项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店无钥匙门禁系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 91 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 52 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 13 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 11 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 50 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 30 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 16 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 20 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 45 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #3 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Duve Wallet Keys and Goki hinges on your hotel’s digital access needs. Both solve the core problem of contactless, keyless entry, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Duve offers a more limited feature set but focuses on app-free, mobile wallet-based access. Goki, on the other hand, provides a broad array of management tools, hardware options, and integrations, making it a more versatile choice.
While Duve emphasizes simplicity and contactless entry via digital wallets, Goki offers a comprehensive platform that supports both hardware and software, making it suitable for a wider range of property types. Are you prioritizing ease of use or operational flexibility?
Duve Wallet Keys primarily targets hotels seeking a streamlined, contactless guest experience without requiring guests to download an app. It integrates directly into your digital check-in process, allowing guests to add their room key to Apple Wallet or Google Wallet and unlock doors by tapping their phone. Its automation simplifies credential management, automatically updating access throughout the stay.
Goki excels in properties that need more than just access control—offering tools like guest messaging, remote management, and multi-property oversight. It also supports a variety of hardware options and integrates with over 20 PMS systems, making it a flexible choice for busy hotels or hostels with diverse operational needs.
The key difference: Duve’s focus is on a contactless, app-free entry experience, while Goki targets comprehensive access management and guest engagement. Which aligns better with your property’s operational goals?
If your hotel needs a simple, digital wallet-based key system that minimizes physical key handling, Duve is the safer choice. Its contactless approach reduces front desk workload and appeals to tech-savvy guests who prefer not downloading apps.
If you require a broader management platform with integrated guest messaging, remote access control, multi-property oversight, and extensive hardware options, Goki is the clear winner. It supports a variety of use cases, from hostels to boutique hotels, and boasts a higher review count (155 reviews vs Duve’s zero) and recent feedback.
For properties emphasizing secure, app-free access with minimal infrastructure, Duve fits. For those seeking operational efficiency and multi-functionality, Goki is the superior pick.
Goki’s user experience scores are notably higher—4.79/5 for ease of use, supported by a review count of 155 reviews. User feedback highlights its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and reliable hardware, with comments like "Support are top notch" and "Locks are well made and easy to use."
Duve, with a 0/5 ease-of-use rating and no recent reviews, offers limited insight. Its focus on digital wallet credentials simplifies the entry process but may not be as straightforward for staff or less tech-savvy guests.
Edge: Goki.
Goki offers 12 unique features including guest management dashboards, notifications, multi-property management, remote check-in, and app-based door hardware. These capabilities enable hotels to operate more efficiently and enhance guest engagement.
Duve provides a single core feature: Wallet Keys, which enable app-free mobile room access via Apple and Google Wallet. While simple, it lacks the broader operational tools Goki delivers.
In terms of feature count and functionality, Goki stands out with a more versatile, comprehensive platform.
Edge: Goki.
Goki's reviews demonstrate a high level of support, with an average rating of 4.75/5 and comments like "Support are top notch" and "Support are very responsive." Users appreciate its quick response times and ongoing assistance, which is crucial for hardware-based systems.
Duve, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 customer support rating, offers no reliable support data. Its limited feature set suggests less need for ongoing support, but this could also reflect a less active user community.
Edge: Goki.
Duve integrates with 70 verified partners, including leading PMS systems like Opera, Mews, Cloudbeds, and RoomRaccoon. Its extensive integration network allows seamless operational workflows across different property management platforms.
Goki connects with 22 verified partners, including major PMSs like RMS, Cloudbeds, and Shiji Group. While fewer in number, Goki’s integrations are solid but less expansive than Duve’s.
In terms of sheer number, Duve’s integrations are more comprehensive, offering broader compatibility.
Edge: Duve.
Goki’s recent reviews reflect an overall rating of 4.2/5 from 155 reviews, with a 9.5/10 NPS score. Hoteliers in hostels, boutique hotels, and small resorts praise its ease of use, support, and operational efficiency.
Duve, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, lacks sufficient recent feedback. Goki’s more active user base and recent positive reviews make it the more trusted product in today’s market.
Edge: Goki.
Duve’s pricing details are not publicly available; it likely offers custom quotes or enterprise pricing. Goki has a clear base price of $400, with no ongoing subscription fees, making it straightforward and predictable for budgeting.
If cost transparency is critical, Goki’s clear pricing provides an advantage. Duve’s custom pricing may be a barrier if budget clarity is a priority.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced guest messaging, multi-property management, or extensive hardware options.
Not ideal if your hotel only needs a simple, app-free entry solution without management features.
Goki’s strength lies in its broad capabilities—integrations, management tools, and hardware options—that support diverse hotel types. Its high review count and recent positive feedback make it a reliable choice for properties seeking operational efficiency.
Duve offers a streamlined, app-free access experience via digital wallets, ideal for properties prioritizing guest convenience and minimal infrastructure. Its limited feature set and lack of recent reviews position it as a niche solution rather than a comprehensive platform.
If your hotel values a full-featured, versatile access control ecosystem, Goki is the clear choice. For simple, contactless room entry with minimal setup, Duve may suffice.
In conclusion, for hotels looking for a reliable, well-supported system with extensive features and proven market presence, Goki delivers the better value. If your focus is solely on a contactless, app-free guest entry experience, Duve’s Wallet Keys can meet that need, but its limited support and recent feedback raise concerns about long-term reliability.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want our competitive advantage to be our Efficiency, we seek to differentiate ourselves from the positioning of traditional hostels that run manual operations and define our ide..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"THE BLUE was one of the first fully digital hotels in Australia and with goki having the integration to our preferred PMS it was a no brainer to give it a go. With a contactless an..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Goki的无钥匙入住系统因其便捷的使用体验和无需实体钥匙而提升安全性而备受赞誉。宾客赞赏其带来的便利,酒店经营者则强调该系统有助于简化入住流程并提高运营效... Goki的无钥匙入住系统因其便捷的使用体验和无需实体钥匙而提升安全性而备受赞誉。宾客赞赏其带来的便利,酒店经营者则强调该系统有助于简化入住流程并提高运营效率。
评论者讨论了远程管理客房访问权限的价值,这可以灵活安排客人的抵达时间,并减轻前台的工作量,对于员工有限或不提供 24 小时服务的酒店来说尤其有利。
集成的消息功能使酒店能够高效地与客人沟通,快速解决客人的疑问或偏好,从而提升客人的体验。该功能尤其因其在告知客人活动或问题方面的透明度而备受赞誉。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一些评测者提到Goki系统存在连接问题,例如网络中断时会出现故障。这些中断会影响系统的效能,表明其离线功能还有提升空间。
虽然 Goki 的支持团队通常都能及时响应,但一些用户注意到沟通存在延迟,特别是那些与 Goki 支持团队存在较大时区差异的用户。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Duve Wallet Keys 和 Goki 共享许多核心 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Duve Wallet Keys 提供 71 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Goki 提供 22 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Duve Wallet Keys 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Duve Wallet Keys:否。Goki:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Duve 的 HT Score 为 0,Goki 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐