The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 816 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Yanolja Cloud Solution 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (3.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 On premise.
基于 HTR 上 816 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 816 |
在分析了 816 条经验证的评价后,Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) 用户最看重其 ,而 Yanolja Cloud Solution 用户则强调 易于使用且界面友好, 可靠性和效率提升, integration and real-time synchronization。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面友好
▾
|
|
|
+
可靠性和效率提升
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and real-time synchronization
▾
|
|
|
+
POS系统性能
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析功能增强
▾
|
|
|
−
高级功能请求
▾
|
|
|
−
移动应用性能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 492 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 174 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 14 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #37 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 264 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 416 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #5 131 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #5 41 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #16 45 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #26 16 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #1 635 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #3 15 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. ENGISOFT’s Engisoft Cloud PMS and Yanolja’s Property Management System both aim to streamline daily tasks, but they do so with differing strengths. ENGISOFT offers an extensive feature set tailored for large or complex properties, whereas Yanolja provides a user-friendly, highly rated platform with broad regional reach. Which system aligns best with your hotel's needs?
Both products aim to simplify reservations, billing, and housekeeping, but their approaches differ sharply. ENGISOFT focuses on in-depth operational modules and integrations, while Yanolja emphasizes ease of use, reliability, and wide market presence. Do you prioritize comprehensive features or a more accessible, well-supported platform?
ENGISOFT and Yanolja address core PMS needs—reservation management, billing, and housekeeping—but their capabilities diverge. ENGISOFT provides 19 unique features, including a revenue management module, integrated CRS, and housekeeper management, making it suitable for hotels with complex operational needs. Conversely, Yanolja’s system offers only one exclusive feature—on-premise deployment—but excels in real-time integration with channel managers and POS systems, reducing manual work.
Yanolja’s recent review data shows a high customer satisfaction rate with a 4.25/5 rating and over 662 reviews, compared to ENGISOFT’s lack of recent reviews and a star rating of 0/5. This indicates broader market validation and ongoing support for Yanolja. Are you comfortable choosing a less-reviewed, niche solution like ENGISOFT, or do you prefer a more proven, widely adopted platform like Yanolja?
If your hotel needs an easy-to-use, reliable system with strong support and broad regional coverage, Yanolja is the clear choice. Its 4.77/5 ease-of-use rating and 4.79/5 customer support score reflect high staff adoption and user satisfaction, especially among smaller, mid-sized, and regional hotels. The recent reviews highlight its seamless integration, operational efficiency, and dedicated support team.
If your property requires extensive customization, advanced reporting, and modules like revenue management or online support, ENGISOFT might appeal. However, with no recent reviews and a score of zero, its market validation is weak. For most hotels seeking stability and support, Yanolja’s extensive user base and high ratings make it the more dependable option.
Yanolja shines in usability, with a 4.77/5 ease-of-use score based on user reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick staff onboarding, and straightforward workflows. Customers mention that new staff can adapt rapidly, often within days, thanks to its simple design and comprehensive tutorials. Onboarding reviews consistently reflect high satisfaction, with one user noting, “The staff learned and trained themselves by watching tutorials—it was not complicated at all.”
ENGISOFT, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating, indicating poor or unreviewed usability. The lack of recent feedback suggests limited customer engagement or support, making it difficult to assess. Based on available data, Edge: Yanolja.
ENGISOFT offers 19 features, including a spa & wellness module, revenue management, integrated CRS, online support, and mobile app. These features cater to larger properties with complex needs, offering in-depth control over operations, guest CRM, and digital registration. Its extensive feature set signifies a highly customizable system suited for properties demanding detailed operational tools.
Yanolja provides only one exclusive feature—on-premise deployment—but integrates seamlessly with channel managers, POS, and booking engines, streamlining operations for smaller or mid-sized hotels. While its feature count is lower, the emphasis on integration and ease of use often outweighs the lack of niche modules. Edge: ENGISOFT for feature breadth, especially for complex operations.
Yanolja’s customer support is rated 4.79/5, with recent reviews highlighting its dedicated team and prompt assistance. Users mention that support staff are helpful and that onboarding is smooth, with one review stating, “They really make you comfortable with the software and help you perform better.” This consistent high support rating indicates a reliable support system across regions.
ENGISOFT’s support score is 0/5, reflecting either a lack of recent reviews or limited support availability. Without recent feedback, it’s difficult to verify support quality. Based on current data, Edge: Yanolja.
Yanolja boasts 157 verified integration partners, including Xero, QuickBooks, SiteMinder, and RevControl, offering extensive connectivity options. Shared partners like HiJiffy and Onity indicate solid integration with popular third-party systems, simplifying operational workflows.
ENGISOFT has 8 verified partners, including Lybra Tech, Mirai, and eRevMax, but its smaller partner ecosystem limits integration options. For hotels prioritizing a broad array of system connections, Yanolja’s network is clearly superior. Edge: Yanolja.
Yanolja’s recent reviews show an average rating of 4.25/5, with a high likelihood to recommend at 96%. Hotel segments like independent hotels and resorts rate it highly, often praising its ease of use and reliability. The most recent reviews reinforce its reputation as a dependable, well-supported platform.
ENGISOFT has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge customer sentiment. The lack of recent positive feedback suggests limited ongoing customer engagement or validation. Based on available data, Edge: Yanolja.
Yanolja’s system costs $100 per month, with no additional implementation fees. Its transparent pricing model appeals to hotels seeking predictable expenses.
ENGISOFT does not disclose a clear price point or trial options, indicating either a custom quote process or less transparent pricing. This lack of upfront cost transparency makes Yanolja the clearer, more accessible option for budget-conscious hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, regionally focused, or prioritizes ease of use over extensive features.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive custom modules or has complex operational workflows requiring extensive in-depth features.
Yanolja offers a simple, reliable, and well-supported PMS with high user ratings and broad market presence. Its focus on ease of use and seamless integrations makes it ideal for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency and staff adoption.
ENGISOFT provides a feature-rich solution tailored for larger or highly complex properties, but its lack of recent reviews and support data make it a riskier choice. If your hotel needs extensive modules and customization, ENGISOFT may fit, but for most mid-sized or regional properties, Yanolja is the safer, proven pick.
In conclusion, if your hotel values proven support, quick onboarding, and broad integration, Yanolja is the clear recommendation. For properties with complex needs and a focus on extensive features, ENGISOFT might be suitable—though less validated in the current market.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Engisoft 和 Yanolja Property Management System 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 自定义费率 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了该系统的用户友好型设计,这使得新员工能够轻松上手,快速掌握使用方法。直观的界面简化了日常操作,尤其是在预订和计费流程方面。
Yanolja 因其可靠性而备受赞誉,用户称赞其系统稳健可靠,能够提升部门效率和准确性。该平台在简化前台和收益管理方面的支持尤其受到重视。
Users praise Yanolja for its seamless integration of PMS, Channel Manager, POS, and Booking Engine, enabling efficient operations through real-time up... Users praise Yanolja for its seamless integration of PMS, Channel Manager, POS, and Booking Engine, enabling efficient operations through real-time updates that prevent overbookings and ensure inventory accuracy. The integration notably simplifies reservation handling and outlet billing.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统在运行效率方面表现出色,但用户经常要求提供更高级的报告选项和可自定义的仪表板,以便更好地监控性能并支持决策过程。
用户期待某些高级功能,例如 WhatsApp 发票和更深入的 CRM 集成,能够进一步增强与客户的沟通和运营效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Engisoft 和 Yanolja Property Management System 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Engisoft 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Yanolja Property Management System 提供 157 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Yanolja Property Management System 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Engisoft:否。Yanolja Property Management System:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) 的 HT Score 为 0,Yanolja Cloud Solution 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案