The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 328 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Winner Hotel Software 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 328 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 328 | 0 |
在分析了 328 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 功能丰富, 运营效率, 响应式支持和定期更新,而 Winner Hotel Software 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能丰富
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
响应式支持和定期更新
▾
|
|
|
+
易于培训使用
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误消息
▾
|
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #17 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both Clock PMS and Winner PMS aim to streamline hotel management tasks, but they diverge significantly in maturity, reviews, and global presence. While Winner PMS was acquired by Mews and boasts a large user base, Clock PMS is more established with recent positive feedback. Which option aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Both Clock PMS and Winner PMS address core hotel management issues such as reservations, billing, and housekeeping. However, Clock PMS offers a broader, more integrated feature set, including booking engine, payment processing, and guest engagement tools, all within a single platform. Winner PMS, while competent, mainly focuses on reservation and housekeeping functions, with fewer advanced features. Are you seeking a fully integrated platform or a more targeted solution? Clock PMS's recent reviews and higher ratings suggest it currently outperforms Winner PMS in user satisfaction.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, all-in-one platform that covers reservations, guest messaging, revenue management, and integrations, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Its diverse features—like booking engine, channel management, and ancillary revenue tools—are proven to enhance operational efficiency. Conversely, if your hotel primarily requires basic reservation and housekeeping functions without extensive automation or integrations, Winner PMS might suffice, but it currently lacks the depth and recent user feedback to compete with Clock PMS. Given the latest reviews, Clock PMS’s more extensive functionality makes it the stronger option for most hotels.
Clock PMS enjoys a high ease of use rating of 4.78/5, with recent reviews praising its user-friendly interface and straightforward onboarding process. Hotel staff find training quick, and its intuitive design minimizes errors, even during busy periods. Winner PMS, lacking detailed recent ratings, is generally considered user-friendly in its niche but hasn't demonstrated the same level of recent positive feedback or ease of onboarding. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS offers 58 unique features, including a booking engine, integrated CRS, revenue management, digital check-in, guest CRM, and ancillary revenue tracking—many of which Winner PMS does not provide. Winner PMS’s feature set is less extensive and primarily centered on reservations, check-ins, and housekeeping. If advanced revenue management, guest engagement, and automation are priorities, Clock PMS's broader feature set provides a clear advantage. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS is highly rated for customer support, with a 4.75/5 rating and recent reviews highlighting responsive, proactive assistance. Users mention quick responses and helpful onboarding, with some expressing appreciation for continuous updates. Winner PMS’s support details are less transparent, and without recent review data, it’s difficult to compare. Based on available information, Clock PMS's support reputation is stronger. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS boasts 111 verified partners, covering a wide range of integrations such as channel managers, revenue tools, and third-party apps like Hotel Investor and Profitroom. Winner PMS has only 1 verified partner—Mews—limiting its integration options. If your hotel relies heavily on third-party tools, Clock PMS’s extensive partner network offers significant flexibility. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS has an overall rating of 4.8/5, based on 251 reviews, with recent feedback from hotelier segments like boutique hotels and Bed & Breakfasts. Hotels in these segments highly praise its ease of use, feature set, and support. Winner PMS lacks publicly available recent reviews, making it difficult to gauge user satisfaction. Given the recent, high-volume reviews for Clock PMS, the clear winner here is Clock. Edge: Clock PMS.
Clock PMS charges a flat monthly fee of $600, with no implementation fees or hidden charges, offering a predictable cost structure. Pricing for Winner PMS is not publicly disclosed, and as it is part of Mews, its pricing likely varies based on hotel size and needs. The lack of transparent pricing for Winner PMS makes it challenging to compare directly, but Clock PMS’s straightforward model is appealing for budgeting certainty.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Clock PMS is a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS with a proven track record of high satisfaction, recent reviews, and extensive features. Its broad integration network and user-friendly design make it suitable for hotels that want to modernize operations and enhance guest experiences. Winner PMS, though reliable, currently lacks recent reviews and a broad feature set, making it better suited for smaller properties or those with minimal automation needs.
For most hotels seeking a future-proof, versatile system with ongoing support, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Its extensive capabilities and positive recent feedback indicate it will better serve your hotel’s operational and strategic goals. Choose Winner PMS only if your needs are minimal and Mews’s ecosystem aligns with your existing systems.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Clock PMS 和 Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 46 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。Winner PMS (acquired by Mews):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,Winner Hotel Software 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问