The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 3 条评价 | #3 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #3 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 1 条评价 | #3 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 2 条评价 | #3 25 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 3 条评价 | #3 51 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #3 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #2 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right payment software for your hotel depends on your specific operational needs, budget, and integration requirements. Folio Pay by Folio and Zil Money both aim to streamline payments, but their approaches, features, and market presence differ significantly. Folio Pay, with only 3 recent reviews, has a very limited user base but offers a modern, integrated platform focused on accounts payable automation. Zil Money, with 54 reviews, provides a broader set of features, including multiple payment options and extensive third-party integrations.
Your team must consider whether you prioritize a single, modern platform or a more feature-rich, flexible solution. Which one better fits your hotel's size, complexity, and strategic goals?
Folio Pay is designed specifically for hospitality, integrating procurement and accounts payable processes into a unified platform. It emphasizes automated rebates, real-time visibility, and control over supplier payments, benefiting hotels seeking to optimize vendor relations and cash flow management. Zil Money, on the other hand, offers a wide array of payment options, including international payments, virtual cards, and contactless methods, making it more suitable for hotels with diverse payment needs or multiple entities.
Folio Pay’s limited review count (3 reviews) and recent reviews make it difficult to gauge widespread satisfaction, while Zil Money’s larger, more recent review base suggests more reliable user feedback. Do you need a specialized hotel payment solution or a versatile financial management platform?
Edge: Zil Money
If your hotel needs a streamlined accounts payable system that integrates procurement and offers rebates to improve cash flow, go with Folio Pay. Its core strengths lie in supplier management, automated payments, and visibility, making it ideal for larger hotels or chains prioritizing operational efficiency.
If, however, your hotel requires a broad set of payment functionalities—such as international payments, virtual cards, or multi-currency support—and values extensive third-party integrations, Zil Money is the better choice. Its flexibility and comprehensive features appeal to hotels with complex financial workflows or multiple locations.
In summary, choose Folio Pay if operational automation and procurement integration are your top priorities; opt for Zil Money if payment versatility and extensive customization matter more.
Edge: Zil Money
Folio Pay scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward payment workflows. Onboarding appears smooth, and the limited reviews suggest users find the platform easy to adopt, although navigation improvements could help.
Zil Money, with a 4.5/5 rating, also emphasizes user-friendliness. Its platform is praised for clarity, though some reviewers note minor setup complexities, possibly due to its broader feature set. Both are accessible, but Folio Pay’s smaller scope might make adoption slightly quicker.
Edge: Folio Pay
Folio Pay offers no exclusive features beyond its core accounts payable automation and rebate management. Its focus on supplier payments, virtual accounts, and invoice matching provides streamlined control but lacks the breadth of other payment options.
Zil Money boasts 15 unique features, including pay-by-link, contactless payments, multiple international payment methods, virtual cards, and payment splitting. These capabilities enable your hotel to handle a wide variety of transactions and currencies, offering greater flexibility.
For feature depth and diversity, Zil Money has the edge.
Edge: Zil Money
Folio Pay’s support ratings are perfect at 5/5, with all three recent reviews describing their onboarding and support as excellent. Users emphasize quick, helpful responses and smooth integration, making it suitable for hotels that prioritize reliable support.
Zil Money scores 4.5/5, with many users appreciating support but some citing slower response times. While generally positive, its support may not match the immediacy or focus of Folio Pay’s team.
Edge: Folio Pay
Neither Folio Pay nor Zil Money currently boasts verified integrations, with zero partners listed for both. Zil Money’s API availability suggests the potential for custom integrations, but its current ecosystem remains limited.
Given the lack of verified third-party integrations, neither holds a clear advantage. However, Zil Money’s broader feature set may require more extensive integrations in the future to maximize value.
Edge: Draw
Folio Pay has only 3 reviews, all recent, with a perfect likelihood to recommend (100%), but the small sample size limits confidence. Its users praise its simplicity and effectiveness, especially for procurement.
Zil Money, with 54 reviews, has a high overall rating (average 62.92 on the HT Score), and 87% of users would recommend it. Hotel segments such as luxury hotels and branded properties rate it positively for flexibility and ease of use.
Given the larger, more recent review base, Zil Money’s user satisfaction is more reliably established.
Edge: Zil Money
Folio Pay does not publicly list pricing, which suggests a tailored quote approach, typical for enterprise solutions. Zil Money charges a flat fee of $400, with no mention of additional charges, but its pricing may vary depending on features or usage.
Your hotel should contact Folio Pay for a custom quote, while Zil Money’s transparent $400 fee provides clarity, especially for smaller or budget-conscious hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel needs broad payment options, international currencies, or extensive third-party integrations. Small boutique hotels or those with diverse payment needs might find Folio Pay too narrow.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, single-purpose accounts payable solution or has minimal need for international or varied payment options. Hotels with basic payment workflows might find Zil Money overly complex.
Folio Pay centers around automating supplier payments, offering vendor rebates, and controlling accounts payable processes. It’s a focused, modern platform best suited for larger hotels or chains that want integrated procurement and payables.
Zil Money provides a broad array of payment features, including international options and virtual cards, with extensive third-party support. Its flexibility makes it ideal for hotels with complex financial workflows and multi-location operations.
For operational automation, especially procurement, Folio Pay is the clear choice. For versatile payment needs and international capabilities, Zil Money is more suitable.
In conclusion, if your hotel values tight integration, rebate opportunities, and streamlined supplier payments, go with Folio Pay. If you need a comprehensive, flexible platform with extensive payment methods and international support, Zil Money is the better fit.
Edge: Zil Money
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 Zil Money 的直观界面,简化了发票、费用跟踪和其他财务任务。该平台的易用性缩短了入门时间并提高了运营效率。
一些评论表明,客户体验的一些细微改进,例如简化验证流程和减少设置时间,可以使平台更加高效和用户友好。
许多用户强调了 Zil Money 支付处理功能的速度和可靠性,这确保了及时交易并支持酒店的现金流管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户看重Zil Money与各种会计和财务软件无缝集成的能力,这有助于整合财务运营并提高效率。
用户建议扩大与更多第三方应用程序的集成,这将提供更多的灵活性和定制性,满足不同的业务需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Folio Pay 和 Zil Money 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Folio Pay 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zil Money 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Folio Pay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Folio Pay:否。Zil Money:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Folio 的 HT Score 为 0,Zil Money 的为 63。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问