The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 151 条经验证的评价后,DJUBO 用户最看重其 ,而 Exely 用户则强调 channel manager integration and synchronization, 用户界面和可用性, 支持与响应。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Channel Manager Integration and Synchronization
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
支持与响应
▾
|
|
|
+
直接预订增强
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
分析与报告
▾
|
|
|
−
自定义和控制
▾
|
|
|
−
集成灵活性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #20 7 条评价 | #15 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #34 0 条评价 | #9 51 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #22 0 条评价 | #7 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #27 3 条评价 | #15 29 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #25 4 条评价 | #13 27 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #37 0 条评价 | #15 14 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 0 条评价 | #14 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #34 0 条评价 | #18 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #19 10 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 7 条评价 | #5 67 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #21 1 条评价 | #7 13 条评价 |
Choosing between DJUBO and Exely as your hotel’s channel management solution hinges on your specific operational needs and growth ambitions. DJUBO offers a comprehensive, all-in-one platform with extensive features and a proven track record among diverse property types, especially in Asia and Africa. Exely, on the other hand, excels in ease of use and real-time synchronization, with a clear focus on streamlining online distribution. Which product aligns better with your current priorities?
Both products aim to simplify distribution and increase revenue, but they diverge significantly in scope. DJUBO’s broad feature set supports large, complex operations, while Exely’s lightweight design favors quick setup and day-to-day efficiency. Are you ready for a feature-rich platform or a straightforward, user-friendly solution?
DJUBO and Exely address the core challenge of managing multiple online channels and reducing overbooking risks, but their approaches differ. DJUBO’s platform consolidates PMS, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and more into a single system, providing deep control and customization. Exely focuses on rapid, real-time updates across channels with minimal manual effort, emphasizing simplicity and speed.
DJUBO’s users praise its extensive feature list—26 exclusive features including advanced revenue management and guest feedback modules—making it ideal for multi-property hotels or groups needing detailed control. Conversely, Exely’s standout is its intuitive interface and effortless synchronization, favored by hotels prioritizing fast deployment and operational efficiency.
Are you seeking a platform that covers every operational aspect or one that offers rapid, reliable distribution with less complexity?
If your hotel needs a fully integrated management system that combines reservations, PMS, POS, revenue, and guest feedback, DJUBO is the clear choice. Its broad feature set and modular structure suit multi-property owners and hotel groups that require robust analytics and extensive customization. For properties that prioritize control over numerous operational areas and prefer a single dashboard, DJUBO’s strengths are evident.
If your goal is to optimize online room sales with minimal fuss and focus primarily on channel synchronization, Exely is the better fit. Its streamlined interface and quick updates across multiple OTAs make it ideal for independent hotels or boutique properties that want to boost direct bookings and avoid overbooking issues without needing a full PMS.
For scalability and comprehensive control, choose DJUBO; for simplicity and speed, go with Exely.
DJUBO’s onboarding experience scores 4.74/5, and reviews commend its intuitive interface, especially for managing complex multi-property operations. Users highlight its ease of understanding despite the broad functionality, making staff adoption smoother over time.
Exely’s ease of use is slightly higher at 4.95/5, with reviews emphasizing its user-friendly design, straightforward setup, and quick training. Hotels say it significantly reduces manual work and simplifies daily operations, even for staff new to channel management.
Edge: Exely.
DJUBO offers 26 features exclusive to its platform, including PMS, booking engine, POS, revenue management, guest feedback, and multi-lingual support, making it a true all-in-one solution. It provides extensive customization, reporting dashboards, and integrations with RMS and metasearch platforms.
Exely, by comparison, provides a focused set of features centered on channel management and synchronization, with no unique modules beyond its core channel optimization tools. Its strength lies in real-time updates and automated reporting rather than a broad feature suite.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO’s support ratings are high at 4.78/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially post-sale. Customers appreciate their proactive approach and clear communication, which has contributed to a 96% likelihood to recommend.
Exely scores slightly higher at 4.95/5, with reviewers describing their support team as consistently helpful and responsive. Feedback indicates a partnership approach, with users feeling confident in platform stability and ongoing updates.
Edge: Exely.
DJUBO supports 3 verified partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, with integrations mainly focused on regional markets like Asia Pacific, Africa, and the Middle East. Its ecosystem is smaller but stable for those regions.
Exely offers 8 verified integrations, including Oracle Hospitality, Booking.com, and Mews, covering a broader geographic range, including North America and Europe. It caters to larger, more diverse hotel chains with varied technology stacks.
Edge: Exely.
DJUBO has 18 reviews, with the majority within the last 6 months, reflecting recent positive feedback and a 4.75/5 overall rating. Hoteliers in Asia and Africa rate it highly for its feature set, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness.
Exely has 102 reviews, mostly older, with a current rating of 0/5, indicating a lack of recent feedback. Its early reviews are positive for usability and automation, but the absence of recent data makes it less reliable as a current choice.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO does not publicly disclose its pricing, implying it offers customized quotes based on property size and needs. It operates on a subscription model without free tiers or trial info.
Exely charges a flat rate of $100 per month, with no free trial or tiered options. Pricing is transparent but may be less flexible for larger chains or those requiring more extensive integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel only needs basic channel management without additional modules or a PMS.
Not ideal if your hotel needs an integrated PMS or advanced guest management features.
DJUBO stands out as a comprehensive hospitality platform, especially suited for larger, multi-property hotels that need extensive control, analytics, and operational features. Its broad feature set and modular design make it a long-term scalable solution.
Exely excels in delivering a straightforward, reliable channel management experience with real-time synchronization, ideal for hotels emphasizing online distribution and quick wins. Its simplicity and support make it a preferred choice for smaller hotels or those new to digital distribution.
Choose DJUBO if your hotel demands a broad, integrated management system; opt for Exely if your focus is on efficient, error-free online distribution. Both are capable, but your specific needs will determine the best fit.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
The robust integration and synchronization abilities of Exely facilitate smooth channel management with minimal errors. Users commend how effectively... The robust integration and synchronization abilities of Exely facilitate smooth channel management with minimal errors. Users commend how effectively it connects with PMS and OTAs, though some desire improvements in certain PMS integrations.
Exely 的用户友好界面是其一大优势,方便酒店员工管理日常运营。然而,部分用户建议进一步进行定制和现代化改造,以提升用户体验。
Exely 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而备受赞誉,从而确保了服务的可靠性。然而,一些用户建议在高峰时段响应速度可以更快一些。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Exely 提供了重要的绩效洞察,但用户表示需要更详细、可定制的报告选项,以便更好地分析渠道有效性并推动战略决策。
尽管 Exely 为预订规则和促销活动提供了高级自定义选项,但一些用户希望网站模板和报告格式能有更灵活的设计选项。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Djubo (Instaconnekt) 和 Exely Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Djubo (Instaconnekt) 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Channel Manager 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Djubo (Instaconnekt):否。Exely Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DJUBO 的 HT Score 为 0,Exely 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问