The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
TripJack |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 66 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 21 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 5 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
TripJack |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 42 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #9 24 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 25 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
TripJack |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #6 21 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 194 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #25 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #20 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right channel management software can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency, revenue, and guest satisfaction. You are weighing eviivo Suite™ CM and TripJack, two products that aim to simplify online distribution. While both promise to connect your property to multiple OTAs, their approach, features, and support differ markedly. Your decision hinges on which platform aligns best with your hotel's size, complexity, and growth goals.
eviivo Suite™ CM is a well-established player with a proven track record, boasting more recent reviews and a broader feature set. TripJack, on the other hand, lacks review data and regional presence but may appeal to smaller or niche properties. Given the current data, which product best meets your hotel's specific needs?
eviivo Suite™ CM dominates in review volume and recency, with 231 reviews, 25 of which are from the last six months, and a high likelihood to recommend score of 97%. TripJack, with zero reviews, offers no recent user feedback to gauge its reliability or effectiveness. eviivo's extensive experience in the market and ongoing user satisfaction make it a more dependable choice for hotels seeking proven performance.
Both products aim to connect your hotel to multiple OTAs, but eviivo offers a comprehensive suite of features that support multi-property management, rate optimization, and analytics. TripJack appears to lack publicly available reviews, integrations, or feature details, leaving its actual capabilities uncertain. Are you comfortable choosing a platform without substantial user feedback?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich channel manager with extensive regional support and proven customer satisfaction, go with eviivo Suite™ CM. It suits small to medium properties, vacation rentals, B&Bs, and multi-property portfolios. If your team prioritizes a platform with a strong track record, ease of use, and robust integrations, eviivo is the clear choice.
If your hotel is a small, independent property with minimal distribution needs and prefers a simple, lightweight solution, TripJack might appeal. However, with no reviews or feature details available, it’s risky to assume it can meet the demands of a busy hotel needing reliable OTA connectivity. Would you risk choosing an unreviewed platform for your distribution needs?
eviivo Suite™ CM scores a 4.65 out of 5 for ease of use, with high ratings for onboarding and customer support, and positive review comments on its intuitive interface. Its support team is highly rated at 4.78/5, with users praising Mohamed's helpfulness and clarity. Conversely, TripJack offers no publicly available usability ratings or user feedback, making it impossible to assess its user-friendliness or onboarding experience.
Based on available data, edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo offers 15 features exclusive to its platform, including PMS connectivity, 2-way real-time integrations, channel self-mapping, support for weekly/monthly rates, yield rules, inventory management, integrated payment processing, multi-lingual support, multi-currency, and analytics dashboards. TripJack provides no specific feature list, leaving its capabilities undefined.
eviivo's feature set is tailored to hotel and vacation rental management, offering tools that streamline operations and maximize revenue. Without comparable information, TripJack’s feature advantage remains unclear. Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo’s customer support is rated 4.78 out of 5, with reviews highlighting quick, friendly, and effective assistance, especially during onboarding. Customers appreciate the guidance from agents like Mohamed and the platform’s responsiveness to issues.
TripJack provides no public support ratings or reviews, which raises questions about its responsiveness and ongoing assistance. Given the importance of reliable support in channel management, eviivo’s strong support reputation favors it. Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo connects to 32 verified partners, including major OTAs and technology providers like Tripadvisor, Hotelchamp, D-Edge, and more. Its extensive integration network ensures your property can reach a wide audience and synchronize data efficiently.
TripJack offers no publicly confirmed integrations, which could limit your distribution channels and operational efficiency. Without verified partnerships, it’s challenging to gauge its connectivity scope. Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo’s review score stands at 85.37 on the HotelTechReport (HTR) score, with 231 reviews and a 97% likelihood to recommend. Its client base spans vacation rentals, B&Bs, and small hotels, with many recent positive comments on user support, ease of use, and feature set.
TripJack has no available reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine overall satisfaction. For a data-backed decision, eviivo’s higher, recent review activity clearly makes it the more trusted option. Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
eviivo charges a flat monthly fee of $700, with no free tier or trial information available. This cost includes access to its full feature set and integrations.
TripJack has no publicly disclosed pricing or trial options, adding uncertainty to its total cost of ownership. If affordability and transparency matter, eviivo’s clear pricing structure offers peace of mind.
Not ideal if your property is a very small independent with minimal distribution, or if you prefer a free or low-cost solution.
Not ideal if your hotel needs proven reliability, extensive features, or regional support.
eviivo Suite™ CM is a mature, review-backed platform with a proven track record, extensive features, and high customer satisfaction. It suits hotels and vacation rentals seeking reliable OTA integration, automation, and analytics to grow their business.
TripJack, with no reviews or detailed feature information, appears untested and limited in scope. For hotels looking for certainty, proven performance, and better support, eviivo is the clear choice.
If your hotel’s success depends on reliable connectivity, time-saving automation, and data-backed support, eviivo Suite™ CM is the safer investment. However, if your needs are minimal and budget constraints are tight, exploring lesser-known options like TripJack might be tempting, though riskier.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了Eviivo提供的卓越支持和新用户引导体验,尤其赞扬了客服人员在简化过渡和设置流程方面所发挥的作用。支持团队以其快速、清晰的帮助而著称,这对... 许多评论都强调了Eviivo提供的卓越支持和新用户引导体验,尤其赞扬了客服人员在简化过渡和设置流程方面所发挥的作用。支持团队以其快速、清晰的帮助而著称,这对于确保运营顺畅至关重要。
用户对Eviivo直观易用的平台赞不绝口,该平台简化了预订和渠道管理,即使是不懂技术的用户也能轻松上手。预订、渠道和设置方面的便捷导航显著减少了管理工作。
Eviivo的多种功能,例如多物业管理和集中运营控制,备受好评。用户表示这些功能节省了时间并优化了日常管理,但也有一些用户希望获得更多自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该平台在桌面端的使用体验备受好评,但一些评论批评其移动网站操作繁琐,应用程序缺乏直观性,导致用户在移动中管理预订时面临诸多挑战。
部分用户最初遇到了一些技术问题,例如显示错误,但他们表示这些问题在获得技术支持后很快就得到了解决。用户认为持续的技术改进将有利于整个平台的提升。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ CM 和 TripJack 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ CM 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 TripJack 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ CM 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ CM:否。TripJack:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 85,TripJack 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问