The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 171 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
DJUBO 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Requests and Online Check-in.
Visual Matrix PMS 表现出色 在 technical support challenges 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Messaging and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
基于 HTR 上 171 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 19 | 152 |
在分析了 171 条经验证的评价后,DJUBO 用户最看重其 ,而 Visual Matrix PMS 用户则强调 technical support challenges, 用户友好的界面, comprehensive reporting tools。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好的界面
▾
|
|
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
|
−
系统速度和功能可用性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #31 3 条评价 | #18 23 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #43 0 条评价 | #2 117 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #25 0 条评价 | #16 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 2 条评价 | #12 38 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #31 2 条评价 | #16 17 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #39 0 条评价 | #1 124 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 0 条评价 | #4 44 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #33 0 条评价 | #7 141 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #32 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #10 3 条评价 | #18 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | #16 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right hotel management software can significantly impact your operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both DJUBO and Visual Matrix PMS aim to streamline your hotel’s daily tasks, but their approaches and strengths differ. DJUBO offers a comprehensive all-in-one platform that consolidates multiple functions, while Visual Matrix PMS specializes in operational efficiency with robust features and integrations. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
DJUBO is a cloud-based, all-in-one platform designed to unify your PMS, channel manager, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and back-office functions. It’s built for hotels seeking a centralized system that reduces reliance on multiple disconnected tools, delivering real-time control across operations. Visual Matrix PMS, on the other hand, focuses on optimizing core hotel tasks with an emphasis on automation, staff coordination, and seamless integrations, especially suitable for understaffed properties or those needing quick operational boosts.
The key divergence lies in their scope: DJUBO consolidates many functionalities into one system, while Visual Matrix PMS emphasizes operational speed and ease of use with extensive integrations. DJUBO, with a perfect overall rating of 5/5 and more recent active reviews, clearly demonstrates strong adoption and confidence among hoteliers. Visual Matrix PMS boasts a broader user base, particularly in branded hotels, with a 3.75/5 overall score based on more reviews and a more established presence.
Are you looking for an all-in-one solution that reduces complexity, or a specialized PMS that integrates well with existing tools? Your choice depends on your hotel’s scale, staff capacity, and operational priorities.
If your hotel needs a single platform to handle reservations, channel management, POS, revenue, and accounting, DJUBO is the better fit. Its broad feature set, including unique offerings like online check-in and payment requests, makes it appealing for independent hotels and multi-property groups seeking streamlined management.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes operational efficiency, staff automation, and extensive integrations with third-party systems, Visual Matrix PMS is ideal. Its focus on automation tools like housekeeping, shift planning, and guest messaging—paired with a large partner network—serves understaffed or tech-savvy properties well. For branded hotels looking for a flexible, well-supported platform, Visual Matrix often meets those needs better.
In summary, choose DJUBO when you need a comprehensive, all-in-one management suite. Opt for Visual Matrix PMS if your focus is operational automation, staff coordination, and extensive third-party integrations.
DJUBO scores a remarkable 4.95/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users highlight how quickly staff can adapt to DJUBO, citing the platform's simplicity despite its wide scope, and appreciate its user-friendly design across multiple modules. Training sessions are rated highly, reducing the learning curve for new team members.
Visual Matrix PMS also earns a strong 4.43/5 in usability, with many users citing its familiar interface and ease of navigation. However, some mention that system speed issues and feature bloat can hamper workflows, especially during peak times. Support and onboarding are generally rated well, but the speed limitations are a common concern among users.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO offers 42 features, including unique capabilities like online check-in and payment requests, not available in Visual Matrix PMS. These features support guest self-service and streamlined payments, which are increasingly important in modern hospitality.
Visual Matrix PMS boasts 40 shared features, with 15 additional exclusive functionalities like guest messaging, integrated payment terminals, drag-and-drop tape charts, and guest CRM. Its automation tools, such as shift planning and GDPR compliance, enhance operational control and staff management.
While both systems are rich in features, DJUBO’s unique offerings around payments and check-in give it a slight edge for properties focused on guest experience. Visual Matrix PMS’s automation and extensive integrations make it a strong choice for operational efficiency.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO is rated 4.76/5 for customer support, with reviews emphasizing its supportive staff and ongoing upgrades. One reviewer highlighted, “The support team is always available and very professional,” reflecting its strong reputation for responsiveness.
Visual Matrix PMS has a support rating of 4.34/5, with users appreciating knowledgeable tech support and helpful weekly tips. Some reviewers mention occasional difficulties in reaching support quickly during critical moments, but overall, support is considered reliable.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO features 3 verified integration partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, but its ecosystem is relatively limited. This might restrict your ability to connect with specialized third-party tools if your hotel requires extensive custom integrations.
Visual Matrix PMS offers 23 verified partners, including Hotel Investor Apps, SiteMinder, SkyTouch, and LaaSie.ai. Its broader ecosystem allows more flexible connections with booking engines, POS systems, and revenue tools, making it suitable for hotels with complex tech stacks.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
DJUBO has a higher review count (19 reviews), with an outstanding overall rating of 5/5 and a 96% likelihood to recommend. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, comprehensive features, and excellent support, especially in the last six months.
Visual Matrix PMS, with 143 reviews and a 3.75/5 rating, has a more extensive history of user feedback. Its recent reviews highlight its operational strengths but also point to speed issues and some missing functionalities. Its higher review volume suggests a mature product with steady user experience.
Considering recency and scores, DJUBO’s reviews lend it a significant edge for current hotelier confidence.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO does not publicly list specific pricing, indicating a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. It operates on a subscription model without a free tier or trial, making its cost structure less transparent upfront.
Visual Matrix PMS charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no free trial or tier, and no mention of additional costs. Pricing appears straightforward but may be prohibitive for smaller properties or those seeking flexible plans.
In absence of clear, comparable data, your best bet is to request quotes directly from vendors to assess value based on your hotel’s requirements.
Not ideal if you require extensive third-party integrations or highly specialized billing features. Smaller boutique hotels might find DJUBO’s comprehensive approach too broad or costly.
Not ideal if speed and system responsiveness are critical during peak times or if your property relies heavily on advanced billing functionalities absent in the platform.
DJUBO stands out as a highly rated, all-in-one platform with a perfect review score and recent positive feedback. It suits independent hotels and multi-property groups that want unified control over their operations without juggling multiple tools.
Visual Matrix PMS excels in operational automation, extensive integrations, and support for understaffed hotels. Its broad feature set and established presence make it ideal for branded hotels and properties seeking a flexible, automation-driven system.
If simplicity, ease of use, and comprehensive functionality are your priorities, DJUBO is the clear choice. If your focus is on operational efficiency, automation, and extensive third-party connections, Visual Matrix PMS will serve you better.
For most hotels actively evaluating these options today, DJUBO’s more recent reviews and higher satisfaction ratings position it as the more reliable and scalable solution.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Djubo 和 Visual Matrix PMS 共享 40 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款请求 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 5 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
Visual Matrix 的直观设计降低了学习难度,方便新员工使用。然而,一些用户提到,从其他系统过渡到 Visual Matrix 初期会遇到一些困难。
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Djubo 和 Visual Matrix PMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Djubo 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Visual Matrix PMS 提供 23 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Djubo 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Djubo:否。Visual Matrix PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DJUBO 的 HT Score 为 0,Visual Matrix PMS 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问