The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #31 3 条评价 | #7 101 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #43 0 条评价 | #10 36 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #25 0 条评价 | #6 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 2 条评价 | #8 70 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #31 2 条评价 | #9 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #39 0 条评价 | #11 20 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 0 条评价 | #12 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #33 0 条评价 | #6 166 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #21 4 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #10 3 条评价 | #21 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #16 0 条评价 | #19 1 条评价 |
Choosing between DJUBO and innRoad involves evaluating how each platform addresses your hotel’s unique management needs. Both promise to streamline operations, but their core functionalities, target hotel segments, and support offerings differ significantly. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a more all-in-one platform with a broad feature set or a specialized system with extensive third-party integrations.
DJUBO offers a comprehensive, single-dashboard experience with high ratings across most categories, but innRoad’s larger review base and recent feedback provide a clearer picture of real-world performance. Which system will truly meet your operational expectations? Let's compare.
DJUBO and innRoad both serve as management tools for hotels, but they approach this goal differently. DJUBO consolidates PMS, channel management, booking engine, POS, and revenue tools into one platform, aiming for complete visibility and control. In contrast, innRoad emphasizes seamless integration with OTAs, a strong booking engine, and a wide array of features designed specifically for independent hotels.
Recent reviews favor DJUBO, with 15 in the last six months and a higher overall rating of 5/5 and an NPS score of 9.63/5. innRoad’s 148 reviews yield a 4.72/5 rating but no recent feedback, making DJUBO’s recent data more trustworthy. Do you need a unified platform or a system with more integrations? The answer influences your best choice.
If your hotel needs a single platform that combines PMS, POS, revenue management, and guest feedback, DJUBO’s all-in-one approach is ideal. Its high ease of use ratings (4.95/5) and recent 15 reviews suggest your team will adopt it quickly, especially if you operate in regions where DJUBO is present, like North America or Europe.
However, if your hotel relies heavily on third-party channels, online booking, and OTA integrations, innRoad’s 34 integrations and high customer satisfaction (reviews rate it 4.72/5) with more recent feedback make it a better fit. InnRoad’s focus on independent hotels and its extensive booking engine capabilities benefit properties wanting to boost direct bookings and streamline operations.
DJUBO boasts a near-perfect ease of use score (4.95/5) based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, especially on mobile. Its onboarding process is rated 4.83/5, showing your team will likely learn the system quickly. Support staff are also highly rated (4.76/5), reinforcing confidence in user adoption.
InnRoad’s ease of use, rated at 4.47/5, is solid but slightly behind DJUBO. Users appreciate its straightforward reservation management and 24/7 support but mention UI improvements could help. Given the recent positive reviews for DJUBO, edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO offers 34 shared features plus 8 exclusive ones like multi-lingual support, POS, pricing intelligence, and guest feedback management. These features cater to hotels seeking a unified platform with advanced revenue and guest management tools.
innRoad, with 43 unique features plus 34 shared ones, provides extensive capabilities including website development, channel manager, automated reporting, and guest messaging. Its feature set supports independent hoteliers aiming for growth, especially with its booking engine, multi-currency support, and online checkout.
While innRoad’s larger feature list suggests more flexibility, DJUBO’s specialized features, especially in revenue and feedback management, give it an edge. However, if your hotel requires advanced website and channel management, innRoad’s broader suite offers more options.
DJUBO scores a high 4.76/5 for support, with recent reviews emphasizing its responsive, knowledgeable team and proactive upgrades. Users describe their support as “always available,” and praise the onboarding process.
InnRoad’s customer support rating is 4.48/5, with reviews highlighting its 24/7 live support and dedicated advisors. While support is generally excellent, some users mention occasional delays in resolution. Considering the more recent reviews and higher rating, edge: DJUBO.
innRoad’s integration count far exceeds DJUBO’s, with 34 verified partners versus DJUBO’s 3. Shared integrations include Tripadvisor, but innRoad connects to major platforms like QuickBooks, Revinate, and RateGain, offering extensive third-party options.
DJUBO’s limited integrations may restrict some workflows but could provide a more streamlined experience for those not heavily reliant on numerous third-party tools. If your hotel depends on a broad ecosystem of partners, innRoad’s extensive integrations make it the clear winner. Edge: innRoad.
DJUBO’s recent reviews show a perfect 5/5 rating, with users praising its ease of use, support, and value. Its higher NPS score (9.63/5) and recent positive feedback indicate strong satisfaction among users.
InnRoad’s ratings are slightly lower at 4.72/5, with reviews highlighting its usability and support but noting UI and performance areas for improvement. For hotel segments like boutique hotels and resorts, DJUBO’s recent reviews suggest higher overall satisfaction. Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO does not publicly disclose pricing, suggesting a custom quote based on your hotel’s size and needs. This approach often aligns with larger or multi-property hotels seeking extensive features.
innRoad charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no additional hidden costs, making it easier to budget for small to medium hotels. If predictable pricing matters, innRoad offers transparency, but DJUBO’s pricing is likely more flexible for larger enterprises.
Not ideal if your hotel operates primarily in regions where DJUBO has limited presence, or if you prioritize extensive third-party integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on legacy systems or requires a highly customizable in-house solution.
DJUBO delivers a unified, all-in-one management experience with a focus on control and guest feedback. Its strong recent reviews and user ratings demonstrate high satisfaction, especially among those seeking a comprehensive platform.
innRoad excels in channel management, integrations, and online booking capabilities, making it ideal for independent hotels prioritizing direct bookings and visibility. Its extensive feature set and support make it a compelling choice for hotels looking to grow and streamline operations.
If your hotel needs a single, easy-to-implement system with recent positive feedback, DJUBO is the safer bet. For properties that depend on wide integrations, online distribution, and flexible features, innRoad remains the preferred choice.
This comprehensive comparison should help your team decide which platform best suits your hotel’s operational goals and growth plans. Remember, recent reviews favor DJUBO’s high satisfaction scores, but innRoad’s extensive integrations make it attractive for specific needs.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然 Innroad 总体上是用户友好的,但 UI 和导航等某些方面可以更加直观。这些方面的改进将使新用户受益,并使日常操作更加高效。
Innroad 直观的预订管理系统简化了整个预订流程。它提供全面的数据访问,使员工能够高效地处理多房间预订和客人信息。
24/7 客户支持因其可用性和所提供帮助的质量而受到称赞。然而,一些用户报告称,偶尔会遇到沟通和解决速度方面的困难。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户提到频繁更新有时会降低系统性能,影响生产力。尽管更新带来好处,但建议更高效地推出并尽量减少干扰。
一些评论呼吁改进自定义报告功能。用户建议提供更详细、可自定义的报告选项,以便更深入地了解客户行为和运营指标。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Djubo 和 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Djubo 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad All-in-1 HMS 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Djubo 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Djubo:否。innRoad All-in-1 HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DJUBO 的 HT Score 为 0,innRoad 的为 27。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问