The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #31 3 条评价 | #20 17 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #43 0 条评价 | #33 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #25 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 2 条评价 | #24 9 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #31 2 条评价 | #23 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #39 0 条评价 | #22 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #31 0 条评价 | #23 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #33 0 条评价 | #12 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #39 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #10 3 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #16 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between DJUBO and rezStream hinges on your hotel's unique needs and operational scale. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel management but diverge markedly in approach, features, and target markets. DJUBO presents itself as an all-in-one, enterprise-ready platform with a broad feature set, while rezStream caters primarily to small and independent hotels with a focus on reservation management and digital marketing. Your decision should consider which system aligns best with your operational complexity, growth plans, and budget.
Given recent reviews and the volume of feedback, rezStream's stronger market presence and higher review count make it the more reliable choice for current data insights. Are you ready to identify which platform fits your property best?
DJUBO offers a comprehensive cloud-based platform integrating PMS, channel management, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and back-office functions—aimed at larger or multi-property hotels seeking full control. rezStream, by contrast, specializes in small to medium-sized independent properties, focusing on reservation workflows, website services, and digital marketing to boost occupancy.
While DJUBO provides a unified solution that reduces disjointed systems, rezStream emphasizes ease of use and affordability for smaller teams. Do you need a robust, scalable system or a straightforward, budget-friendly solution?
If your hotel needs full operational control across multiple departments and locations, go with DJUBO. Its extensive feature count, including revenue management, rate shopping, and integrated ID scanners, suits larger operations or those planning expansion.
If your property is a small to medium-sized independent hotel, and you prioritize reservation management, marketing, and website integration, rezStream is the better fit. It’s praised for its user-friendly interface, affordability, and features designed for smaller teams, making it ideal for boutique inns and resorts.
Your choice should match your scale: for multi-location, revenue-focused hotels, DJUBO shines; for smaller properties, rezStream offers a streamlined experience.
DJUBO scores a 4.95/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, especially its mobile app, and supportive onboarding experience. Customers mention that staff quickly adopt the system, and the platform is perceived as supportive for daily operations.
rezStream is rated slightly lower at 4.81/5 but remains highly praised for its straightforward design and quick staff training, with reviewers calling it “easy to train staff on” and noting its “visual appeal.”
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO offers 34 shared features with its competitor, plus 8 exclusive ones like multi-lingual support, revenue management, rate shopping, direct billing, integrated ID scanners, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features are designed to support complex, multi-department hotel operations.
rezStream provides 34 shared features, along with 10 unique capabilities such as website development, guest CRM, online checkout, guest messaging, drag-and-drop tape chart, shift planning, and integrated payment terminals. Its features focus on simplifying reservation workflows and boosting online presence.
While both platforms are comparable in core functionalities, DJUBO’s additional revenue management and rate shopping modules give it an advantage for larger hotels seeking detailed control.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO maintains a high support rating of 4.76/5, with reviews emphasizing its supportive staff and consistent upgrades. Customers appreciate the professional training and availability of support, especially during onboarding.
rezStream edges slightly higher at 4.92/5, with reviews praising its “top-notch” support team, responsiveness, and ongoing platform updates. Users highlight the friendliness and expertise of support staff, especially for small properties needing quick answers.
Edge: rezStream.
DJUBO supports 3 verified partners, including TripAdvisor, Simplotel, and its native integrations, mainly focusing on major OTAs and booking channels. Its limited partner count suggests a more closed ecosystem but solid core integrations.
rezStream offers 5 verified partners, including Cloudbeds, Whistle, Stash Rewards, Akia, and CartStack, covering a broader range of marketing, booking, and payment integrations. This variety supports small properties seeking flexible, all-in-one solutions.
Edge: rezStream.
DJUBO’s overall rating is 5/5 based on 19 reviews, with 96% of users recommending it. Recent feedback often mentions its ease of use and technical reliability, though the review volume is smaller.
rezStream has a 0/5 rating from 26 reviews, but reviews are overwhelmingly positive, emphasizing ease of use, affordability, and excellent support. Its larger review base and recent feedback make its high ratings more indicative of current performance.
Given the volume and recency, rezStream’s higher rating and recommendation rate suggest it is better received among hoteliers today.
Edge: rezStream.
DJUBO does not publicly disclose its pricing, suggesting a tailored quote model based on property size and needs. No freemium or free trial options are available, which may be a barrier for smaller hotels.
rezStream charges a base price of $700 per month, with no free trial or freemium plan. Its transparent pricing makes it easier to budget, especially for smaller properties.
In summary, rezStream offers a clear, affordable entry point that suits small to medium hotels, while DJUBO’s customized pricing caters to larger operations.
DJUBO offers a broad, feature-rich platform designed to serve larger hotels and chains seeking comprehensive management. Its strengths lie in advanced revenue tools, multilingual support, and scalability, making it suitable for properties with complex operations.
rezStream excels in simplicity, affordability, and dedicated features for small independents, with high customer satisfaction and rapid onboarding. Its focus on reservation workflows, marketing, and guest communication makes it ideal for boutique hotels and small resorts.
For larger, multi-property hotels looking for an integrated, enterprise-level system, DJUBO's extensive capabilities and support are compelling. However, if your hotel is a small, independent operation prioritizing ease of use, customer support, and cost-efficiency, rezStream is the clear choice.
In conclusion, the decision rests on your property's size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both systems are capable, but recent reviews and customer feedback favor rezStream for its current performance and user satisfaction.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
RezStream 因其用户友好的界面而备受关注,它使员工培训和日常运营管理变得轻松高效。用户在多篇评论中都对这种易用性表示赞赏,凸显了该软件的直观性。
用户对 RezStream 乐于接受反馈和改进的做法表示赞赏,并定期实施有用的更新。这种响应能力确保该工具不断适应业务需求。
RezStream 提供与 OTA 和信用卡处理的重要集成,简化了操作并支持收入增长。用户对其提供的无缝操作集成表示赞赏。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对 RezStream 乐于接受反馈和改进的做法表示赞赏,并定期实施有用的更新。这种响应能力确保该工具不断适应业务需求。
一些用户指出了需要改进的地方,特别是在处理团体预订和修改预订方面,缺少某些自动化和库存跟踪功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Djubo 和 rezStream 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Djubo 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 rezStream 提供 5 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Djubo 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Djubo:否。rezStream:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DJUBO 的 HT Score 为 0,rezStream 的为 76。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问