The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 197 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Exely 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Vertical Booking 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 197 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 158 | 39 |
在分析了 197 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 易用性和操作效率, 支持质量和响应能力, 直接预订增长和收入优化,而 Vertical Booking 用户则强调 客户支持, 通道连通性, 集成平台。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性和操作效率
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
支持质量和响应能力
▾
|
+
通道连通性
▾
|
|
+
直接预订增长和收入优化
▾
|
+
集成平台
▾
|
|
+
需要更多OTA平台、渠道和集成
▾
|
+
定制
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析的局限性
▾
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
|
−
报告、品牌和预订引擎设计方面的定制化不足
▾
|
−
设置与培训
▾
|
|
−
API 文档
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 26 条评价 | #23 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 51 条评价 | #21 14 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 5 条评价 | #12 8 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #7 5 条评价 | #18 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 29 条评价 | #19 19 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #13 27 条评价 | #18 17 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 14 条评价 | #25 6 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 6 条评价 | #20 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #18 2 条评价 | #8 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 10 条评价 | #20 10 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 67 条评价 | #20 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 13 条评价 | #8 8 条评价 |
Choosing the right channel management system is essential for your hotel's online distribution and revenue growth. Both Exely Channel Manager and Vertical Booking Synchro Channel Manager aim to streamline your operations, but they differ significantly in capabilities, user feedback, and market presence. Your decision hinges on your needs for features, integration, support, and reliability.
Exely offers a highly rated, feature-rich platform with extensive recent reviews, while Vertical Booking provides a broader partner network and strong user satisfaction, especially among high-end hotels. Which solution aligns better with your hotel's current priorities?
Both Exely and Vertical Booking address the core problem of managing multiple distribution channels effectively, reducing manual updates, and preventing overbookings. However, Exely’s focus on automation and in-depth analytics distinguishes it by providing detailed reports and extensive customization options, backed by a high user rating of 85 on the HTR Score. Vertical Booking emphasizes ease of use and broad integration, with a lower user rating but a larger partner network.
The critical difference lies in review recency and volume: Exely has 102 reviews, 34 within the last six months, and a 98% likelihood to recommend, indicating recent, strong performance. Vertical Booking's 36 reviews are older, with no recent data, making its reliability less clear despite high satisfaction among its users. Do you value recent, detailed feedback over a broader but older set of reviews?
If your hotel needs a channel manager with advanced features like channel self-mapping, derived rates, multi-currency support, and detailed analytics, Exely is the better fit. It’s ideal for independent or chain hotels seeking operational efficiency and revenue insights.
On the other hand, if your hotel relies heavily on broad integrations, seamless connectivity with GDS and OTAs, and prefers a straightforward interface with reliable support, Vertical Booking may suit your needs better. It’s especially suitable for luxury hotels or resorts with a focus on real-time rate adjustments across many channels.
Your choice depends on whether you prioritize feature depth and analytics (Exely) or broad connectivity and simplicity (Vertical Booking).
Exely’s UI scores a 4.95/5, praised for its intuitive design and ease of navigating complex features like inventory management and analytics. Users report onboarding as smooth, with a focus on reducing manual tasks, and recent reviews highlight their responsiveness.
Vertical Booking’s UI scores 4.42/5, with many users noting its straightforwardness but suggesting some room for visual updates. Support in onboarding and troubleshooting is rated highly, though some users report delays, especially with initial setup.
Edge: Exely.
Exely boasts 13 exclusive features, including channel self-mapping, support for weekly and monthly rates, multi-currency and multi-lingual support, and an analytics dashboard. These features enable detailed rate customization, comprehensive reporting, and multi-channel control, making it ideal for hotels wanting granular management.
Vertical Booking offers no unique features but excels at integration with its all-in-one platform, including CRS, channel management, and booking engine, which many users find simplifies daily operations. However, it lacks the advanced analytics and customization options present in Exely.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s customer support scores 4.95/5, with recent reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and proactive communication. Users describe their support as professional and responsive, with some wishing for more training resources.
Vertical Booking’s support scores 4.46/5, often praised for quick responses and local presence. Some reviews note delays and support issues, especially in the US, but overall, satisfaction remains high.
Edge: Exely.
Vertical Booking greatly outpaces Exely with 69 verified partners versus Exely’s 8. Shared integrations include Oracle Hospitality, IDeaS, and Mews. Its extensive partner network supports a wide range of PMS, CRS, and GDS integrations, making it highly adaptable.
Exely’s integrations are limited but include key partners like Hotellab and Booking.com, with features like inventory management and analytics. If your focus is on broad connectivity, Vertical Booking’s larger network is advantageous.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Exely’s recent reviews show an overall rating of 0/5, which suggests limited current feedback but a high likelihood to recommend based on earlier data. Its reviews praise efficiency, ease of use, and positive revenue impact—especially among boutique and city-center hotels.
Vertical Booking’s ratings of 4.57/5, based on 36 older reviews, highlight its reliability, good support, and value for money. It tends to resonate with luxury and resort hotels, with recent feedback indicating continued satisfaction.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Exely charges a straightforward $100 monthly fee with no implementation or trial costs, making it easy to budget. Pricing details for Vertical Booking are not publicly available, but it appears to operate on a custom quote basis, potentially reflecting a higher or variable cost depending on the size and needs of your hotel.
If predictable pricing is important, Exely provides transparency. For larger properties or those needing extensive integrations, Vertical Booking’s custom pricing may be a factor.
Exely offers an advanced, feature-rich channel management system backed by recent, high-volume reviews. It excels if your hotel values detailed analytics, automation, and customizable reporting, especially for independent or boutique hotels.
Vertical Booking provides a broad partner network, strong GDS and OTA connections, and high user satisfaction among luxury hotels. It’s best if you prioritize wide integrations, real-time rate updates, and a straightforward interface.
Choose Exely if your focus is on detailed control, analytics, and automation. Turn to Vertical Booking if broad connectivity, support, and ease of use are your top priorities.
渠道经理 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | — |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
费率管理
|
|
|
| 支持每周和每月费率 | ||
| 收益规则 | ||
| 派生费率 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 库存网格 | ||
|
▾
房间类型映射
|
|
|
| 通道自映射 | ||
|
▾
自动化与同步
|
|
|
| 批量更新和多重限制 | ||
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
|
▾
管理和设置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多币种支持 | ||
| 库存网格 | ||
| 综合支付处理 | ||
|
▾
分析和报告
|
|
|
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 预订绩效和进度报告 |
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Before Exely, we could not get enough flexibility or functionality we needed. We couldn’t manage dynamic pricing or promotions properly, now the system provides us all the tools t..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论者一致认为 Exely 直观易用、简单易学,并且能够高效地在一个平台上管理预订、房价和渠道。其主要优势在于节省时间:酒店表示,Exely 简化了日常运营,降低... 评论者一致认为 Exely 直观易用、简单易学,并且能够高效地在一个平台上管理预订、房价和渠道。其主要优势在于节省时间:酒店表示,Exely 简化了日常运营,降低了复杂性,并帮助员工减少手动操作,从而提高工作效率。
许多用户称赞Exely的支持团队能够快速提供以解决方案为导向的帮助,使操作更加顺畅,尤其是在设置或紧急预订问题上。少数用户指出,如果高峰期响应速度更快或本... 许多用户称赞Exely的支持团队能够快速提供以解决方案为导向的帮助,使操作更加顺畅,尤其是在设置或紧急预订问题上。少数用户指出,如果高峰期响应速度更快或本地支持更积极主动,用户体验将会更上一层楼。
许多评论者认为,Exely 提高了酒店的直接预订量,降低了对在线旅行社 (OTA) 的依赖,从而通过减少佣金成本帮助酒店提高盈利能力。他们还提到了一些以收益为导向... 许多评论者认为,Exely 提高了酒店的直接预订量,降低了对在线旅行社 (OTA) 的依赖,从而通过减少佣金成本帮助酒店提高盈利能力。他们还提到了一些以收益为导向的工具,例如促销活动、早鸟优惠、价格控制和基于入住率的优化,这些工具有助于将更多网站流量转化为实际预订。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
普遍认为,Exely 的内置报表对日常运营很有用,但许多用户希望获得更深入、更可定制的分析功能。评论者要求改进按渠道划分的绩效跟踪、更精准的收入洞察、更快的... 普遍认为,Exely 的内置报表对日常运营很有用,但许多用户希望获得更深入、更可定制的分析功能。评论者要求改进按渠道划分的绩效跟踪、更精准的收入洞察、更快的数据更新速度以及自定义报表选项,以支持更明智的分销决策。
许多评论者希望在报告、确认模板、发票格式和预订引擎外观方面拥有更大的灵活性。最常见的抱怨是分析和品牌定制选项有限,此外还要求提供酒店专属颜色、更现代化... 许多评论者希望在报告、确认模板、发票格式和预订引擎外观方面拥有更大的灵活性。最常见的抱怨是分析和品牌定制选项有限,此外还要求提供酒店专属颜色、更现代化的模板,以及对预订流程和促销活动的更好控制。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户服务因其响应迅速、专业和以解决方案为导向而获得积极反馈,尽管一些用户注意到延迟和可用性问题,特别是在美国市场。
人们经常提到与多个 OTA 和 GDS 的强大连接,但一些用户报告了初始设置的问题以及 PMS 和 OTA 偶尔出现的同步问题。
Vertical Booking 的一体化平台结合了 CRS、渠道管理器和预订引擎,因简化各种酒店管理任务和提高整体运营效率而受到高度赞誉。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多用户认为界面很简单,但有些人建议进行改进,以实现更直观的导航和视觉增强,特别是对于预订引擎。
初始设置和培训因其全面性而受到普遍赞赏,尽管由于时间安排或复杂性而存在一些挑战,尤其是对于新用户而言。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Channel Manager 和 Vertical Booking (Synchro Channel Manager) 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Channel Manager 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Vertical Booking (Synchro Channel Manager) 提供 72 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Channel Manager:否。Vertical Booking (Synchro Channel Manager):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 88,Vertical Booking 的为 13。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案