The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #31 3 条评价 | #15 32 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #43 0 条评价 | #22 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #25 0 条评价 | #20 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 2 条评价 | #16 29 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #31 2 条评价 | #15 18 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #39 0 条评价 | #17 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 0 条评价 | #13 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #33 0 条评价 | #19 6 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #15 10 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #10 3 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #16 0 条评价 | #8 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Djubo by DJUBO and Preno HMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and budget. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, recent user feedback, and market presence. Djubo offers a comprehensive all-in-one solution with a robust feature set and a longer review history, while Preno focuses on simplicity and ease of use, especially for smaller properties. Which fits your hotel's scale and goals better?
While Djubo has more reviews and a higher recent review count—indicating a more active user base and ongoing support—it also commands a higher price point. Preno’s affordability and user-friendly design make it appealing for small to mid-sized hotels, but it might lack some advanced features larger properties need. Are you ready to dive into a detailed comparison?
Both Djubo and Preno address core hotel management needs such as reservations, billing, and channel management, but they do so with different approaches. Djubo consolidates multiple functionalities into one platform, including revenue management, guest feedback, and a POS system, making it suitable for properties that require extensive operational control. Preno, on the other hand, emphasizes simplicity with an intuitive interface and essential features, appealing to hotels prioritizing ease of use.
Djubo’s extensive feature list—22 shared features plus 20 exclusive ones—offers more depth for complex operations, while Preno’s streamlined setup is often praised for quick onboarding. With Djubo’s broader regional presence and larger review volume (19 reviews in the last 6 months), it signals a more active and supported product, whereas Preno's reviews tend to be older or less frequent. Does your hotel need comprehensive control or straightforward management?
If your hotel needs a flexible platform capable of managing multi-currency transactions, guest feedback, revenue, and integrated CRS, Djubo is the clear choice. It suits independent hotels seeking extensive customization and operational insight, especially those with multiple locations. Djubo’s broad global presence and active support network make it ideal for hotels aiming for scalability.
Conversely, if your hotel values simplicity, quick setup, and reliable support, Preno is your best bet. It’s perfect for boutique hotels, bed & breakfasts, or motels that prefer an easy-to-learn system with essential channel management and booking features. Its lower price point ($600/month) and responsive customer service are significant advantages for smaller teams.
In summary, choose Djubo if your hotel demands a feature-rich, adaptable system with advanced revenue tools. Opt for Preno if your focus is on straightforward operations, quick staff onboarding, and cost efficiency.
Djubo’s user interface scores a 4.95/5 based on recent reviews, praised for its supportive onboarding process and mobile app. Users report that their staff find Djubo intuitive once familiarized but note that its extensive features can initially seem overwhelming. Djubo's onboarding is rated 4.83/5, indicating strong support during setup.
Preno slightly edges out in ease of use with a 4.86/5 rating, with reviewers emphasizing its simple, clean interface and quick learning curve. Support is rated at 4.69/5, and users appreciate how easily staff adapt to the system, especially those less tech-savvy.
Edge: Djubo.
Djubo offers a comprehensive suite of 42 features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, guest communication via SMS, automated reminders, integrated ID scanners, and a revenue management module—features absent in Preno. Its 20 exclusive features cater to larger, more complex operations needing detailed control.
Preno provides 29 features, focusing on core hotel management essentials like a drag-and-drop tapechart, native email marketing, guest CRM, and centralized user management. While it covers the basics well, it lacks advanced revenue tools and multi-lingual support.
Edge: Djubo.
Djubo’s customer support is highly rated at 4.76/5, with many reviews highlighting its responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Users say support is “always available” and “professional,” which is crucial during critical operational periods.
Preno’s support scores slightly lower at 4.69/5, with reviews praising their quick, reliable service. Customers mention that support staff are attentive and responsive, but some wish for more 24/7 availability.
Edge: Djubo.
Djubo features 3 verified partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, with integrations suited for multi-channel distribution. Its smaller partner network might limit options for certain third-party tools.
Preno integrates with 17 partners, including Xero, Bookboost, and RevControl, offering extensive options for accounting, marketing, and revenue management. Its broader network supports more seamless workflows with popular industry tools.
Edge: Preno.
Djubo’s recent reviews show a 96% likelihood of recommendation, with a 5/5 overall rating, driven by its feature depth and support. Hoteliers in larger properties or those with complex needs tend to favor Djubo’s extensive capabilities.
Preno’s 95% recommendation rate and 0/5 overall rating indicate consistent satisfaction, especially among boutique hotels and budget properties. Smaller properties appreciate its simplicity and customer service.
Edge: Djubo.
Djubo's pricing is not publicly listed, which suggests a customized quote based on hotel size and features. Its higher feature set and review volume indicate a potentially premium price point.
Preno charges $600 per month, with no free tier or trial available. Its transparent, lower-cost model appeals to smaller hotels or those with limited budgets.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Djubo presents a broad, feature-rich platform suitable for larger, multi-location hotels or those with complex operational demands. Its active review base, recent positive feedback, and extensive integrations underscore its maturity and support.
Preno is a lean, easy-to-learn system ideal for smaller properties or hotels prioritizing simplicity and quick setup. Its lower price and responsive support make it attractive for boutique hotels and budget-conscious teams.
If your hotel needs comprehensive control, advanced revenue tools, and a proven track record, Djubo is the clear choice. For straightforward, cost-efficient management, Preno remains a solid, user-friendly option.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno 的用户友好界面受到用户的高度赞扬。许多人注意到该系统的简单性和直观性,这大大降低了学习难度。这使得员工(即使是技术技能有限的员工)也能快速上手,... Preno 的用户友好界面受到用户的高度赞扬。许多人注意到该系统的简单性和直观性,这大大降低了学习难度。这使得员工(即使是技术技能有限的员工)也能快速上手,从而加快了运营速度。
客户普遍看重 Preno 的响应式客户支持,实时聊天和全面的帮助资源被强调是其一大优势。不过,一些评论提到需要更持续的全天候服务。
用户经常提到 Preno 的自动化功能,该功能简化了开票和报告等管理任务。这种自动化功能可节省大量时间并减少人工错误,使员工能够更加专注于客人体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管反馈积极,但用户指出仍有改进空间。建议的改进包括高级报告、更好的移动应用功能和增强的客户互动工具。这些更新被视为满足不断变化的行业需求的必要条件。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Djubo 和 Preno HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Djubo 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Preno HMS 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Djubo 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Djubo:否。Preno HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DJUBO 的 HT Score 为 0,Preno 的为 76。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问