The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | EdenRed |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #3 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | EdenRed |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 25 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | EdenRed |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 51 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #3 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #2 1 条评价 |
Choosing a payment processing solution for your hotel isn't just about transaction speed; it’s about reliability, ease of use, and integration with your existing systems. With EdenRed’s DP Pay offering no recent reviews and a score of zero, it’s difficult to assess its current performance or support. Conversely, Zil Money’s platform boasts 54 recent reviews, a high NPS score, and a clear reputation for ease of use and extensive features. Based on recent data, Zil Money is the more dependable choice.
Both EdenRed’s DP Pay and Zil Money aim to facilitate hotel payments but approach the task differently. EdenRed offers a supposedly comprehensive payment system, yet it has zero reviews in the last six months and an overall rating of zero, leaving real hotel experiences unverified. Zil Money, on the other hand, has accumulated 54 recent reviews, a high NPS score of 8.57, and a 4.5/5 ease of use rating, demonstrating active engagement and proven satisfaction.
While EdenRed’s lack of recent reviews raises questions about ongoing support and product development, Zil Money’s steady stream of hotel feedback indicates a platform that’s actively used and refined. If your hotel values current user experiences and reliable support, Zil Money’s platform offers a more trustworthy option today.
If your hotel needs a flexible, multi-feature financial management platform capable of handling complex payment types, Zil Money is the clear choice. Its suite of 15 features—including recurring payments, multi-currency settlements, contactless payments, and PayPal acceptance—outpaces EdenRed, which offers no documented features.
For hotels seeking a straightforward, secure payment gateway with robust support, Zil Money’s high customer satisfaction and recent reviews make it preferable. EdenRed’s lack of positive, recent feedback makes it unsuitable for hotels prioritizing reliability and ongoing support.
Ease of use is one of Zil Money’s standout qualities, with a 4.5/5 user rating based on recent reviews. Hotels report its interface as intuitive and straightforward, reducing onboarding time and simplifying daily operations. Reviewers mention that setup is quick, and staff adopt it without significant hurdles.
EdenRed’s UI and onboarding experience are unverified due to the absence of recent reviews, making it impossible to assess. Given the current data, Zil Money clearly has the edge in usability, making it the more accessible choice for hotel teams.
Zil Money boasts 15 unique features, including pay-by-link, recurring payments, contactless transactions, Apple Pay, Google Pay, PayPal, and partial capture—features that EdenRed does not list or appear to offer. EdenRed’s feature set remains unknown, with no documented capabilities, which severely limits its appeal.
If your hotel needs a versatile, feature-rich payment platform, Zil Money’s extensive options provide more operational flexibility. EdenRed’s limited feature scope makes it less suitable for hotels seeking advanced payment functionalities.
Zil Money’s customer support scores 4.5/5 based on recent reviews, with users describing its support as responsive and helpful. Review quotes note satisfaction with onboarding and ongoing assistance, crucial for hotel teams navigating new payment systems.
EdenRed has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to evaluate its support quality. Given Zil Money’s proven support performance, it’s clearly the better choice for hotels that prioritize reliable assistance.
Zil Money has no verified integrations but offers an API, which allows for customization and connection with other systems. EdenRed similarly has no verified partners or integrations documented, limiting its integration options.
Without concrete partnerships or integrations, neither product excels in connectivity. However, Zil Money’s API readiness offers potential for tailored integrations, providing some flexibility for hotels with complex systems.
With zero recent reviews and a score of zero, EdenRed’s platform has no recent hotel feedback to evaluate. Zil Money’s 54 reviews yield a 62.92 score on the HTR platform, with an 87% likelihood to recommend, and many hotel users praise its ease of use and transaction speed.
Hotels favor Zil Money across segments, especially those valuing straightforward, reliable payment solutions. EdenRed’s lack of recent reviews means it cannot be rated, but based on current data, Zil Money is the preferred platform.
EdenRed does not list pricing, and with no recent reviews or customer feedback, its cost structure remains unknown. Zil Money charges a $400 base price, with no mention of ongoing monthly fees, making its pricing transparent and predictable.
For hotels seeking clear, upfront costs, Zil Money’s pricing is straightforward. EdenRed’s unclear pricing model discourages budget planning and comparison.
EdenRed may be suitable for small, simple payment needs in environments with minimal complexity, but its lack of recent validation makes it a risky choice.
Zil Money suits hotels that value operational flexibility, recent positive reviews, and scalable features.
The core difference between the two is that EdenRed offers an unverified, unsupported solution, while Zil Money provides a well-reviewed, actively used platform. Zil Money’s extensive feature set, high user satisfaction, and recent reviews make it the clear option for hotels needing dependable payment processing today.
Choose EdenRed only if your hotel has minimal needs, no requirement for advanced features, and is willing to accept the risk of unsupported or unverified service. For most hotels, Zil Money delivers a flexible, trusted, and comprehensively reviewed solution that supports operational growth.
If you want a payment platform that’s proven and supported by recent hotel reviews, Zil Money is the recommended choice. EdenRed’s absence of recent validation suggests it should be avoided unless specific circumstances favor its use.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 Zil Money 的直观界面,简化了发票、费用跟踪和其他财务任务。该平台的易用性缩短了入门时间并提高了运营效率。
一些评论表明,客户体验的一些细微改进,例如简化验证流程和减少设置时间,可以使平台更加高效和用户友好。
许多用户强调了 Zil Money 支付处理功能的速度和可靠性,这确保了及时交易并支持酒店的现金流管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户看重Zil Money与各种会计和财务软件无缝集成的能力,这有助于整合财务运营并提高效率。
用户建议扩大与更多第三方应用程序的集成,这将提供更多的灵活性和定制性,满足不同的业务需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。DP Pay 和 Zil Money 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。DP Pay 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zil Money 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Zil Money 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
DP Pay:否。Zil Money:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。EdenRed 的 HT Score 为 0,Zil Money 的为 63。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问