The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 66 条评价 | #32 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 21 条评价 | #30 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 5 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | #38 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 42 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #9 24 条评价 | #31 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 25 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #6 21 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 194 条评价 | #23 4 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #25 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #20 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right channel manager can dramatically impact your hotel’s visibility, bookings, and operational efficiency. Both eviivo Suite™ CM and Seekda Channel Manager are designed to connect your property with multiple OTAs, but they differ significantly in user base, recent reviews, and feature depth. Your decision should hinge on your property type, regional focus, and support preferences. So, which solution aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
eviivo Suite™ CM boasts a high rating of 85.37 on the HotelTechReport (HTR) Score, backed by 231 reviews, most recent in the last six months. Seekda, with only four reviews, has no recent feedback and lacks an HTR Score, making its data less reliable for current evaluations. Both tools aim to streamline distribution, but eviivo’s extensive review base provides clearer insights into its ongoing performance.
While Seekda emphasizes a broad OTA network—over 300 partners—it has limited recent user feedback, which raises questions about its current reliability. eviivo, on the other hand, offers proven usability with high support ratings and a focus on smaller property types, especially vacation rentals and B&Bs. Given the more recent, plentiful reviews, eviivo’s reputation appears stronger, but does its feature set cover all your needs?
If your hotel primarily operates as a vacation rental, B&B, or small inn, eviivo Suite™ CM is likely the better fit. Its platform is tailored for smaller operators, with a strong emphasis on multi-property management and user-friendly controls that accommodate less tech-savvy staff.
Seekda, with its focus on larger hotel chains or properties that need extensive distribution across multiple regions—including Asia Pacific, Africa, and beyond—might appeal if your hotel is part of a larger group. However, its limited recent review data suggests less current support and development. For most small to midsize properties, eviivo’s proven track record and dedicated support make it the safer choice.
eviivo Suite™ CM scores 4.65/5 for ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users praise the platform for simplifying complex booking processes, making staff adoption smooth. Support and onboarding are also rated highly, with positive quotes about responsive assistance and helpful training.
Seekda, rated at a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, has very few reviews but is reported to have a user-friendly setup, especially for creating restrictions and managing rates. However, with only four reviews and no detailed recent feedback, it's harder to gauge real-world usability at scale.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo Suite™ CM offers a comprehensive set of features—connecting to all major OTAs with one click, managing multiple properties, rate optimization, and guest communication tools. It covers 15 shared features with Seekda, but the platform’s unique capabilities include automated messaging and detailed analytics, supporting small property operators.
Seekda provides essential features like rate creation, restrictions, promotions, and mapping, but it lacks the breadth of functionalities eviivo offers. Its features are simpler but may not meet the needs of hotels seeking advanced automation or multi-property management.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo’s customer support scores 4.78/5, with reviews citing quick, friendly, and effective assistance. Users repeatedly mention the value of onboarding support and ongoing help, with some noting that agents like Mohamed made a difference. Support responsiveness and personalized help are consistent strengths.
Seekda also boasts a perfect 5/5 support rating, with recent reviews emphasizing immediate availability and seamless onboarding. However, with only a handful of reviews, Seekda’s support reputation isn’t as well-verified as eviivo’s.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo’s 231 reviews and recent positive feedback result in a high NPS score of 9.72/10, with 97% recommending it. Hoteliers across vacation rentals, B&Bs, and small hotels praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Seekda, with only four reviews and no recent ratings, cannot be reliably benchmarked. The limited feedback suggests a cautious approach unless your hotel fits its ideal customer profile.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo charges a base price of $700 per month, with no free tier or trial available. Its pricing model positions it as a premium solution for small to medium-sized properties seeking extensive support and features.
Seekda’s lower base price of $300 per month makes it more accessible for budget-conscious operators. However, the lack of a trial period and limited recent reviews make it hard to assess value beyond cost.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
eviivo Suite™ CM offers a well-established, review-backed platform optimized for small to midsize properties, emphasizing ease of use, support, and features. Its extensive recent reviews and high user ratings make it a dependable choice for hotels seeking reliable distribution.
Seekda’s lower price point and broad OTA network could appeal to larger hotel chains or those with simpler needs, but limited recent feedback diminishes confidence in its current performance. Given the current data, eviivo is the recommended choice for most hoteliers prioritizing support and proven results.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了Eviivo提供的卓越支持和新用户引导体验,尤其赞扬了客服人员在简化过渡和设置流程方面所发挥的作用。支持团队以其快速、清晰的帮助而著称,这对... 许多评论都强调了Eviivo提供的卓越支持和新用户引导体验,尤其赞扬了客服人员在简化过渡和设置流程方面所发挥的作用。支持团队以其快速、清晰的帮助而著称,这对于确保运营顺畅至关重要。
用户对Eviivo直观易用的平台赞不绝口,该平台简化了预订和渠道管理,即使是不懂技术的用户也能轻松上手。预订、渠道和设置方面的便捷导航显著减少了管理工作。
Eviivo的多种功能,例如多物业管理和集中运营控制,备受好评。用户表示这些功能节省了时间并优化了日常管理,但也有一些用户希望获得更多自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该平台在桌面端的使用体验备受好评,但一些评论批评其移动网站操作繁琐,应用程序缺乏直观性,导致用户在移动中管理预订时面临诸多挑战。
部分用户最初遇到了一些技术问题,例如显示错误,但他们表示这些问题在获得技术支持后很快就得到了解决。用户认为持续的技术改进将有利于整个平台的提升。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ CM 和 Seekda Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ CM 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Seekda Channel Manager 提供 32 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Seekda Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ CM:否。Seekda Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 85,Seekda 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问