The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Stay247 |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #17 21 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #8 59 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 35 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #10 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Stay247 |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 52 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #7 55 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #7 35 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #8 18 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Stay247 |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #9 17 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 40 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 14 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 42 条评价 | — |
Choosing between RateTiger Channel Manager by eRevMax and Stay247 Channel Management hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to optimize distribution, but their approaches, features, and market presence differ significantly.
RateTiger, part of eRevMax, has established itself as a leader in the channel management space with a vast network, highly rated support, and extensive features. Stay247, a newer entrant, offers basic synchronization capabilities but lacks the same breadth of integrations and market penetration. So, which aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
RateTiger excels at providing a comprehensive, globally recognized platform with real-time two-way connectivity to over 400 OTAs, GDS, and other channels. Its user reviews highlight its reliability, with a 4.7/5 overall rating driven by 115 reviews, making it the most reviewed option by far.
Stay247, however, has no recent reviews or ratings, which calls into question its current market presence and reliability. Its lack of verified partnerships and absence of user feedback make it difficult to gauge its performance or suitability for your hotel.
If you prioritize proven performance, broad connectivity, and a track record of customer satisfaction, RateTiger is clearly the stronger choice. Do you need a platform backed by a large user community and extensive real-world validation?
If your hotel needs a mature, well-supported channel management solution with proven ROI, go with RateTiger. Its robust features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, and multi-currency support, make it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels and chains.
If your hotel is small or just starting to explore online distribution and you prefer a simple, low-cost solution, Stay247 could be considered. However, with no recent reviews or verified integrations, it’s best to be cautious about its ability to support your growth.
For hotels seeking proven reliability and extensive market reach, RateTiger is the clear choice. Conversely, if you’re looking for a basic, untested platform, Stay247 may fit temporarily, but it lacks the credibility of RateTiger.
RateTiger’s user reviews rate its ease of use at 4.39/5, with many users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. However, some note that its outdated interface and occasional lag in meta connectivity can hinder efficiency, especially for new users.
Stay247, with no available reviews, provides no data on usability or onboarding experience. Its lack of feedback makes it impossible to assess how user-friendly or intuitive the platform is.
Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger offers an extensive feature set with 10 unique functionalities including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, multi-currency support, and unlimited channel integrations. It also supports bulk updates, derived rates, and role management, making it a versatile tool for larger hotels.
Stay247 lacks detailed feature information or any unique capabilities. It appears to offer basic synchronization, but without additional features or a clear roadmap, it falls short of RateTiger’s comprehensive offering.
Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger’s support team receives a high rating of 4.61/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, efficiency, and helpfulness. Customers mention that issues are resolved promptly, with some expressing satisfaction with the training and ongoing assistance.
Stay247 has no available customer support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to evaluate the level of service or responsiveness.
Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger boasts 70 verified partners, including major players like Booking.com, Expedia, Agoda, Google, Airbnb, and others, ensuring a wide reach across global markets. Its extensive integrations support a variety of PMS, RMS, and booking engines, offering flexibility for different hotel setups.
Stay247 has no confirmed integrations or verified partners, limiting its ability to connect with essential distribution channels. This significantly restricts its usefulness for hotels that rely on multiple platforms.
Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger’s reviews, totaling 115 recent reviews, consistently rate the platform at 4.7/5, with hoteliers praising its reliability, connectivity, and support. Hotels of various segments, including boutique and city-center properties, find it highly effective, with some noting a 37% reservation increase attributed to its use.
Stay247, with no reviews or ratings, offers no data on user satisfaction or hotel segment preferences. Without feedback, it’s impossible to determine whether hoteliers find it valuable.
Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger does not publicly disclose pricing, but its subscription models are typically based on a monthly fee per room and require a setup fee—common in enterprise solutions. Its ROI is often justified by increased revenue and operational efficiencies.
Stay247 provides no pricing information or subscription details, making it difficult to evaluate its value proposition or compare costs directly.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
RateTiger stands out as a mature, feature-rich platform with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and high user ratings. Its emphasis on reliability, support, and global presence makes it suitable for mid-sized to large hotels and hotel chains.
Stay247, however, lacks recent reviews, verified integrations, and detailed features. It might serve small, simple operations temporarily but falls short for hotels with complex or expanding distribution needs.
If your hotel values proven performance, comprehensive features, and strong support, go with RateTiger. If you are exploring basic distribution for a small property and are willing to accept unknowns, Stay247 might be an option, but with caution.
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"With RateTiger, we have managed to take our occupancy to 90%. Their 2-way integration between our PMS and multiple global and regional OTAs has ensured that we sell on the proper c..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We are working with RateTiger for the last 2 years. When I saw the features and functionalities of RateTiger Channel Manager, I was really impressed. RateTiger Channel Manager help..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
尽管该产品的支持团队总体上收到了积极的反馈,但一些用户建议进行改进,以更快地解决问题并提供一致的可用性。
eRevMax 的预订引擎和渠道管理器之间的整合通过简化预订流程提高了运营效率。
在所有 OTA 上保持价格平价被认为是一项显著的好处,确保客人无论在哪个预订平台上都能看到一致的价格,从而提高信任度并可能提高入住率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
评论中提到了诸如同步问题和可用性更新失败等反复出现的技术问题,但用户承认支持人员能够迅速处理此类情况。
全面的报告和分析工具因提供有关预订趋势的宝贵见解而受到称赞,使酒店能够做出数据驱动的决策,以最大化收入并优化策略。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) 和 Stay247 Channel Management 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) 提供 70 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stay247 Channel Management 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax):否。Stay247 Channel Management:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eRevMax 的 HT Score 为 67,Stay247 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问