Noovy vs. RMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 273 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 273 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Noovy 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Rate Shopping Module and Drag-n-Drop Tapechart.

RMS 表现出色 在 支持团队 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Noovy 与 RMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 273 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
64
87
推荐可能性
99%
86%
易用性
4.7/5
4.3/5
客户支持
4.8/5
4.5/5
性价比
4.8/5
4.2/5
起始价格 From $600/mo From $700/mo
经验证的评价 27 246

Noovy 与 RMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 273 条经验证的评价后,Noovy 用户最看重其 易于使用, 通道连通性, 一体化功能,而 RMS 用户则强调 支持团队, 用户界面, operational streamlining。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Noovy Noovy RMS RMS
优点
+ 易于使用
+ 支持团队
+ 通道连通性
+ 用户界面
+ 一体化功能
+ Operational Streamlining
+ 客户支持
+ OTA和渠道管理
缺点
收益管理
定制功能
翻译问题
报表定制
账单和发票

Noovy 对比 RMS:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Noovy Noovy RMS RMS
小型(10-24 间客房) #27 13 条评价 #6 124 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #19 11 条评价 #6 83 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #12 6 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #15 1 条评价 #2 7 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Noovy Noovy RMS RMS
精品酒店 #21 17 条评价 #6 79 条评价
豪华酒店 #34 2 条评价 #8 39 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #33 2 条评价 #7 38 条评价
长住酒店 #28 1 条评价 #5 52 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Noovy Noovy RMS RMS
北美 #9 56 条评价
欧洲 #12 25 条评价 #13 16 条评价
亚太 #11 6 条评价
中东 #11 2 条评价 #13 1 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right hotel management software can transform your operations and guest experiences. Both Noovy by Noovy and RMS by RMS aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in scale, features, and user feedback. Noovy offers a more modern, user-friendly approach with a smaller but recent review base, while RMS provides a comprehensive platform backed by a vast, global user base and extensive features. Which one truly fits your hotel’s needs?

Is Noovy or RMS Better for Hotels?

Noovy and RMS are both designed to cover core hotel management functions, but their focus and maturity diverge. Noovy emphasizes ease of use and connectivity, integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in a single platform, supported by a small but current review base. RMS, on the other hand, has a broader, more established set of features, including advanced revenue management, guest CRM, and online payments, with a massive review volume that reveals consistent satisfaction. Which aligns better with your operational priorities?

Noovy vs RMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-deploy system that reduces complexity while managing bookings and distribution, Noovy is your best choice. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, inns, and budget properties that value simplicity and connectivity without extensive customization. If you require a robust, feature-rich platform capable of handling multi-property operations, revenue optimization, and detailed guest insights, RMS is more suitable. It caters to larger, multi-property, or more complex operations seeking comprehensive automation.

Is Noovy or RMS Easier to Use?

Noovy scores a 4.62/5 in ease of use, reflecting its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and positive staff adoption. Customers praise its user-friendly design, stating that new employees can learn the system rapidly, and its online nature eliminates complicated installations. RMS has a slightly lower ease rating of 4.3/5, with some users mentioning software updates and occasional performance hiccups as challenges. Edge: Noovy.

Which Has Better Features: Noovy or RMS?

RMS offers 26 features exclusive to its platform, including a channel manager, revenue management modules, booking engine, guest CRM, online payments, and guest app, which Noovy lacks. Noovy provides two unique features: Rate Shopping Module and Drag-n-Drop Tapechart, but with fewer overall capabilities. RMS’s extensive feature set supports complex, multi-property management and revenue optimization, giving it a clear edge for larger operations. Edge: RMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Noovy or RMS?

Noovy’s customer support scores 4.71/5, with reviews highlighting its friendly, responsive, and effective assistance. Users frequently mention support as a key strength, noting quick resolution times and helpful interactions. RMS’s support scores 4.52/5, with reviews praising staff responsiveness but also noting occasional frustrations with software updates and system stability. Overall, Noovy’s recent reviews and higher rating suggest a slight advantage. Edge: Noovy.

Which Has More Integrations: Noovy or RMS?

RMS boasts 112 verified partners, nearly three times more than Noovy’s 40. Both share 18 integrations, including major players like SiteMinder, Revinate, and Shiji Group, but RMS’s larger network extends to additional partners like Criton, Sage, and STR, offering more flexibility. If a broad integration ecosystem is critical for your hotel, RMS’s extensive lineup provides greater options. Edge: RMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Noovy or RMS?

RMS is rated at 4.56/5 based on 214 recent reviews, with hotel segments like resorts, motels, and limited-service properties giving it high marks. Noovy, with only 21 reviews—none in the past six months—scores a perfect 5/5 but has less recent and less diverse feedback, limiting confidence in its current performance. Given the volume and freshness of RMS reviews, it is the more trusted option among hoteliers. Edge: RMS.

How Much Do Noovy and RMS Cost?

Noovy charges a flat fee of $600 per month, with no additional implementation or setup fees. RMS costs $700 per month, also without setup or implementation charges. Both offer transparent pricing models, but Noovy’s slightly lower price point may appeal to smaller hotels or those with tighter budgets.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Noovy?

  • Hotels that prioritize ease of use and quick deployment, such as boutique hotels, inns, and budget properties.
  • Teams that want an all-in-one platform for reservations, channel management, and basic revenue tools.
  • Hotels with limited IT staff seeking a cost-effective, cloud-based solution.
  • Hotels that value modern integration and automated payments.
  • Not ideal if your property needs advanced revenue management or multi-property features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RMS?

  • Hotels that operate multiple properties or large establishments requiring extensive automation.
  • Teams that need detailed revenue management, guest CRM, and online payment processing.
  • Hotels with complex booking needs, group management, and online check-in requirements.
  • Properties aiming for deep customization, extensive reporting, and comprehensive integrations.
  • Not ideal if your hotel is small, with simple needs, or prefers a less feature-heavy platform.

RMS vs Noovy: The Bottom Line for Hotels

RMS is a more established, feature-rich platform with a broader global presence, offering 26 unique functionalities tailored to larger or more complex properties. Noovy provides a simple, modern interface with essential management features, appealing to boutique and small hotels seeking ease of use and connectivity at a lower price point.

Choose Noovy if your hotel prioritizes fast onboarding, user-friendliness, and basic automation—especially if you’re a boutique or budget property. RMS is the better fit for larger hotels or chains that need extensive features, advanced revenue tools, and a proven, highly integrated platform.

If your hotel management needs are straightforward, Noovy’s recent positive reviews and ease of use make it a compelling choice. For more complex operations, RMS’s proven track record, extensive features, and robust ecosystem justify its higher price and wider adoption.

In conclusion, both platforms serve different hotel profiles well, but RMS’s larger review base and recent feedback make it the better option for hoteliers seeking proven reliability and advanced capabilities.

Noovy 和 RMS 的价格是多少?

酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Noovy Noovy RMS RMS
Starting Price From $600/mo From $700/mo

Noovy 有哪些 RMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Noovy 和 RMS 共享 48 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Noovy Noovy RMS RMS
EPoS
交付过程
拖放式磁带图
收益管理模块
综合 CRS
评分购物模块
预订引擎
频道管理员

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 16 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Noovy 对比 RMS(按业务目标)

我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
Noovy Noovy

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

RMS Lafayette Hotels 中型
+ Over $100K saved annually: eliminated server and IT maintenance costs by moving to RMS.
+ 60+ hours saved weekly: automated accounting and reporting replaced manual entries across the group.
+ 70%+ direct bookings: online direct bookings more than doubled in the four years since switching to RMS.

"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."

Ramsey Lafayette
Ramsey Lafayette
President
改善宾客体验
Noovy Noovy

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

RMS The Nare 小型
+ 30% of guests rebook before departure, with staff able to hold preferred rooms and follow up at just the right time.
+ 65% of bookings come from returning guests, with over 20% staying three or more times since 2017, proof that thoughtful personalization fueled by rich guest profiles turns great stays into lasting loyalty.
+ 25 years of guest history, and seven years of detailed booking history were successfully imported during RMS implementation in 2023, a key capability that preserved The Nare

"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."

Toby Ashworth
Toby Ashworth
Managing Director

Noovy 对比 RMS:总结

Noovy
Noovy
5.0/5 来自 27 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

易于使用 90% 正面

人们经常提到该软件的用户友好界面和对新员工的易于培训的特点,这使得它甚至适合那些技术背景较少的员工。

通道连通性 90% 正面

HotelConnect 与 Booking.com 和 Expedia 等 OTA 的直接连接被视为一大优势,简化了分销并消除了渠道经理成本。

一体化功能 88% 正面

用户非常欣赏 HotelConnect 将 PMS、渠道管理器、预订引擎、收入管理和客户沟通整合到一个平台,减少了对多个系统的需求并降低了成本。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

收益管理 43% 负面

与收入管理相关的功能,包括详细的报告工具和费率日历,因有助于优化酒店收入而受到赞赏。

翻译问题 100% 负面

其中提到了一些翻译问题,特别是英语以外的语言,造成了一些不便。

排名更高的方面

DE #8 vs #12
中东 #11 vs #13

独特功能

评分购物模块 拖放式磁带图
4.6/5 易用性 4.7/5 客户支持 40 个集成
查看资料
RMS
RMS
4.3/5 来自 246 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

支持团队 94% 正面

支持团队的响应速度和问题解决能力备受好评。客户高度赞赏他们积极主动地解决问题以及在系统操作方面提供的帮助。

用户界面 77% 正面

RMS Cloud 以其用户友好的界面而著称,简化了操作流程,缩短了员工培训时间。这种简化对于高效运营至关重要,尤其是在快节奏的工作环境中。

Operational Streamlining 75% 正面

RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users apprec... RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users appreciate its role in enabling real-time coordination among various departments, thereby enhancing efficiency and guest experience.

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

定制功能 43% 负面

许多用户称赞该平台的自定义功能,允许他们调整入住流程和其他操作,以更好地满足自身需求。然而,一些评论指出,自定义报告功能需要改进。

报表定制 100% 负面

尽管 RMS Cloud 提供多种报告,但用户反映报告自定义和访问某些设置方面存在困难。如果能改进这方面,就能简化生成可用于决策的实用信息的过程。

排名更高的方面

中型(25-74 间客房) #6 vs #19
小型(10-24 间客房) #6 vs #27
超大型(200+ 间客房) #2 vs #15
超小型(少于 10 间客房) #16 vs #33

独特功能

频道管理员 EPoS 收益管理模块 综合 CRS 交付过程
4.3/5 易用性 4.5/5 客户支持 112 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Noovy 5.0 vs 4.6 (+0.4)
易用性 Noovy 4.6 vs 4.3 (+0.3)
性价比 Noovy 4.7 vs 4.2 (+0.5)
入职培训 Noovy 4.5 vs 4.1 (+0.3)

关于 Noovy 与 RMS 的常见问题

Noovy 能否替代 RMS?

这取决于您的需求。Noovy 和 RMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Noovy 提供 40 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RMS 提供 112 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Noovy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Noovy 或 RMS 是否提供免费方案?

Noovy:否。RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Noovy 和 RMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Noovy 的 HT Score 为 64,RMS 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息