The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Spa & Wellness Module and Integrated CRS.
Infor 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 47 |
在分析了 47 条经验证的评价后,Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) 用户最看重其 ,而 Infor 用户则强调 易于使用, 报告, 一体化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
报告
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化
▾
|
|
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持
▾
|
|
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #44 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #25 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #24 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #28 24 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 26 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #31 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #22 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #24 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
Both Engisoft by Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) and Infor HMS aim to simplify hotel management tasks through cloud-based property management systems. They promise to streamline reservations, billing, and housekeeping, but they diverge sharply in maturity, features, and user feedback. With Infor's more extensive market presence and recent reviews, it’s clear which solution is more relevant for today’s hoteliers. But which one truly fits your hotel’s needs?
Engisoft, developed in 1992, offers a cloud PMS tailored to property managers seeking a straightforward, scalable tool. Yet, with zero reviews in the last six months—indicating limited recent user data—its real-world performance remains unclear. Conversely, Infor, established in 1999 and boasting 46 recent reviews, is a well-established platform with a 4.04 out of 5 rating, making it easier to assess its current effectiveness.
While Engisoft claims to provide an intuitive interface and robust reporting, the absence of recent customer feedback means you can't confirm its ongoing reliability or support quality. Infor, on the other hand, has an active user base with consistent praise for its features and support, though some users report issues during updates. The real question is: which system aligns better with your hotel’s operational demands today?
If your hotel needs a basic, scalable PMS to manage reservations, billing, and housekeeping with a focus on Europe, Engisoft might seem appealing, especially given its long history. However, with no recent reviews or active customer feedback, its ongoing support and usability are uncertain.
If you require a mature, feature-rich PMS with extensive integrations, customizable reports, and proven support in multiple regions—including North America, Europe, and Asia—Infor is the clear choice. Its 46 recent reviews, with a 74% likelihood to recommend, demonstrate consistent, real-world satisfaction and ongoing product evolution.
For hotels prioritizing a system with recent user validation, Infor is the stronger option. If you are in a niche European market seeking a flexible, less proven solution, consider Engisoft—but proceed cautiously.
Based on the latest reviews, Infor HMS scores a 3.88 out of 5 for ease of use, with users describing the system as "generally intuitive" despite some glitches. Support during onboarding is rated a 3.64, with users appreciating responsive assistance that eases the learning curve.
Engisoft’s UI and onboarding experience are unverified due to the lack of recent reviews, but its 0/5 rating for ease of use indicates significant uncertainty about its user-friendliness. Given the active feedback on Infor’s usability and support, it’s the safer bet for hotels seeking a straightforward, manageable system.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Engisoft offers 14 shared features with Infor but uniquely provides five additional functionalities: Spa & Wellness Module, Integrated CRS, Gift Vouchers, Digital Registration, and an Integrated ID & Passport Scanner. These features are tailored for properties with niche needs like wellness centers or digital check-ins.
In contrast, Infor boasts 20 features, including guest profiles, direct billing, multi-currency support, and ancillary revenue tracking—features critical for larger or multi-property hotels. Its extensive integrations with platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, and proprietary modules for revenue and work order management give it a comprehensive edge.
Given the feature count and recent reviews emphasizing its versatility, Infor’s broad set of tools makes it more suitable for hotels with complex operational needs. Edge: Infor HMS.
Customer reviews reveal Engisoft offers no recent feedback, leaving its support quality uncertain. Its long-standing presence suggests some level of service, but without recent reviews, its responsiveness and effectiveness are unverified.
Infor, however, scores a 4.04 out of 5 for customer support, with reviews highlighting prompt, professional assistance. Users mention that support teams guide them through issues efficiently, especially during onboarding and updates, which are common pain points.
Given the active and positive recent feedback, Infor’s support team is clearly more reliable. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor’s 113 verified partners include major platforms like SiteMinder, Onity, and Trevo, offering extensive connectivity. Its shared integrations with Engisoft include HiJiffy and eRevMax, but Infor’s wider partner network provides greater flexibility for complex tech stacks.
Engisoft, with only 8 verified partners, covers basic hotel tech needs but lacks the breadth of Infor’s ecosystem. For hotels that depend on multiple third-party integrations, Infor’s larger partner network is a significant advantage.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Since Engisoft has no recent reviews, it cannot be rated by current users, making Infor the clear leader. Infor’s recent 46 reviews give it a 4.04/5 overall rating, with users praising its scalability, customization, and support.
Segment-specific ratings show independent hotels rate Infor at 4.18/5, and branded hotels at 4.5/5. Hotels with more complex operational needs or multiple properties tend to rate Infor higher for its flexibility and integration.
Given the recency and volume of reviews, Infor is the better-rated choice. Edge: Infor HMS.
Both Engisoft and Infor do not disclose explicit pricing models, indicating a likely custom quote-based approach. Typically, such systems involve setup fees, licensing, and ongoing support costs, which vary widely based on hotel size and needs.
However, the absence of transparent pricing means you need to contact each vendor directly for a quote. Considering Infor’s larger footprint and proven support, it may come at a premium but offers clearer value in return.
Not ideal if...
Not ideal if...
The core difference lies in their maturity and feature sets. Infor offers a proven, feature-rich platform with recent, positive reviews, making it suitable for larger, multi-property hotels or those with complex operations.
Choose Engisoft if you prioritize a niche solution with digital check-in and wellness modules, especially in Europe, and are willing to accept less recent user feedback. However, for most hotels today, Infor’s ongoing support, extensive integrations, and recent validation make it the clearer choice.
If your hotel values a system with active reviews and broad functionality, Infor is the recommended option. But if your focus is on a smaller-scale, niche property, Engisoft might suffice—though proceed carefully given limited recent data.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Engisoft 和 Infor HMS 共享 14 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Engisoft 和 Infor HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Engisoft 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor HMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Engisoft:否。Infor HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) 的 HT Score 为 0,Infor 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问