The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 249 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Exely 表现出色 在 channel manager integration and synchronization 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Multi-Currency Support.
HotelRunner 表现出色 在 多渠道管理 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Email Marketing and Data Analysis & Reporting.
基于 HTR 上 249 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 134 | 115 |
在分析了 249 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 channel manager integration and synchronization, 用户界面和可用性, 支持与响应,而 HotelRunner 用户则强调 多渠道管理, 支持与可靠性, 易用性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Channel Manager Integration and Synchronization
▾
|
+
多渠道管理
▾
|
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
+
支持与可靠性
▾
|
|
+
支持与响应
▾
|
+
易用性
▾
|
|
+
直接预订增强
▾
|
+
实时更新
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
分析与报告
▾
|
−
界面改进
▾
|
|
−
自定义和控制
▾
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
−
集成灵活性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 26 条评价 | #12 40 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 51 条评价 | #13 22 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 5 条评价 | #10 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #7 5 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 29 条评价 | #7 51 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #13 27 条评价 | #10 31 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 14 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 6 条评价 | #12 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #18 2 条评价 | #19 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 10 条评价 | #14 16 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 67 条评价 | #13 8 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 13 条评价 | #2 63 条评价 |
Choosing the right channel management software can significantly impact your hotel's revenue and operational efficiency. Both Exely Channel Manager and HotelRunner Channel Manager aim to streamline your distribution channels, reduce errors, and maximize bookings. However, they diverge in their approach, features, and market presence, making it essential to compare their capabilities thoroughly.
Exely excels in providing a user-friendly, highly-rated platform with recent positive reviews and a strong customer support reputation. HotelRunner offers a broader feature set, more integrations, and a larger global reach but has slightly fewer recent reviews. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Both products aim to optimize your online distribution, but they differ in their core focus and customer feedback. Exely is praised for its intuitive interface, stability, and real-time synchronization, with recent reviews highlighting its ease of use and reliable performance. HotelRunner emphasizes multi-channel management, offering extensive integrations and additional features like web design and email marketing.
While Exely’s reviews are more numerous and recent, indicating higher confidence in its current performance, HotelRunner shows a broader set of functionalities that cater to hotels seeking a comprehensive management solution. Are you prioritizing ease of use and recent support quality, or do you need a wide feature set with extensive integrations?
If your hotel needs a streamlined channel manager focusing on stable, real-time synchronization with minimal manual effort, go with Exely. Its high ratings—85.1 HTR Score, 4.78/5 overall, over 100 reviews with recent feedback—demonstrate strong satisfaction among users, especially in operational efficiency.
If your hotel requires a more feature-rich platform with marketing tools, PMS connectivity, and a larger network of integrations, HotelRunner is the better fit. With a slightly lower recent review count but a higher total, it suits hotels aiming for growth and broader digital presence. For hotels prioritizing simplicity and stability, Exely is the safer choice; for those seeking expansion tools, HotelRunner may be preferable.
Exely enjoys a near-perfect ease of use rating at 4.95/5, supported by its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process, as reflected in recent reviews praising its simplicity and minimal learning curve. Users mention that Exely’s platform feels very stable and user-friendly, with quick setup and efficient daily operations.
HotelRunner also scores highly at 4.7/5, with reviews highlighting its ease of controlling rates and inventory, especially during busy periods. However, some users note that interface speed could improve, and initial setup can be challenging for less tech-savvy staff.
Edge: Exely.
Exely offers 12 shared features with other channel managers but stands out with its unique Multi-Currency Support. Users appreciate its stability and synchronization speed, which directly impact operational efficiency.
HotelRunner boasts a broader feature set—adding 12 unique functionalities like email marketing, web design, PMS connectivity, and social media management—making it a more versatile platform. It also provides unlimited channels without extra costs, a critical advantage for hotels with diverse distribution needs.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Both products are praised for strong support, but Exely’s recent reviews and high NPS score (9.8/10) reflect a slightly better reputation. Users mention responsive, helpful support that resolves issues quickly, with some noting Exely’s proactive updates and partnership attitude.
HotelRunner also receives positive feedback, especially for quick responses and dedicated support. However, reviews indicate occasional frustrations with support responsiveness during system failures, suggesting room for improvement in consistency.
Edge: Exely.
HotelRunner significantly surpasses Exely in integrations, with 17 verified partners versus Exely’s 8. Both share Oracle Hospitality and IDeaS but HotelRunner’s list includes major industry players like Airbnb, Expedia, and Stripe, along with specialized PMS and channel partners.
This extensive network makes HotelRunner more adaptable for hotels with complex distribution needs or multiple PMS systems. For simpler operations, Exely’s smaller but solid set of integrations may suffice.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Recent reviews show Exely with a higher overall rating (4.78/5) and a stronger recommendation rate (98%) based on over 100 reviews, predominantly from independent and boutique hotels. Larger hotels and resorts seem more satisfied with its stability and simplicity.
HotelRunner’s ratings are slightly lower at 4.7/5, with reviews emphasizing ease of control and support but noting interface speed issues. Its customer base includes a wider variety of hotel types, especially B&Bs and independent properties.
Edge: Exely.
Both products are priced at a base rate of $100 per month, with no freemium, setup fees, or additional costs listed. This straightforward pricing makes comparison easy, though neither provides detailed tier options or discounts, which might be available upon request.
Not ideal if you need extensive marketing tools, web design, or PMS integration beyond core features.
Not ideal if your focus is solely on simple channel management without the need for extra marketing or development tools.
Exely offers a highly-rated, easy-to-use channel management platform that excels in operational stability, synchronization speed, and customer support. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction scores make it ideal for hotels that need reliable, straightforward distribution management.
HotelRunner provides a broader range of features, including extensive integrations, marketing capabilities, and web tools. It’s best suited for hotels looking to grow their online presence and utilize a full suite of management solutions.
If your hotel values simplicity, recent positive feedback, and high support quality, Exely is the better choice. If you need a versatile platform with many added functionalities to support expansion, HotelRunner is the way to go.
渠道经理 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Exely Channel Manager 和 HotelRunner Channel Manager 共享 14 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Web开发 | ||
| 元搜索营销 | ||
| 多币种支持 | ||
| 数据分析和报告 | ||
| 电子邮件营销 | ||
| 网页设计 | ||
| 转化率优化 |
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
The robust integration and synchronization abilities of Exely facilitate smooth channel management with minimal errors. Users commend how effectively... The robust integration and synchronization abilities of Exely facilitate smooth channel management with minimal errors. Users commend how effectively it connects with PMS and OTAs, though some desire improvements in certain PMS integrations.
Exely 的用户友好界面是其一大优势,方便酒店员工管理日常运营。然而,部分用户建议进一步进行定制和现代化改造,以提升用户体验。
Exely 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而备受赞誉,从而确保了服务的可靠性。然而,一些用户建议在高峰时段响应速度可以更快一些。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Exely 提供了重要的绩效洞察,但用户表示需要更详细、可定制的报告选项,以便更好地分析渠道有效性并推动战略决策。
尽管 Exely 为预订规则和促销活动提供了高级自定义选项,但一些用户希望网站模板和报告格式能有更灵活的设计选项。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户称赞 HotelRunner 能够通过单一平台无缝管理多个预订渠道。这项功能在旺季尤为重要,它能减少工作量和人为错误,同时确保所有渠道的信息保持最新。
用户评价中经常强调快速便捷的支持服务和可靠的运行性能。当用户需要帮助时,能够迅速获得响应,确保运行顺畅,避免重大中断。
客户经常提及该系统的用户友好性,尤其赞赏其能够便捷地跨多个渠道控制和发送价格。这种易用性对于酒店员工处理日常运营而言是一项显著优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论指出,对界面进行一些小的改进可能会有所裨益。虽然该系统总体上符合预期,但优化界面可以进一步简化操作。
用户普遍批评的一点是更新速度。尽管目前运行流畅,但一些用户认为速度可以更快,以提高操作效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Channel Manager 和 HotelRunner Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Channel Manager 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelRunner Channel Manager 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Channel Manager:否。HotelRunner Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 85,HotelRunner 的为 76。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问