The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 54 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 8 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #18 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 41 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 38 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 21 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 18 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #15 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 142 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #33 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #29 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ PMS and Zavia ERP hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, size, and regional presence. Both systems address reservation management, guest communication, and operational control, but they diverge significantly in user experience, support, and market reach. eviivo’s extensive review base and recent positive feedback make it the more reliable choice at this stage. Which system aligns best with your current priorities?
Both eviivo and Zavia aim to streamline hotel operations, but eviivo’s software is more established globally, especially in Europe and North America. Zavia, on the other hand, is tailored for smaller hotels in Mexico and Latin America, emphasizing affordability and local support. However, eviivo’s recent reviews and higher ratings suggest it’s better suited for hotels seeking proven reliability and broad integrations.
While eviivo boasts over 191 reviews, most from recent months, Zavia has no reviews or customer feedback available to date. This difference highlights eviivo’s stronger market presence and ongoing user satisfaction. Do you prioritize a system with an active user community and recent performance data?
If your hotel operates primarily in Europe or North America and needs a tested, feature-rich PMS with high customer satisfaction, go with eviivo. Its focus on independent hotels, B&Bs, vacation rentals, and small resorts makes it suitable for diverse property types with multiple booking channels. For hotels that prioritize affordability, local support, and native Spanish language, Zavia might seem appealing, but the lack of reviews makes its effectiveness uncertain.
For hotels that want a stable, widely adopted platform with a strong review backing, eviivo’s more extensive feature set and recent positive feedback make it the clear choice. If your core concern is risk mitigation and proven support, eviivo stands out. If cost is your primary driver and your hotel size falls within Zavia’s target range, consider Zavia—but note the lack of recent user data.
eviivo’s user experience is rated 4.43/5, with a straightforward onboarding process and highly praised customer support, as reflected in a 4.42/5 support score. Recent reviews highlight its intuitive interface, especially for independent hoteliers and vacation rental managers, with users noting their ability to manage properties on mobile apps efficiently.
Zavia, with no available reviews or ratings, offers a simplified, localized interface designed for smaller hotels. However, the absence of user feedback leaves its ease of use unverified. Based on available data, edge: eviivo.
eviivo offers 47 shared features plus 4 exclusive features like Guest CRM, Integrated CRS, Automated reminders, and SOC2 compliance—enhancing marketing, guest management, and security. Zavia provides 47 shared features but only 4 unique features such as ID scanning, lobby kiosk, and rules-based room assignments, mostly focusing on operational control.
eviivo’s broader feature set, especially in guest engagement and automation, gives it an edge. Its integrations with major OTAs and AI-powered tools are proven to support growth and efficiency. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s customer support is highly rated at 4.42/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and onboarding assistance. Hoteliers frequently mention their positive experiences working with dedicated support staff, especially during initial setup and troubleshooting.
Zavia, in contrast, has no reviews or documented support ratings, making it impossible to assess its customer service quality. Given the critical role of support in operational success, edge: eviivo.
eviivo boasts 32 verified integration partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, and Airbnb, along with niche partners like Experience Hotel and PriceLabs. Zavia’s integrations are limited to 5 verified partners, with only four common partners shared with eviivo, including Stripe and Profitroom.
The extensive integration ecosystem of eviivo enables seamless distribution and automation across multiple channels, supporting larger and more complex operations. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s recent reviews and high scores—overall rating of 0.93/5 and NPS of 8.87/5—indicate significant user satisfaction, especially among independent hotels, vacation rentals, and B&Bs. The platform’s recent review activity shows continued relevance and user engagement, with 20 reviews in the last six months.
Zavia, lacking review data, cannot be rated by users. The absence of feedback makes it impossible to determine user satisfaction, so the clear choice based on available evidence is: edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s pricing model starts at $700 per month, with no indication of a free trial or tiered options. Zavia’s base price is $300 per month, also without a free trial, but the lower starting cost might appeal to smaller hotels with tight budgets.
However, the higher price of eviivo is justified by its extensive features, integrations, and support, while Zavia’s limited user feedback makes value for money harder to assess. If comprehensive features and proven support matter, eviivo’s premium is worth considering.
Hotels that should consider eviivo:
Not ideal if:
Edge: Hotels that value proven reliability and extensive features.
Hotels that should consider Zavia:
Not ideal if:
Edge: Hotels that want a cost-effective, localized solution in Latin America.
eviivo offers an established, feature-rich PMS with a large user base and recent positive reviews, making it suitable for hotels of various sizes seeking reliability and growth support. Its high ratings and extensive integrations provide confidence in operational efficiency and guest management.
Zavia, while promising in affordability and local focus, lacks recent user feedback, which raises questions about its effectiveness and support. For hotels in Latin America with small to medium portfolios, Zavia may suffice, but for broader growth and stability, eviivo is the safer choice.
If your hotel needs proven technology, extensive integrations, and high customer satisfaction, choose eviivo. If budget and regional presence are your main concerns, and you’re comfortable with limited feedback, Zavia could be a consideration—but proceed cautiously.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 Zavia ERP 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zavia ERP 提供 5 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。Zavia ERP:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 87,Zavia ERP 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问