项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 1,344 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and fast onboarding 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的住宿设施 (4.5/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Centralized user & role management and Unlimited Channels (no additional cost).
DerbySoft 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 .
在分析了 1,344 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 ease of use and fast onboarding, channel synchronization and ota connectivity, 报告与分析,而 DerbySoft 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of use and fast onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel synchronization and OTA connectivity
▾
|
|
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化平台整合
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
基于日历的预订管理
▾
|
|
|
−
支付、开票和财务工作流程
▾
|
|
|
−
客户支持响应速度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 572 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 171 条评价 | #41 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 42 条评价 | #19 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #11 4 条评价 | #16 2 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 484 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 213 条评价 | #34 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 108 条评价 | #29 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 92 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #1 405 条评价 | #17 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 183 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 231 条评价 | #17 3 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #6 14 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right channel management solution can transform your hotel's distribution operations. Cloudbeds' channel manager, myallocator, is a comprehensive, user-friendly platform trusted by over a thousand hotels worldwide, boasting a high rating and recent reviews. DerbySoft’s Connectivity Services, meanwhile, offers specialized connectivity solutions favored by larger chains for their extensive network and real-time ARI delivery, though with fewer recent reviews. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s size, needs, and growth plans?
Both Cloudbeds and DerbySoft aim to streamline distribution, but they serve different hotel profiles. Cloudbeds’ myallocator excels across various property types, especially independents and boutique hotels, thanks to its ease of use, broad integrations, and scalability. DerbySoft focuses on large-scale distribution for bigger hotel groups, emphasizing reliability, extensive network coverage, and real-time data synchronization. Will your hotel benefit more from a flexible, all-in-one platform or a specialized connectivity service?
If your hotel needs a versatile, all-in-one platform that integrates PMS, booking engine, and channel management, Cloudbeds is your best choice. Its strong user base includes independent hotels, hostels, and boutique properties, with over 1,000 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 4.64/5. Conversely, DerbySoft’s Connectivity Services is ideal for larger chains seeking extensive distribution, real-time ARI, and robust data security, but it’s less suited for small or independent hotels. Does your property require a comprehensive management platform or just reliable connectivity?
Cloudbeds’ intuitive interface, rated 4.6/5 by users, is praised for its straightforward setup and daily operations, making staff onboarding quick and simple. DerbySoft’s platform, rated 4.5/5, is also user-friendly but caters more to technical teams managing multiple properties, which may involve a steeper learning curve. For your team, ease of use and rapid onboarding are key to operational efficiency.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 17 shared features alongside two exclusive ones—centralized user & role management and unlimited channels—enhancing operational control and scalability. DerbySoft provides core connectivity functions with fewer proprietary features but excels in broad distribution, real-time ARI, and extensive network coverage. For hotels wanting a feature-rich, integrated system, Cloudbeds holds an advantage. Are you prioritizing comprehensive property management or just connectivity?
Cloudbeds’ customer support, rated 4.41/5, has mixed reviews; some praise its responsiveness, but others cite delays. One reviewer said, “Reservation management is a breeze with Cloudbeds because everything is seamlessly integrated,” yet a negative review called support "unresponsive." DerbySoft’s support scores higher at 4.83/5, with clients describing their team as “friendly, quick to respond, and effective.” For ongoing support, DerbySoft currently leads.
Edge: DerbySoft.
Cloudbeds boasts over 190 verified partners—covering OTAs, payment gateways, and ancillary services—giving your hotel flexibility to build a tailored tech stack. DerbySoft’s network is more limited, with 16 verified partners, though it partners with key industry players like Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and Infor. If broad integration options are a priority, Cloudbeds offers significantly more.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ recent reviews, from a broad segment including boutique hotels and hostels, give it a high rating of 4.64/5, with 74 reviews in the last 6 months. Hotel managers praise its ease of use and operational control, especially in independent properties. DerbySoft’s limited review volume—only six reviews—prevents a detailed comparison, but the high satisfaction score of 9.17/10 indicates strong support among its users. Given the volume and recency, Cloudbeds’ rating is more reflective of current user experience.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ channel manager costs $200 per month with no implementation or trial fees, offering transparent, predictable pricing suitable for small to medium hotels. DerbySoft’s service begins at $1,000 monthly, reflecting its focus on large hotel groups requiring extensive distribution. For independent hotels and smaller properties, Cloudbeds provides a more affordable and straightforward pricing model.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds’ myallocator is a versatile, easy-to-use channel management platform that combines PMS, booking engine, and distribution tools in one solution. Its broader feature set, larger partner network, and recent high ratings make it suitable for small to medium properties seeking growth and operational efficiency.
DerbySoft’s Connectivity Services deliver reliable, real-time distribution for large hotel groups, emphasizing extensive network coverage and data security. Its limited review volume and higher price point make it less attractive for smaller hotels.
If your hotel is independent or boutique, prioritizes ease of use, and needs a comprehensive platform, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. For large hotel chains needing robust, enterprise-level connectivity, DerbySoft is a reliable option, though it lacks the recent review volume to fully confirm satisfaction.
In summary, for most hotels—especially those seeking a flexible, all-in-one system—Cloudbeds’ myallocator outperforms DerbySoft in current user satisfaction, features, and affordability.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
费率管理
|
|
|
| 支持每周和每月费率 | ||
| 收益规则 | ||
| 派生费率 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 库存网格 | ||
|
▾
房间类型映射
|
|
|
| 通道自映射 | ||
|
▾
自动化与同步
|
|
|
| 批量更新和多重限制 | ||
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
|
▾
管理和设置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多币种支持 | ||
| 库存网格 | ||
| 综合支付处理 | ||
|
▾
分析和报告
|
|
|
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 预订绩效和进度报告 | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Many reviewers describe Cloudbeds as intuitive, easy to learn, and simple to teach to staff, which lowers training time and helps small teams adopt it... Many reviewers describe Cloudbeds as intuitive, easy to learn, and simple to teach to staff, which lowers training time and helps small teams adopt it quickly. This ease of use is often tied to operational efficiency, especially for independent hotels and guesthouses that want a system staff can handle without heavy technical knowledge.
Users repeatedly say Cloudbeds keeps inventory and rates synced across major OTAs, reducing double bookings, rate mismatches, and manual updates. This... Users repeatedly say Cloudbeds keeps inventory and rates synced across major OTAs, reducing double bookings, rate mismatches, and manual updates. This is one of the clearest value drivers in the reviews because it improves distribution accuracy and frees staff time.
报告是Cloudbeds最受重视的优势之一,特别是在入住率、收入、渠道表现和年度对比分析方面。与此同时,许多用户希望拥有更现代的仪表盘、更快的下载速度以及更好... 报告是Cloudbeds最受重视的优势之一,特别是在入住率、收入、渠道表现和年度对比分析方面。与此同时,许多用户希望拥有更现代的仪表盘、更快的下载速度以及更好的自定义功能,以便管理层更容易使用报告做出决策。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
日历视图因使预订变得易于理解、更新和日常管理而受到广泛赞誉。评审者看重它可以加快前台工作流程、跟踪入住率,以及直接从日程视图处理拆分预订、房间分配和备... 日历视图因使预订变得易于理解、更新和日常管理而受到广泛赞誉。评审者看重它可以加快前台工作流程、跟踪入住率,以及直接从日程视图处理拆分预订、房间分配和备注等任务。
用户喜欢Cloudbeds的集成支付处理、账单交易和发票/收据创建,因为它们简化了结账流程并减少了后台工作。然而,一些评论要求更强的本地支付集成、符合税务的开... 用户喜欢Cloudbeds的集成支付处理、账单交易和发票/收据创建,因为它们简化了结账流程并减少了后台工作。然而,一些评论要求更强的本地支付集成、符合税务的开票、可编辑的报价以及针对不同市场更灵活的计费工作流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 和 Connectivity Services by DerbySoft 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 提供 200 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Connectivity Services by DerbySoft 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator):否。Connectivity Services by DerbySoft:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 98,DerbySoft 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐