The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 54 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 8 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #18 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 41 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 38 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 21 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 18 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #15 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 142 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #33 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #29 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ PMS and Flyhotel hinges on what your hotel needs most. eviivo offers a comprehensive, well-rated platform with a proven track record, especially in the UK and Europe, while Flyhotel appears less established and lacks user reviews, making its effectiveness harder to verify. Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but only eviivo’s recent review data solidifies its position as the more trustworthy choice. Are you ready to dive into the details?
eviivo Suite™ stands out with nearly 200 reviews, a high average rating of 4.43/5 for ease of use, and recent positive feedback from users managing a variety of property types. Its platform is built to handle multiple channels, guest communication, and operational management, which is why it’s trusted by over 28,000 accommodations worldwide.
Flyhotel, on the other hand, has no publicly available reviews or recent user feedback, and its overall rating is zero, making it impossible to assess its real-world performance. Without recent reviews or validation from hotel operators, its ability to meet your needs remains uncertain.
Given the clear evidence supporting eviivo’s efficacy, is it worth risking your investment on an unreviewed system?
Edge: eviivo.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich platform with strong user feedback, go with eviivo. It suits independent hotels, B&Bs, vacation rentals, and mixed-property portfolios looking for reliable booking, guest management, and multi-channel distribution.
If you primarily operate a small, straightforward property and are willing to accept the risk of limited information, Flyhotel might seem appealing—though its lack of reviews makes it hard to justify. eviivo’s large review base and recent feedback make it the safer choice for most hoteliers looking for proven results.
In essence, if your goal is operational efficiency with a trusted brand, eviivo is the clear winner.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s ease of use is rated at 4.43/5, with a well-regarded onboarding process and a mobile app praised for its convenience—“The app is a godsend,” says a recent user review. Its interface, though occasionally called “convoluted,” is generally considered manageable and supported by extensive customer support.
Flyhotel offers no ratings or user feedback, making it impossible to gauge its usability. Its lack of reviews suggests no available data on onboarding, user interface, or staff adoption.
Given that eviivo’s recent reviews highlight ease of use and support, edge: eviivo.
eviivo boasts 51 unique features, including a channel manager, revenue management, guest CRM, automated messaging, online check-in, and integrated payment processing. These features address a broad range of hotel operational needs, from reservations to guest communication to financial management.
Flyhotel provides no detailed feature list or comparable functionalities, leaving its capabilities unknown. Without concrete data, it’s impossible to assess whether it can meet your hotel’s operational demands.
Thus, in terms of features, eviivo clearly leads.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s customer support scores 4.42/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness—“Support staff like Xavier and Joseph provide exemplary assistance,” says a recent user. Its onboarding process is also rated at 4.38/5, further emphasizing its dedication to client success.
Flyhotel has no reviews or ratings regarding customer support, support quality, or onboarding experience, making it impossible to compare. The absence of feedback suggests a lack of proven support quality.
Given the critical role support plays in hotel management, eviivo’s recent high ratings give it an edge.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s review count of 191 in the last six months, with a 95% likelihood to recommend, indicates high user satisfaction. Hotels of various sizes, especially B&Bs and vacation rentals, rate it highly for ease of use, support, and features.
Flyhotel, with no reviews or ratings available, cannot be rated by hoteliers. Its lack of user feedback means no comparative data exists for property types or overall satisfaction.
Therefore, eviivo’s proven reputation makes it the preferred choice among hoteliers.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s base price is $700 per month, with no free trial or implementation fees. Its pricing is transparent but premium, reflecting its extensive features and support.
Flyhotel does not disclose pricing details, which could suggest a custom or uncertain pricing model. The absence of pricing information makes direct comparison impossible but raises questions about value and transparency.
Given eviivo’s clear pricing and extensive features, it offers better value for the investment.
Edge: eviivo.
Not ideal if your hotel has minimal online booking needs or prefers a simple, manual system. eviivo’s broad feature set is best for those ready to automate and scale.
Not ideal if your hotel requires proven features, extensive support, or reliability backed by reviews. Flyhotel’s lack of data makes it unsuitable for risk-averse hoteliers.
The core difference is validated performance: eviivo offers a proven, feature-rich platform with recent positive reviews, while Flyhotel’s absence of feedback leaves its capabilities and reliability unverified.
Choose eviivo if your hotel needs a trusted, comprehensive PMS that supports growth, automation, and high guest satisfaction. Its extensive features, support, and proven track record make it the safer and smarter option.
Flyhotel might appeal to small, experimental properties, but without reviews or verified customer success stories, it’s too uncertain for most hoteliers seeking stability and operational excellence.
If your priority is reliability, support, and proven results, eviivo is the clear choice.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 Flyhotel 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Flyhotel 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。Flyhotel:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 87,Flyhotel 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问