项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 264 条经验证的评价后,DJUBO 用户最看重其 渠道管理与ota同步, 易用性 / 直观界面, 支持与服务响应速度,而 Exely 用户则强调 易用性与日常运营, 渠道管理与多渠道ota分销, 支持质量与响应速度。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
渠道管理与OTA同步
▾
|
+
易用性与日常运营
▾
|
|
+
易用性 / 直观界面
▾
|
+
渠道管理与多渠道OTA分销
▾
|
|
+
支持与服务响应速度
▾
|
+
支持质量与响应速度
▾
|
|
+
可靠性 / 正常运行时间 / 最小错误率
▾
|
+
直接预订和网站转化
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制化与功能增强
▾
|
−
报告与分析深度
▾
|
|
−
预订引擎的性能和功能
▾
|
−
界面、导航和速度问题
▾
|
|
−
移动应用 / 移动控制
▾
|
−
PMS 和第三方集成
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #16 19 条评价 | #7 78 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #35 0 条评价 | #6 90 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 51 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #24 0 条评价 | #6 9 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #24 8 条评价 | #6 79 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #26 5 条评价 | #9 52 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #32 1 条评价 | #6 39 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #34 0 条评价 | #9 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #34 0 条评价 | #14 3 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #43 0 条评价 | #15 19 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #8 19 条评价 | #5 183 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #15 1 条评价 | #5 32 条评价 |
DJUBO and Exely Channel Manager serve distinct hotel types through their differing scopes and market presence. DJUBO offers a comprehensive all-in-one platform integrating PMS, channel management, booking engine, POS, and revenue management, targeting hotels needing an integrated operations suite. Exely focuses exclusively on channel management with rapid OTA synchronization across 570+ channels and strong direct booking tools, aimed at hotels prioritizing distribution efficiency and revenue control.
Both solve the core problem of OTA inventory and rate synchronization but diverge operationally. DJUBO centralizes multiple hotel functions in a single system, reducing the need for multiple software licenses and training, while Exely excels in distribution scale and speed, minimizing overbooking risk. Hotels needing a broad operational platform will lean toward DJUBO, while those seeking extensive OTA coverage and nimble channel control will prefer Exely.
If you operate a multi-department hotel or a group requiring integrated PMS, POS, and revenue management alongside channel management, DJUBO fits best, supported by its 24 unique features beyond channel management and 2,300+ hotels across 21 countries. This is reinforced by DJUBO’s focus in Asia Pacific, Africa, and the Middle East, where these features are often critical.
If your property is in a region spanning North America to Europe or requires quick synchronization across hundreds of OTAs, Exely outperforms. Exely’s 10 verified integrations and 570+ OTA connections facilitate centralized rate and availability management, reducing overbooking to under 1%. Its recent growth—121 reviews in the last six months averaging 4.9/5—reflects a strong presence in diverse hotel segments from boutique to luxury and branded hotels.
For smaller independent hotels in markets DJUBO serves, its all-in-one solution supports operational breadth, but properties focusing on maximizing direct bookings via distribution control should prioritize Exely’s channel management specialization. Segment data is limited for properties under 10 rooms for both, so definitive recommendations for micro properties cannot be made.
DJUBO and Exely both earn very high ease-of-use ratings: 4.8/5 for DJUBO across 22 reviews, and 4.9/5 for Exely across 242 reviews. Reviewers praise DJUBO’s user-friendly interface and ease of adoption for new staff, citing reduced training time. Exely users highlight intuitive navigation and quick loading that smooth daily distribution management.
Neither product shows a significant edge in ease of use or onboarding, with onboarding scores of 4.7/5 for DJUBO and 4.9/5 for Exely, both reflecting positive user experiences. Reviewers for both platforms report minimal operational friction when training front desk and revenue teams.
Edge: Even.
DJUBO offers 24 unique features absent from Exely, including a full Property Management System, Point of Sale, Booking Engine, Revenue Management, Pricing Intelligence, Housekeeping, Guest Feedback Management, and multi-property management. These features impact operations by consolidating front desk tasks, F&B billing, housekeeping coordination, guest communications, and revenue optimization in one interface, reducing the need for multiple vendor contracts and interfaces.
Exely provides no unique features beyond the shared 15 common channel management capabilities but excels in OTA connectivity volume (570+ OTAs) and speed of update synchronization (under 7 seconds), which directly reduces overbooking risk and manual workload in distribution teams.
For hotels needing an integrated operational platform covering reservations through back-office finance, DJUBO’s feature set is clearly superior. Exely’s strength is in high-volume, rapid channel distribution rather than operational breadth.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO scores 4.8/5 on customer support and onboarding across 22 reviews, while Exely scores 4.9/5 across 242 reviews. Both products receive praise for responsive, helpful support that reduces operational downtime. DJUBO reviewers note live support availability and fast query resolution. Exely users emphasize proactive service and expert assistance with rate settings and troubleshooting.
The difference in support ratings is marginal, with no review volume suggesting a meaningful advantage. Both teams assist with implementation and ongoing optimization effectively.
Edge: Even.
Exely leads with 10 verified integrations, including major PMS providers like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Hotelogix, plus revenue management systems like IDeaS. These integrations enable seamless data flow between distribution, property management, and revenue teams, critical for mid-sized to large hotels managing complex operations.
DJUBO has 3 verified partners — Tripadvisor, Simplotel, and its own platform — reflecting a narrower integration ecosystem, consistent with its all-in-one design philosophy that reduces the need for third-party connections.
Hotels relying on third-party PMS or RMS will favor Exely’s broader connectivity. Properties using DJUBO’s built-in PMS and revenue management modules may not require extensive integrations.
Edge: Exely.
Both products receive near-identical overall ratings: DJUBO at 4.8/5 from 22 reviews, Exely at 4.9/5 from 242 reviews. Exely’s volume and recency (121 reviews in the last 6 months rated 4.9/5) provide stronger evidence that current user satisfaction is very high. DJUBO lacks recent reviews, with zero in the last six months, limiting confidence in current user sentiment.
Segment ratings for DJUBO range from 4.7 to 5/5 with smaller review counts per segment (5-11). Exely has 4.9/5 or higher across multiple segments with 16 to 81 reviews each, including boutique hotels (81 reviews), airport hotels (58), and branded hotels (40), demonstrating broad appeal.
Edge: Even.
DJUBO does not publish pricing details, including base price, monthly fees, or implementation costs, nor does it offer a trial, complicating upfront cost assessment.
Exely publishes a base price of $100.00, with no additional implementation fees or freemium option. Pricing is not per room or flat monthly; further details require vendor contact.
Without comparable published pricing, no price edge can be assigned.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
DJUBO and Exely address the fundamental challenge of channel management but diverge sharply in scope and scale. DJUBO’s comprehensive hospitality management suite integrates front desk, POS, revenue, and channel management under one roof, serving properties seeking operational consolidation and multi-property control primarily in Asia Pacific and emerging markets. Exely specializes in expansive OTA distribution with rapid synchronization, broad integrative connectivity, and features supporting direct booking growth, targeting global hotels focused on maximizing distribution efficiency.
Choose DJUBO if your hotel or group requires a unified platform that reduces reliance on multiple vendors, supports multi-currency and multi-lingual operations, and benefits from unlimited channel distribution without added costs. Its 24 unique operational features and positive reviews for integrated workflows make it the clear choice for hotels valuing operational breadth.
Choose Exely if your hotel demands fast, reliable, and scalable channel management across hundreds of OTAs, with strong PMS and RMS integration, automated alerts to minimize overbooking, and tools designed to increase direct bookings and revenue. Exely’s proven success in diverse markets, supported by 242 reviews including 121 in the last six months at 4.9/5, confirms its role as the preferred specialized channel manager for hotels prioritizing distribution performance.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
费率管理
|
|
|
| 支持每周和每月费率 | ||
| 收益规则 | ||
| 派生费率 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 库存网格 | ||
|
▾
房间类型映射
|
|
|
| 通道自映射 | ||
|
▾
自动化与同步
|
|
|
| 批量更新和多重限制 | ||
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
|
▾
管理和设置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多币种支持 | ||
| 库存网格 | ||
| 综合支付处理 | ||
|
▾
分析和报告
|
|
|
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 预订绩效和进度报告 | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) |
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before Exely, we could not get enough flexibility or functionality we needed. We couldn’t manage dynamic pricing or promotions properly, now the system provides us all the tools t..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
核心优势是实时保持各OTA平台的房态和预订同步。评论者表示,这简化了分销流程,减少了人工操作,有助于避免多个酒店和渠道间的运营错误。
用户多次表示Djubo易于学习和操作,即使是新员工也能快速上手。简洁的布局减少了培训时间,使繁忙团队的日常酒店运营更加轻松。
酒店普遍提到在出现问题时能够获得快速且个性化的支持。多位评价者表示,服务团队积极主动且可靠,以至于他们很少需要求助,因为系统通常运行顺畅。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户认可供应商愿意协助定制化,但他们也希望新功能和酒店特定变更能更快上线。反复提出的需求是一个更灵活的平台,能够快速适应不断变化的酒店需求。
预订引擎被视为促进直接预订和支持折扣及套餐等优惠的有用工具。然而,一些用户表示其在速度、设计和可用性方面需要改进,表明该领域仍有提升空间,以更好地将需... 预订引擎被视为促进直接预订和支持折扣及套餐等优惠的有用工具。然而,一些用户表示其在速度、设计和可用性方面需要改进,表明该领域仍有提升空间,以更好地将需求转化为收入。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
酒店反复描述Exely界面直观、操作简便、适合日常管理。系统被认为能减少手工工作、加快预订处理流程,并让员工更容易管理预订、价格和房态。
评测者常将Exely描述为一个强大的渠道管理平台,能够从一个界面控制多个OTA渠道。他们重视集中管理分销、随着时间增加更多渠道,以及减少单独登录每个OTA的复杂... 评测者常将Exely描述为一个强大的渠道管理平台,能够从一个界面控制多个OTA渠道。他们重视集中管理分销、随着时间增加更多渠道,以及减少单独登录每个OTA的复杂性。
支持是Exely最受赞赏的方面之一,评论者反复提到其响应迅速、帮助及时且积极主动。酒店重视团队在安装、故障排除、优化甚至商业建议方面的协助,这降低了运营阻... 支持是Exely最受赞赏的方面之一,评论者反复提到其响应迅速、帮助及时且积极主动。酒店重视团队在安装、故障排除、优化甚至商业建议方面的协助,这降低了运营阻力。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
反复的批评是,Exely 的报告与分析需要更详细、更灵活、响应更快。评审希望有更清晰的仪表盘、更好的收入/渠道对比、更多可定制的报告,以及更丰富的预订趋势洞... 反复的批评是,Exely 的报告与分析需要更详细、更灵活、响应更快。评审希望有更清晰的仪表盘、更好的收入/渠道对比、更多可定制的报告,以及更丰富的预订趋势洞察,以支持收入和市场决策。
虽然许多用户觉得Exely易于使用,但也有人指出导航、页面加载速度和界面清晰度有待改进。最常见的反馈是某些操作流程需要点击太多次、部分页面加载缓慢,以及高... 虽然许多用户觉得Exely易于使用,但也有人指出导航、页面加载速度和界面清晰度有待改进。最常见的反馈是某些操作流程需要点击太多次、部分页面加载缓慢,以及高级设置不够直观。
排名更高的方面
这取决于您的需求。Djubo (Instaconnekt) 和 Exely Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Djubo (Instaconnekt) 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Channel Manager 提供 10 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Exely Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Djubo (Instaconnekt):否。Exely Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。DJUBO 的 HT Score 为 0,Exely 的为 92。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐