The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #31 3 条评价 | #27 13 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #43 0 条评价 | #19 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #25 0 条评价 | #15 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 2 条评价 | #21 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #31 2 条评价 | #34 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #39 0 条评价 | #33 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #31 0 条评价 | #28 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #33 0 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #12 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #10 3 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #16 0 条评价 | #11 2 条评价 |
Choosing between DJUBO and Noovy boils down to your hotel’s specific needs for management, integration, and scale. Both solutions aim to streamline hotel operations, but they differ significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. DJUBO offers a more extensive integration network and a broader feature set, while Noovy emphasizes simplicity and affordability.
Your team needs to decide whether comprehensive control or ease and value are more important. Which aligns better with your current priorities?
Both DJUBO and Noovy serve as all-in-one hotel management platforms designed to simplify operations and improve efficiency. DJUBO consolidates PMS, channel management, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and back-office functions under one roof, making it suitable for complex, multi-location operations. Noovy, on the other hand, offers a streamlined experience with core functionalities, focusing on user friendliness and automation.
In terms of recent reviews, DJUBO has more feedback—15 reviews in the last six months—making its data more current and reliable. Noovy has 21 reviews but none in the past six months, which slightly weakens the recency of its feedback. The more recent reviews favor DJUBO’s robustness, but Noovy maintains a high overall satisfaction rating.
Do you prefer a platform with a proven track record of recent updates and more extensive features? Or is a simpler, more affordable system appealing?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable, feature-rich system capable of managing multiple locations and complex operations, DJUBO is the clear choice. Its 42 shared and unique features—including guest feedback management and ancillary revenue tracking—support growth and operational control. It’s especially suitable if your hotel values detailed reporting and integration with legacy systems.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes ease of use, quick onboarding, and cost-effective automation, Noovy is better. Its focus on connectivity, automated payments, and user-friendly interface makes it ideal for small to mid-sized hotels, especially those looking for a straightforward, all-in-one solution at €£$5 per room per month.
Which profile fits your hotel’s size, complexity, and budget?
DJUBO boasts a user satisfaction score of 4.95/5, with many reviews highlighting its straightforward interface and easy onboarding process. Users appreciate the consistency of updates and the support team’s availability, making staff adoption smoother. However, some mention that the platform’s aesthetics may seem slightly dated, although an update is underway.
Noovy scores 4.62/5, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive design, quick setup, and seamless operation. Users frequently mention how fast and friendly the support team is, which enhances overall usability. The simplified interface and automation features are especially praised by smaller hotels.
Edge: DJUBO, due to its higher recent ratings and more positive feedback on onboarding.
DJUBO offers 42 core features, with 2 exclusive functionalities like guest feedback management and ancillary revenue tracking. Its comprehensive suite supports complex operations, multi-channel distribution, and detailed reporting, making it suitable for larger or multi-property hotels.
Noovy provides 40 shared features plus 10 unique functionalities, including guest CRM, online checkout, integrated payment terminals, drag-and-drop tapechart, GDPR compliance, and native email marketing. Its features focus on automation, connectivity, and ease of use, benefiting hotels seeking a straightforward solution.
Edge: DJUBO, because of its broader feature set and specialized functionalities tailored for complex operations.
DJUBO’s support ratings stand at 4.76/5, with reviews praising its quick, knowledgeable response and helpful onboarding. Users consistently mention how the support team resolves issues efficiently, improving overall satisfaction.
Noovy’s support scores 4.71/5, with reviewers describing the support as “friendly,” “reliable,” and “very good.” Though fewer recent reviews are available, the consensus remains positive, especially regarding prompt assistance and onboarding.
Edge: DJUBO, which has slightly higher recent support ratings and more detailed reviews.
DJUBO integrates with 3 verified partner systems, including TripAdvisor, Simplotel, and its own booking engine. Its limited integrations may restrict connectivity with some external systems or OTAs.
Noovy’s system boasts 40 verified partners, including Omnibees, SiteMinder, GuestRevu, and others, offering extensive connectivity across multiple OTAs, revenue management, and guest communication platforms. Its wide integration network allows for greater flexibility and scalability.
Edge: Noovy, with 40 verified integrations and broader connectivity options.
DJUBO has a perfect 5/5 rating in the most recent review cycle, with 15 reviews in the last six months, mostly from independent hotels and resorts. Hoteliers appreciate its technical reliability, real-time control, and ongoing upgrades.
Noovy also enjoys a 5/5 rating, but with all reviews being positive and more than half from boutique hotels and city center properties. Its high satisfaction score of 9.38/10 reflects strong user confidence, especially among small to mid-sized hotels.
Considering the recency of reviews, DJUBO’s ratings are more current and thus more indicative of recent performance.
Edge: DJUBO, due to its higher number of recent reviews and superior ratings.
DJUBO does not publish specific pricing details, but traditionally, it operates on a customized quote basis, often suited for larger or multi-property hotels. Its pricing reflects its broad feature set and extensive integrations.
Noovy charges a flat rate of $600 per month, covering all core functionalities, including PMS, channel management, booking engine, and automation tools. Its transparent pricing and affordability make it appealing to budget-conscious hoteliers.
Are you prepared for a potentially variable quote, or do you prefer a fixed, predictable monthly fee?
Hotels that should consider DJUBO:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that should consider Noovy:
Not ideal if:
DJUBO offers a comprehensive management platform with extensive features, integrations, and a proven track record of recent, positive reviews. Its broad functionality makes it suitable for larger or multi-location hotels that need detailed control and operational visibility.
Noovy excels in simplicity, affordability, and connectivity, making it ideal for smaller hotels that want quick setup and automation at a predictable monthly cost. Its user-friendly design is favored by boutique and city-center properties.
Choose DJUBO if your hotel requires complex operations, multiple integrations, and advanced analytics. Opt for Noovy if you want an easy-to-use, cost-effective system with strong OTA connectivity.
If your hotel values recent, detailed reviews and a wider integration network, Noovy’s recent feedback and extensive partner list make it the stronger choice. For hotels seeking a scalable, feature-rich platform with proven support, DJUBO delivers more comprehensive capabilities.
In conclusion, both platforms are excellent options depending on your hotel’s size, complexity, and budget. Prioritize what matters most—depth of features or ease of use—and your decision will be clearer.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
人们经常提到该软件的用户友好界面和对新员工的易于培训的特点,这使得它甚至适合那些技术背景较少的员工。
HotelConnect 与 Booking.com 和 Expedia 等 OTA 的直接连接被视为一大优势,简化了分销并消除了渠道经理成本。
用户非常欣赏 HotelConnect 将 PMS、渠道管理器、预订引擎、收入管理和客户沟通整合到一个平台,减少了对多个系统的需求并降低了成本。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
与收入管理相关的功能,包括详细的报告工具和费率日历,因有助于优化酒店收入而受到赞赏。
其中提到了一些翻译问题,特别是英语以外的语言,造成了一些不便。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Djubo 和 Noovy 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Djubo 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Noovy 提供 40 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Djubo 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Djubo:否。Noovy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DJUBO 的 HT Score 为 0,Noovy 的为 64。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问