The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 208 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
eviivo 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Winner Hotel Software 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 208 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 208 | 0 |
在分析了 208 条经验证的评价后,eviivo 用户最看重其 响应式客户支持, 入职专业知识, 技术效率,而 Winner Hotel Software 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应式客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
入职专业知识
▾
|
|
|
+
技术效率
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和预约效率
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
改进建议
▾
|
|
|
−
定制和功能开发
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 54 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 8 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #18 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 41 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 38 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 21 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 18 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #15 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 142 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #33 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #29 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel hinges on your operational needs, size, and growth ambitions. Both eviivo Suite™ by eviivo and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in user experience, features, and market reach. eviivo’s long-standing presence in independent and small hotel segments, combined with its extensive reviews, makes it a more reliable choice for most hoteliers today. Do you prioritize proven user satisfaction and comprehensive functionality?
While Winner PMS offers a solid core of reservation and operational features, it has yet to demonstrate the same level of adoption, recent reviews, or user feedback as eviivo. With more recent reviews and a higher review count, eviivo’s reputation is clearer and more current. So, which system aligns better with your hotel’s scale and future plans?
eviivo Suite and Winner PMS both target hotel operators who want to manage reservations, guest communications, and operations efficiently. eviivo’s system is praised for its ease of use, customer support, and feature richness, especially within independent hotel, B&B, and vacation rental markets. Winner PMS, on the other hand, emphasizes operational centralization and integration, but its lack of recent reviews and limited market presence make it harder to assess its current effectiveness.
eviivo’s platform is built for various accommodation types, from small B&Bs to large resorts, with over 191 reviews and a 95% recommendation rate in the last six months. Conversely, Winner PMS has no recent reviews or detailed user feedback available, which raises questions about its current market standing. Are you comfortable choosing a system with a proven track record, or are you willing to risk less-tested software?
In sum, eviivo’s recent, plentiful user feedback and high satisfaction scores suggest it’s better suited for hoteliers seeking reliability and ongoing support. Winner PMS, with no recent reviews, remains an uncertain option for your hotel.
If your hotel needs a flexible, easy-to-use PMS with strong integrations, eviivo is the clear pick. It caters well to independent hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals looking for a platform with extensive features, including channel management, guest CRM, automation, and revenue management—51 unique features in total.
If your hotel requires a straightforward, centralized operational tool and is comfortable with a less established provider, Winner PMS could be considered. However, given its limited review data and absence of recent user feedback, it’s less advisable unless your team is prepared to handle potential uncertainties.
For most hoteliers, especially smaller and independent properties, eviivo’s comprehensive feature set and proven track record outweigh Winner PMS’s claims of centralization. The choice is evident: eviivo provides more value through its established presence, features, and user satisfaction.
eviivo’s platform is rated 4.43 out of 5 for ease of use, with a strong onboarding process rated at 4.38. Users frequently mention its intuitive interface, straightforward management, and helpful onboarding support. The mobile app further enhances usability, enabling management from anywhere, with positive reviews highlighting how it simplifies daily tasks.
Winner PMS, however, has no publicly available ratings or recent user reviews to evaluate its usability or onboarding process. Without this data, we cannot confidently attest to its ease of use or ease of adoption.
Edge: eviivo. Its high usability rating, extensive positive reviews, and mobile app provide a more user-friendly experience for your team.
eviivo boasts 51 features exclusive to its platform, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, automated messaging, online check-in/out, and integrated payment processing. These features cover virtually all operational needs for small to mid-sized hotels and rentals, with continuous updates and integrations.
Winner PMS offers core reservation, check-in, billing, and housekeeping features but lacks the extensive customization and automation tools found in eviivo. Importantly, it has no unique features listed beyond basic functionalities.
Edge: eviivo. Its broad feature set, including advanced automation and guest communication tools, makes it the more comprehensive option.
eviivo’s customer support is highly rated at 4.42 out of 5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and helpfulness. Support staff are praised for guiding users through onboarding and resolving issues swiftly, which enhances confidence and smooth operation.
There are no recent reviews or detailed feedback available for Winner PMS’s customer support. The lack of public ratings or testimonials suggests it may not match eviivo’s level of service and reliability.
Edge: eviivo. Its high support ratings and positive customer feedback make it a safer choice for your team’s operational stability.
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, VRBO, and industry tools like TripAdvisor and D-Edge. Its extensive partner network ensures your property can reach wide audiences with synchronized rates and availability.
Winner PMS has only one verified partner listed—Mews—and no other integration data is available. This limited connectivity could hinder your ability to connect with key distribution channels or management tools.
Edge: eviivo. Its broad and verified integrations support your hotel’s distribution and operational needs more effectively.
eviivo’s recent reviews consistently rate it highly, with a 95% likelihood of recommendation and a user rating of 4.43/5 for ease of use and 4.42/5 for support. The hotel segments most satisfied include vacation rentals, B&Bs, and small hotels, with many users praising its simplicity and customer service.
In contrast, Winner PMS lacks recent reviews, making it impossible to determine current user satisfaction or property segment ratings. Without recent feedback, it’s safer to trust eviivo’s established reputation.
Edge: eviivo. Its higher, recent review counts and ratings confirm a stronger endorsement from the hotel community.
eviivo charges a flat monthly fee of $700 with no implementation or trial fees. This covers access to its extensive features, support, and updates, making it straightforward to budget for the platform.
Winner PMS’s pricing details are unavailable, which complicates direct comparison. The lack of transparent pricing suggests it may not be as accessible or scalable for smaller properties.
Given the transparent, fixed cost of eviivo, it offers clear value for your investment.
eviivo Suite is a well-established, feature-rich PMS trusted by nearly 200 hotels, with recent reviews showing high satisfaction. Its ease of use, strong support, and broad integrations make it the superior choice for most small to mid-sized hotels.
Winner PMS has potential in operational centralization but currently lacks recent user feedback or verified integrations, making it a less reliable option without further validation. If your hotel values proven performance and ongoing support, eviivo stands out as the clear leader.
In summary, if your hotel needs a trusted, full-featured PMS with extensive reviews and recent positive feedback, eviivo is the safer, more proven option. Choose Winner PMS only if you have specific, untested requirements and are prepared for a higher risk.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 39 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。Winner PMS (acquired by Mews):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 87,Winner Hotel Software 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问