The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 208 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
eviivo 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 208 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 208 | 0 |
在分析了 208 条经验证的评价后,eviivo 用户最看重其 响应式客户支持, 入职专业知识, 技术效率,而 webhotelier | primalres group 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应式客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
入职专业知识
▾
|
|
|
+
技术效率
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和预约效率
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
改进建议
▾
|
|
|
−
定制和功能开发
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 54 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 8 条评价 | #53 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #18 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 41 条评价 | #81 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 38 条评价 | #72 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 21 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 18 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #15 39 条评价 | #47 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 142 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #33 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #29 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ PMS by eviivo and PMS hotelizer by webhotelier | primalres group boils down to your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but eviivo’s extensive features, global presence, and larger user base give it a clear edge. Your team should consider whether you need a robust, all-in-one platform or a simpler, more streamlined solution.
eviivo’s platform is designed for diverse accommodation types, from vacation rentals to boutique hotels, with a strong track record supported by more than 191 reviews—including 20 recent ones. Webhotelier’s PMS hotelizer is less prominent, with no recent reviews or user feedback to support its efficacy. Given the data, eviivo is the better choice for most hotels that prioritize reliability and active user insights.
Both eviivo and hotelizer aim to improve operational efficiency and guest experience, but eviivo’s comprehensive feature set and broad market presence set it apart. eviivo offers over 51 unique features including channel management, revenue management, integrated payment processing, and guest CRM, whereas hotelizer provides a more basic property management experience without clearly detailed features.
eviivo’s platform is built for scalability, supporting a variety of property types—ranging from B&Bs to large resorts—while hotelizer’s capabilities appear limited, with no specific features or recent user feedback available. eviivo’s extensive integrations (32 verified partners) further strengthen its position, compared to hotelizer’s 15, which include notable providers but lack recent endorsements.
The core problem both products address is managing reservations and operations efficiently; however, eviivo’s proven track record, recent reviews, and high NPS score (8.87/5) strongly suggest it offers a more reliable, well-rounded solution. Are you comfortable with a system that’s actively supported and widely used, or do you prefer a less established alternative?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, globally trusted PMS with extensive integrations and proven scalability, go with eviivo. Its broad user base, recent reviews, and high satisfaction ratings make it suitable for small independents to medium-sized chains seeking a unified management platform.
If your hotel operates on a very tight budget or only requires basic reservation management without advanced features or integrations, hotelizer could suffice—though its lack of recent reviews and detailed feature info makes this choice less certain. For most hotels, especially those looking to grow or streamline operations, eviivo’s robust offering is the safer, smarter choice.
eviivo’s ease of use is reflected in its 4.43/5 rating, with many users emphasizing its intuitive interface, onboarding support, and mobile app. Recent reviews praise its straightforward setup and user-friendly management tools, including a mobile app that enables on-the-go control.
In contrast, there are no available user ratings or recent feedback for hotelizer, making it difficult to assess its usability. Given eviivo’s high ratings and recent positive reviews, it clearly offers a more accessible platform for staff adoption and daily operations.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo delivers a comprehensive suite of 51 exclusive features, including channel management, revenue tools, payment processing, guest CRM, digital registration, and mobile check-in. It also incorporates advanced modules like automated night audits, guest messaging, and task management—features that significantly enhance operational control.
Hotelizer’s feature set remains undefined in the review data, with no details on whether it offers similar functionalities or integrations. With no recent validation or detailed feature list, it’s evident eviivo’s extensive capabilities give it a substantial edge.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo is highly rated for support, earning a 4.42/5 rating, with multiple reviews citing its responsive, helpful customer service. Support staff are described as exemplary, especially during onboarding, which is crucial during initial setup and when troubleshooting.
There are no recent reviews or performance data for hotelizer’s support quality. Given the importance of ongoing support for smooth hotel operations and the strong feedback on eviivo’s service, eviivo clearly provides a more reliable support experience.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, TripAdvisor, and niche providers such as PriceLabs and Canary Technologies. Its extensive integration network ensures your property can connect with most distribution channels and revenue management tools.
Hotelizer’s integration count is smaller, with only 15 verified partners, including platforms like Cendyn, Mews, and Oracle Hospitality, but no recent user feedback supports its breadth or effectiveness. eviivo’s wider, more validated integration network makes it the superior choice.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s recent reviews show a high likelihood to recommend rate of 95%, with an overall rating of 0.93/5 and an HT score of 87.05. Users highlight its ease of use, customer support, and value for money, with specific praise for its operational efficiencies and automation.
In contrast, hotelizer has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Given eviivo’s active user base and recent positive feedback, it’s clear that hoteliers rate eviivo significantly higher.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s pricing starts at a flat monthly fee of $700, with no free tier or trial info available. It’s a fixed-cost model that offers transparency but requires an upfront investment.
Pricing details for hotelizer are not provided, which suggests either custom quotes or less transparent pricing models. Given eviivo’s clearly stated pricing, it remains easier to evaluate its value proposition.
eviivo offers a comprehensive, well-supported platform trusted by thousands of properties worldwide, with recent reviews confirming its ease of use and extensive functionality. Its large user base and detailed feature set make it suitable for a wide range of property types, especially those planning growth or needing advanced management tools.
Hotelizer, lacking recent reviews and detailed feature validation, may appeal to budget-conscious or very small properties needing minimal automation. However, the absence of current user feedback suggests it’s a riskier choice for hotels seeking reliability and support.
For most hoteliers evaluating a PMS today, eviivo is the clear leader, providing proven results, extensive integrations, and high satisfaction ratings. It’s the safer option that aligns with most hotels’ operational and growth ambitions.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 PMS hotelizer 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 39 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 PMS hotelizer 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 PMS hotelizer 提供 15 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。PMS hotelizer:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 87,webhotelier | primalres group 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问