via browsers and automatic multi-lingual translations, which Criton lacks. It also integrates with more third-party systems and supports digital ordering directly linked to POS systems.
Edge: Guestnet.
Criton’s support ratings hover around 4.62/5, with reviews praising their responsiveness and commitment to developing the platform, though some users note the feature rollout can be slow. Support is considered reliable but not exceptional, according to recent reviews.
Guestnet outperforms with a 4.82/5 rating, with users often describing their support as proactive, helpful, and quick to resolve issues. Recent reviews commend Guestnet’s dedicated onboarding and ongoing assistance, citing a higher level of responsiveness.
Edge: Guestnet.
Criton connects with 16 verified partners, including major PMS providers like Net Affinity, RMS, Oracle Hospitality, and Maestro PMS. Guestnet has 20 verified integrations, including critical systems like ASA, Casablanca, and FLEXIPASS, plus shared partners such as Mews.
Both platforms support extensive integrations, but Guestnet’s wider partner network and more recent additions give it an edge for hotels seeking seamless connectivity with various hotel management and ancillary systems.
Edge: Guestnet.
Criton’s limited review count (21) and older reviews suggest its ratings are less reflective of current performance, but it scores 4.71/5 overall. Guestnet, with 152 reviews, consistently scores over 9.5/10 (96.36/100), and recent reviews highlight high satisfaction across multiple hotel segments, especially luxury and boutique hotels.
Guestnet’s recent, numerous reviews and higher ratings demonstrate stronger, more consistent hoteliers’ approval. The platform’s latest feedback supports its reputation as a reliable, effective guest engagement system.
Edge: Guestnet.
Criton does not publicly list pricing; it likely offers tailored quotes based on hotel size and needs. Guestnet charges a flat $500 monthly fee, with no implementation or setup fees, making its costs transparent and predictable.
Considering the limited pricing transparency and value for money, Guestnet’s clear pricing model appeals to hotels wanting predictable costs. Criton’s custom quotes could be more expensive or vary widely.
Not ideal if your team values broad multi-channel communication or prefers a web-based solution accessible from any device.
Not ideal if you prefer a dedicated mobile app or have limited budget for ongoing subscription costs.
Criton is a solid choice for hotels that want a branded mobile app focused on contactless services, especially if they value branding and visual customization. Its smaller review base suggests a stable but less validated recent user experience, and it’s most suitable for boutique or independent hotels that want to replace printed materials.
Guestnet excels in multi-channel communication, broad integrations, and a high volume of recent positive reviews. It’s best for hotels seeking a flexible, scalable platform that enhances operational efficiency and guest engagement through a web-based interface.
If your hotel needs a proven, high-rated solution with recent validation, go with Guestnet. For a targeted mobile app experience emphasizing branding and in-stay revenue, Criton may still be worth considering—but keep in mind its limited recent feedback.
In conclusion, the platform with the most recent and numerous reviews, Guestnet, is better positioned to meet your hotel’s evolving guest communication needs today.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Communication & Messaging
|
|
|
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 请求管理 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
|
▾
Content Management
|
|
|
| 酒店目录 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 当地推荐 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
|
▾
Upselling
|
|
|
| 付款 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
|
▾
Request Management
|
|
|
| 请求管理 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 移动结帐 | ||
| 手机值机 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
排名更高的方面
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评测者强调Guestnet在员工和宾客方面的操作简单、直观,内容变更快速、结构清晰。同时,也有人指出后台任务、排版或某些设置仍可能显得繁琐,尤其是对前台员... 许多评测者强调Guestnet在员工和宾客方面的操作简单、直观,内容变更快速、结构清晰。同时,也有人指出后台任务、排版或某些设置仍可能显得繁琐,尤其是对前台员工或新用户来说。
支持服务常被赞为响应迅速、友好且以解决方案为导向,许多评价者表示Guestnet不断通过新功能和定期优化进行改进。另一部分较小但重要的用户希望获得更快速的支持... 支持服务常被赞为响应迅速、友好且以解决方案为导向,许多评价者表示Guestnet不断通过新功能和定期优化进行改进。另一部分较小但重要的用户希望获得更快速的支持渠道,更好地落实反馈意见,以及在边缘案例和用户请求的改进方面持续推动产品开发。
评审者通常表示 Guestnet 将酒店、服务和目的地信息集中在一个应用或网页应用中,方便客人无需打电话到前台就能找到所需内容。酒店反馈这减少了重复性问题,改善... 评审者通常表示 Guestnet 将酒店、服务和目的地信息集中在一个应用或网页应用中,方便客人无需打电话到前台就能找到所需内容。酒店反馈这减少了重复性问题,改善了日常运营,并带来了内容始终更新的更有序的客人体验。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
酒店重视 Guestnet 在显示账单、加快结账流程以及与 PMS/ASA 和其他酒店系统同步方面的作用。然而,这也是最容易出现问题的环节之一:评论者提到账单的可见性规... 酒店重视 Guestnet 在显示账单、加快结账流程以及与 PMS/ASA 和其他酒店系统同步方面的作用。然而,这也是最容易出现问题的环节之一:评论者提到账单的可见性规则、同步错误、团体预订/隐私复杂性以及缺失的集成,都是导致工作流程仍需优化的原因。
多篇评价提到Guestnet能够将内容扩展到电视、数字标牌和其他渠道,而不仅仅是应用程序。酒店喜欢通过这种方式广播酒店和区域信息的覆盖范围和简便性,但也有一些... 多篇评价提到Guestnet能够将内容扩展到电视、数字标牌和其他渠道,而不仅仅是应用程序。酒店喜欢通过这种方式广播酒店和区域信息的覆盖范围和简便性,但也有一些反馈称存在设置问题、兼容性有限,或希望实现更流畅的多渠道发布。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Criton 和 Guestnet 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Criton 提供 15 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Guestnet 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Guestnet 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Criton:否。Guestnet:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Criton 的 HT Score 为 0,Guestnet 的为 97。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐