The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Fideltour |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 13 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 12 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Fideltour |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #13 13 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #17 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #22 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #5 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Fideltour |
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #11 25 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel CRM and email marketing software hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Fideltour’s CRM offers minimal features but strong support and limited recent reviews, whereas ReGuest provides a feature-rich platform with more recent feedback and a larger user base. Both aim to streamline guest relationships, but their approaches and capabilities diverge significantly.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-use system with reliable support, Fideltour might seem appealing. Yet, for hotels seeking advanced segmentation, automation, and a proven track record, ReGuest stands out as the more credible option.
Fideltour’s CRM is designed to centralize customer data and manage basic guest relationships. However, it lacks features like automation, segmentation, and detailed analytics, which are crucial in today’s competitive hotel market. ReGuest, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive suite that includes email campaigns, guest profiling, automation, and segmentation, backed by 20 verified integrations and a more recent and larger review base.
While Fideltour’s reviews are scarce and outdated, ReGuest has accumulated 27 recent reviews in the last six months, with a 97% likelihood of recommending it. This indicates that ReGuest is more actively trusted and used by hotels today. Would you prefer a basic, less supported CRM or a feature-rich, well-rated platform?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable CRM with automation, segmentation, and multiple communication channels, opt for ReGuest. It’s suitable for properties focused on increasing direct bookings, personalized marketing, and guest engagement, especially as it integrates with numerous booking platforms and provides tools for targeted campaigns.
Conversely, if your team only requires simple guest data management and basic communication without complex automation or segmentation, Fideltour might suffice. But given the complete lack of recent reviews and features, ReGuest’s proven track record makes it the safer investment for hotels aiming for growth and efficiency.
ReGuest scores a 4.81 out of 5 for ease of use, reflecting a user-friendly interface, quick onboarding, and high adoption rates, supported by positive reviews praising its intuitive design. Fideltour, with a zero rating in this area, offers no recent user feedback, suggesting a lack of clarity or modern design.
Hotels that value fast, straightforward implementation and minimal training should lean toward ReGuest. Its recent reviews emphasize simplicity and support, making it easier for your team to adopt and start benefiting quickly. Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest boasts 24 unique features, including personalized communication, event-based automations, email newsletters, guest profiles, GDPR compliance, de-duplication, segmentation, and a centralized data warehouse. Fideltour, with no features listed or available, clearly lags behind in capabilities.
If your hotel needs advanced automation, targeted marketing, and detailed guest insights, ReGuest’s feature set is unmatched. Fideltour’s minimal offerings make it less suitable for hotels seeking modern, sophisticated CRM functionalities. Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest’s support is highly rated at 4.93 out of 5, with reviewers praising its helpfulness, responsiveness, and onboarding process. Fideltour’s support ratings are unavailable, but the absence of recent reviews suggests a lack of active support or customer engagement.
Hotels that prioritize reliable, prompt assistance should opt for ReGuest, especially given its recent positive feedback. Fideltour’s support quality remains unverified, making ReGuest the safer choice. Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest offers 20 verified integrations, including popular platforms like Mews, Simple Booking, Seekda, and Vertical Booking, facilitating seamless data flow and operational consistency. Fideltour’s integration count is zero, limiting connection options and automation potential.
If your hotel relies on multiple third-party systems and values a connected tech stack, ReGuest’s integrations are vital. Fideltour’s lack of integrations could hinder growth and efficiency. Edge: ReGuest.
ReGuest’s recent reviews reveal a 97% likelihood of recommendation, with high scores for ease of use, support, and value. Hotels across boutique, resort, and other segments rate it highly, with feedback emphasizing its intuitive interface and automation capabilities.
Fideltour’s review count and recency are zero, so it lacks current user validation. Given the active positive feedback for ReGuest, it’s the clearer preferred choice for hoteliers seeking proven satisfaction. Edge: ReGuest.
Pricing details for Fideltour are unavailable, and it does not offer a free trial or visible pricing structure. ReGuest also does not publish exact prices but indicates no implementation fees or monthly charges, suggesting flexible or custom pricing.
Without transparent costs, your best approach is to request quotes from both providers. However, ReGuest’s transparent and straightforward approach to pricing, combined with its extensive features, makes it more predictable for budgeting.
Fideltour’s lack of recent reviews and features makes it unsuitable for hotels aiming to modernize and grow.
ReGuest’s extensive features and recent positive reviews make it ideal for hotels wanting to elevate their guest relationships.
ReGuest’s core advantage is its extensive, feature-rich platform, supported by recent, positive user feedback, making it a more reliable choice for modern hotels. Fideltour offers a barebones CRM with limited support and no recent reviews, which raises questions about ongoing development and reliability.
If your hotel prioritizes automation, segmentation, integrations, and proven user satisfaction, choose ReGuest. For very small or budget-conscious properties with minimal needs, Fideltour might suffice, but overall, ReGuest’s recent data and features make it the stronger pick.
In summary: For hotels seeking a modern, well-supported, and feature-rich CRM, ReGuest dominates thanks to its extensive capabilities and recent positive reviews. Fideltour’s minimal approach and outdated feedback make it less suitable for hotels aiming for growth, automation, and data-driven marketing. Your choice should reflect your hotel’s ambition to improve guest engagement and operational efficiency.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
RE:Guest 的客户服务因其乐于助人和响应迅速而屡获好评。客户认为其支持团队耐心且知识渊博,为提升产品整体用户体验做出了积极贡献。
用户称赞 RE:Guest 能够通过其客户关系管理 (CRM) 工具和销售活动功能,创建个性化的客户沟通信息。此功能有助于根据客户的个人偏好定制信息,从而显著提升客户... 用户称赞 RE:Guest 能够通过其客户关系管理 (CRM) 工具和销售活动功能,创建个性化的客户沟通信息。此功能有助于根据客户的个人偏好定制信息,从而显著提升客户体验。
将个性化聊天机器人集成到 RE:Guest 系统中获得了积极评价,用户注意到客户满意度有所提升,运营流程也更加有序。该工具在提升客户体验方面的作用得到了证实。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
现有界面受到一些批评,部分用户认为其复杂且需要改进,尤其是在设置和信息文本管理方面。用户建议改进界面,以简化导航和繁琐的设置调整。
部分用户希望与第三方系统(例如 Vioma Clearing)进行更深入的集成。这种集成对于实现全面的数据可视化和提高运营效率至关重要。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CRM 和 ReGuest Hotel CRM 共享许多核心 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 功能,但各有独特的能力。CRM 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ReGuest Hotel CRM 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ReGuest Hotel CRM 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CRM:否。ReGuest Hotel CRM:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Fideltour 的 HT Score 为 0,Reguest 的为 81。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案